Qing-Feng Tao, Can Hua, Di Qin, Chao-Rong Xie, Yun-Zhou Shi, Min Chen, Hui Zheng
{"title":"不同运动类型对紧张性头痛的预防作用:随机对照试验的成分网络荟萃分析。","authors":"Qing-Feng Tao, Can Hua, Di Qin, Chao-Rong Xie, Yun-Zhou Shi, Min Chen, Hui Zheng","doi":"10.1093/postmj/qgaf055","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The effectiveness of exercise for tension-type headache (TTH) is unclear because of the complexity of exercise regimens-usually the combination of different types of exercise. We aimed to estimate the effectiveness of exercise for TTH and to test the incremental effect of each type of exercise by component network meta-analysis (CNMA).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We searched Ovid Medline, Embase, and the Cochrane Library from database inception to 25 December 2023, and a supplementary search was conducted on 10 February 2025. We included randomized controlled trials of exercise, including aerobic, resistance, and stretching exercise, in adults with TTH. The primary outcome was headache frequency, and secondary outcomes were headache intensity and medication use.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twelve trials with 759 participants were included. There were no significant differences between exercise and usual care in reducing headache frequency at the end of treatment with very low certainty evidence (mean difference [MD] -2.30, 95% [confidence interval] CI -8.86 to 4.26), while CNMA suggested that resistance exercise significantly reduced headache frequency (incremental mean difference [iMD] -6.00, 95% CI -9.10 to -2.90) and stretching exercise increased headache frequency (iMD 4.60, 95% CI 1.20 to 8.00). Exercise was better than usual care in reducing headache intensity (MD -2.29, 95% CI -3.23 to -1.34); the CNMA suggested that no single type of exercise had the greatest effect.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Resistance exercise could be considered an effective and accessible treatment for patients with TTH. But our study was limited by heterogeneity and inconsistency of results, and more studies are warranted.</p>","PeriodicalId":20374,"journal":{"name":"Postgraduate Medical Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Disentangling preventive effects of differential exercise types on tension-type headache: a component network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.\",\"authors\":\"Qing-Feng Tao, Can Hua, Di Qin, Chao-Rong Xie, Yun-Zhou Shi, Min Chen, Hui Zheng\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/postmj/qgaf055\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The effectiveness of exercise for tension-type headache (TTH) is unclear because of the complexity of exercise regimens-usually the combination of different types of exercise. We aimed to estimate the effectiveness of exercise for TTH and to test the incremental effect of each type of exercise by component network meta-analysis (CNMA).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We searched Ovid Medline, Embase, and the Cochrane Library from database inception to 25 December 2023, and a supplementary search was conducted on 10 February 2025. We included randomized controlled trials of exercise, including aerobic, resistance, and stretching exercise, in adults with TTH. The primary outcome was headache frequency, and secondary outcomes were headache intensity and medication use.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twelve trials with 759 participants were included. There were no significant differences between exercise and usual care in reducing headache frequency at the end of treatment with very low certainty evidence (mean difference [MD] -2.30, 95% [confidence interval] CI -8.86 to 4.26), while CNMA suggested that resistance exercise significantly reduced headache frequency (incremental mean difference [iMD] -6.00, 95% CI -9.10 to -2.90) and stretching exercise increased headache frequency (iMD 4.60, 95% CI 1.20 to 8.00). Exercise was better than usual care in reducing headache intensity (MD -2.29, 95% CI -3.23 to -1.34); the CNMA suggested that no single type of exercise had the greatest effect.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Resistance exercise could be considered an effective and accessible treatment for patients with TTH. But our study was limited by heterogeneity and inconsistency of results, and more studies are warranted.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20374,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Postgraduate Medical Journal\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Postgraduate Medical Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/postmj/qgaf055\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Postgraduate Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/postmj/qgaf055","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:由于运动方案的复杂性(通常是不同类型运动的组合),运动对紧张性头痛(TTH)的有效性尚不清楚。我们的目的是估计运动对TTH的有效性,并通过成分网络荟萃分析(CNMA)测试每种运动类型的增量效应。方法:检索Ovid Medline、Embase和Cochrane Library从数据库建立到2023年12月25日的文献,并于2025年2月10日进行补充检索。我们纳入了TTH成人运动的随机对照试验,包括有氧运动、阻力运动和伸展运动。主要结局是头痛频率,次要结局是头痛强度和药物使用。结果:纳入12项试验,759名受试者。在治疗结束时,运动和常规护理在减少头痛频率方面没有显著差异,确定性证据非常低(平均差值[MD] -2.30, 95%[置信区间]CI -8.86至4.26),而CNMA建议阻力运动显著降低头痛频率(增量平均差值[iMD] -6.00, 95% CI -9.10至-2.90),拉伸运动增加头痛频率(iMD 4.60, 95% CI 1.20至8.00)。运动在降低头痛强度方面优于常规护理(MD -2.29, 95% CI -3.23 ~ -1.34);CNMA表示,没有哪一种运动的效果最大。结论:抗阻运动是治疗TTH的有效方法。但我们的研究受到异质性和结果不一致的限制,需要进行更多的研究。
Disentangling preventive effects of differential exercise types on tension-type headache: a component network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Background: The effectiveness of exercise for tension-type headache (TTH) is unclear because of the complexity of exercise regimens-usually the combination of different types of exercise. We aimed to estimate the effectiveness of exercise for TTH and to test the incremental effect of each type of exercise by component network meta-analysis (CNMA).
Methods: We searched Ovid Medline, Embase, and the Cochrane Library from database inception to 25 December 2023, and a supplementary search was conducted on 10 February 2025. We included randomized controlled trials of exercise, including aerobic, resistance, and stretching exercise, in adults with TTH. The primary outcome was headache frequency, and secondary outcomes were headache intensity and medication use.
Results: Twelve trials with 759 participants were included. There were no significant differences between exercise and usual care in reducing headache frequency at the end of treatment with very low certainty evidence (mean difference [MD] -2.30, 95% [confidence interval] CI -8.86 to 4.26), while CNMA suggested that resistance exercise significantly reduced headache frequency (incremental mean difference [iMD] -6.00, 95% CI -9.10 to -2.90) and stretching exercise increased headache frequency (iMD 4.60, 95% CI 1.20 to 8.00). Exercise was better than usual care in reducing headache intensity (MD -2.29, 95% CI -3.23 to -1.34); the CNMA suggested that no single type of exercise had the greatest effect.
Conclusion: Resistance exercise could be considered an effective and accessible treatment for patients with TTH. But our study was limited by heterogeneity and inconsistency of results, and more studies are warranted.
期刊介绍:
Postgraduate Medical Journal is a peer reviewed journal published on behalf of the Fellowship of Postgraduate Medicine. The journal aims to support junior doctors and their teachers and contribute to the continuing professional development of all doctors by publishing papers on a wide range of topics relevant to the practicing clinician and teacher. Papers published in PMJ include those that focus on core competencies; that describe current practice and new developments in all branches of medicine; that describe relevance and impact of translational research on clinical practice; that provide background relevant to examinations; and papers on medical education and medical education research. PMJ supports CPD by providing the opportunity for doctors to publish many types of articles including original clinical research; reviews; quality improvement reports; editorials, and correspondence on clinical matters.