Robert J S Briggs, Timothy McLean, Alexandra Rousset, Sylvia Tari, Stephen J O'Leary, Richard C Dowell, Jaime Leigh, Robert Cowan
{"title":"随机对照试验比较使用侧壁或磨牙周围电极阵列的成人人工耳蜗受者的结果。","authors":"Robert J S Briggs, Timothy McLean, Alexandra Rousset, Sylvia Tari, Stephen J O'Leary, Richard C Dowell, Jaime Leigh, Robert Cowan","doi":"10.1097/MAO.0000000000004518","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The primary aim of this study was to compare outcomes of adult cochlear implant recipients receiving either perimodiolar or lateral wall electrode arrays.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>A prospective randomized controlled study was conducted to investigate final electrode array position, speech perception, and vestibular symptoms.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Tertiary referral center.</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>One hundred forty-four adults were assessed for the study. Inclusion criteria were bilateral postlingual severe to profound sensorineural hearing loss, with 500-Hz threshold in the implant ear of 75 dB HL or greater.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>Subjects were randomized to receive either perimodiolar or lateral wall electrode arrays.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>Postoperative electrode array position was assessed by cone-beam computed tomography. Speech perception was measured preoperatively in best-aided conditions, and 3 and 12 months postoperatively. Vestibular symptoms were assessed using two self-reported questionnaires and/or clinician reports.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Postoperative speech perception results for 124 implants in 123 adults showed significant improvement from preoperative scores and from 3 to 12 months postoperatively. Multiple regression analysis indicated no significant effect of electrode array position for any speech perception results at 3 and 12 months postoperatively. Auditory alone, monosyllabic word, and phoneme scores at 12 months were 48.4 and 71.4% for lateral wall electrode arrays and 49.8% and 72.0% for perimodiolar electrode arrays, respectively. No relationships between angle (depth) of electrode array insertion and speech perception outcomes were detected. There was no significant difference in incidence of vestibular symptoms between the groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Correct scala tympani placement of either the perimodiolar or lateral wall electrode arrays used in this study provides excellent speech perception outcomes, with no significant difference demonstrated between groups.</p>","PeriodicalId":19732,"journal":{"name":"Otology & Neurotology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Outcomes for Adult Cochlear Implant Recipients Using a Lateral Wall or Perimodiolar Electrode Array.\",\"authors\":\"Robert J S Briggs, Timothy McLean, Alexandra Rousset, Sylvia Tari, Stephen J O'Leary, Richard C Dowell, Jaime Leigh, Robert Cowan\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/MAO.0000000000004518\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The primary aim of this study was to compare outcomes of adult cochlear implant recipients receiving either perimodiolar or lateral wall electrode arrays.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>A prospective randomized controlled study was conducted to investigate final electrode array position, speech perception, and vestibular symptoms.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Tertiary referral center.</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>One hundred forty-four adults were assessed for the study. Inclusion criteria were bilateral postlingual severe to profound sensorineural hearing loss, with 500-Hz threshold in the implant ear of 75 dB HL or greater.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>Subjects were randomized to receive either perimodiolar or lateral wall electrode arrays.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>Postoperative electrode array position was assessed by cone-beam computed tomography. Speech perception was measured preoperatively in best-aided conditions, and 3 and 12 months postoperatively. Vestibular symptoms were assessed using two self-reported questionnaires and/or clinician reports.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Postoperative speech perception results for 124 implants in 123 adults showed significant improvement from preoperative scores and from 3 to 12 months postoperatively. Multiple regression analysis indicated no significant effect of electrode array position for any speech perception results at 3 and 12 months postoperatively. Auditory alone, monosyllabic word, and phoneme scores at 12 months were 48.4 and 71.4% for lateral wall electrode arrays and 49.8% and 72.0% for perimodiolar electrode arrays, respectively. No relationships between angle (depth) of electrode array insertion and speech perception outcomes were detected. There was no significant difference in incidence of vestibular symptoms between the groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Correct scala tympani placement of either the perimodiolar or lateral wall electrode arrays used in this study provides excellent speech perception outcomes, with no significant difference demonstrated between groups.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19732,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Otology & Neurotology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Otology & Neurotology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/MAO.0000000000004518\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Otology & Neurotology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MAO.0000000000004518","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:本研究的主要目的是比较成人耳蜗植入者接受臼齿周围或侧壁电极阵列的结果。研究设计:一项前瞻性随机对照研究,研究最终电极阵列位置、言语感知和前庭症状。单位:三级转诊中心。患者:144名成年人参与了这项研究。纳入标准为双侧舌后重度至重度感音神经性听力损失,植入耳500 hz阈值为75 dB HL或更高。干预措施:受试者随机接受臼齿周围或侧壁电极阵列。主要观察指标:术后通过锥形束计算机断层扫描评估电极阵列位置。术前在最佳辅助条件下测量语言感知,术后3个月和12个月。使用两份自我报告问卷和/或临床医生报告评估前庭症状。结果:123例成人124例植入物术后语音感知评分较术前及术后3 - 12个月均有显著改善。多元回归分析显示,电极阵列位置对术后3个月和12个月的语音感知结果无显著影响。12个月时,侧壁电极组单独听觉、单音节单词和音素得分分别为48.4和71.4%,磨牙周电极组分别为49.8%和72.0%。电极阵列插入的角度(深度)与语音感知结果之间没有关系。两组间前庭症状的发生率无显著差异。结论:本研究中使用的臼齿周围或侧壁电极阵列的正确放置鼓室可提供良好的语音感知结果,组间无显著差异。
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Outcomes for Adult Cochlear Implant Recipients Using a Lateral Wall or Perimodiolar Electrode Array.
Objective: The primary aim of this study was to compare outcomes of adult cochlear implant recipients receiving either perimodiolar or lateral wall electrode arrays.
Study design: A prospective randomized controlled study was conducted to investigate final electrode array position, speech perception, and vestibular symptoms.
Setting: Tertiary referral center.
Patients: One hundred forty-four adults were assessed for the study. Inclusion criteria were bilateral postlingual severe to profound sensorineural hearing loss, with 500-Hz threshold in the implant ear of 75 dB HL or greater.
Interventions: Subjects were randomized to receive either perimodiolar or lateral wall electrode arrays.
Main outcome measures: Postoperative electrode array position was assessed by cone-beam computed tomography. Speech perception was measured preoperatively in best-aided conditions, and 3 and 12 months postoperatively. Vestibular symptoms were assessed using two self-reported questionnaires and/or clinician reports.
Results: Postoperative speech perception results for 124 implants in 123 adults showed significant improvement from preoperative scores and from 3 to 12 months postoperatively. Multiple regression analysis indicated no significant effect of electrode array position for any speech perception results at 3 and 12 months postoperatively. Auditory alone, monosyllabic word, and phoneme scores at 12 months were 48.4 and 71.4% for lateral wall electrode arrays and 49.8% and 72.0% for perimodiolar electrode arrays, respectively. No relationships between angle (depth) of electrode array insertion and speech perception outcomes were detected. There was no significant difference in incidence of vestibular symptoms between the groups.
Conclusions: Correct scala tympani placement of either the perimodiolar or lateral wall electrode arrays used in this study provides excellent speech perception outcomes, with no significant difference demonstrated between groups.
期刊介绍:
Otology & Neurotology publishes original articles relating to both clinical and basic science aspects of otology, neurotology, and cranial base surgery. As the foremost journal in its field, it has become the favored place for publishing the best of new science relating to the human ear and its diseases. The broadly international character of its contributing authors, editorial board, and readership provides the Journal its decidedly global perspective.