Shuang Geng, Sudanthi Wijewickrema, Bridget Copson, Jean-Marc Gerard, Stephen O'Leary
{"title":"超薄模臼齿电极和超薄直电极的听力保护:系统回顾和荟萃分析。","authors":"Shuang Geng, Sudanthi Wijewickrema, Bridget Copson, Jean-Marc Gerard, Stephen O'Leary","doi":"10.1097/MAO.0000000000004540","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This meta-analysis aims to investigate the hearing preservation (HP) rates of slim straight electrodes (SSE) and slim modiolar electrodes (SME) after cochlear implantation, in the short- and long-term (≤4 months and 4-12 months, respectively).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic search was conducted in PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and ClinicalTrials databases for studies published between 1 January, 2014, and 1 January, 2024. Cohort studies, case series, and randomized controlled trials written in English, reporting HP rates using the HEARRING classification system, were included.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sixteen studies were included, comprising 15 observational studies and 1 randomized controlled trial. The overall short-term HP rate for SSE was 68.70% (95% CI: 52.27-85.12%), which decreased to 56.38% (95% CI: 42.87-69.90%) in the long-term. In contrast, SME maintained stable HP rates of 59.07% (95% CI: 50.03-68.10%) in the short-term, and 59.09% (95% CI: 46.48-71.70%) in the long-term.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The meta-analysis revealed that SME and SSE have a similar HP ability in both the short- and long-terms. Notably, a prominent decline in HP rate over time was observed in the SSE compared with SME.</p>","PeriodicalId":19732,"journal":{"name":"Otology & Neurotology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Hearing Preservation of Slim Modiolar and Slim Straight Electrodes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Shuang Geng, Sudanthi Wijewickrema, Bridget Copson, Jean-Marc Gerard, Stephen O'Leary\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/MAO.0000000000004540\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This meta-analysis aims to investigate the hearing preservation (HP) rates of slim straight electrodes (SSE) and slim modiolar electrodes (SME) after cochlear implantation, in the short- and long-term (≤4 months and 4-12 months, respectively).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic search was conducted in PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and ClinicalTrials databases for studies published between 1 January, 2014, and 1 January, 2024. Cohort studies, case series, and randomized controlled trials written in English, reporting HP rates using the HEARRING classification system, were included.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sixteen studies were included, comprising 15 observational studies and 1 randomized controlled trial. The overall short-term HP rate for SSE was 68.70% (95% CI: 52.27-85.12%), which decreased to 56.38% (95% CI: 42.87-69.90%) in the long-term. In contrast, SME maintained stable HP rates of 59.07% (95% CI: 50.03-68.10%) in the short-term, and 59.09% (95% CI: 46.48-71.70%) in the long-term.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The meta-analysis revealed that SME and SSE have a similar HP ability in both the short- and long-terms. Notably, a prominent decline in HP rate over time was observed in the SSE compared with SME.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19732,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Otology & Neurotology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Otology & Neurotology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/MAO.0000000000004540\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Otology & Neurotology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MAO.0000000000004540","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Hearing Preservation of Slim Modiolar and Slim Straight Electrodes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Purpose: This meta-analysis aims to investigate the hearing preservation (HP) rates of slim straight electrodes (SSE) and slim modiolar electrodes (SME) after cochlear implantation, in the short- and long-term (≤4 months and 4-12 months, respectively).
Methods: A systematic search was conducted in PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and ClinicalTrials databases for studies published between 1 January, 2014, and 1 January, 2024. Cohort studies, case series, and randomized controlled trials written in English, reporting HP rates using the HEARRING classification system, were included.
Results: Sixteen studies were included, comprising 15 observational studies and 1 randomized controlled trial. The overall short-term HP rate for SSE was 68.70% (95% CI: 52.27-85.12%), which decreased to 56.38% (95% CI: 42.87-69.90%) in the long-term. In contrast, SME maintained stable HP rates of 59.07% (95% CI: 50.03-68.10%) in the short-term, and 59.09% (95% CI: 46.48-71.70%) in the long-term.
Conclusion: The meta-analysis revealed that SME and SSE have a similar HP ability in both the short- and long-terms. Notably, a prominent decline in HP rate over time was observed in the SSE compared with SME.
期刊介绍:
Otology & Neurotology publishes original articles relating to both clinical and basic science aspects of otology, neurotology, and cranial base surgery. As the foremost journal in its field, it has become the favored place for publishing the best of new science relating to the human ear and its diseases. The broadly international character of its contributing authors, editorial board, and readership provides the Journal its decidedly global perspective.