{"title":"前臂包扎技术、肌肉收缩和附加压缩垫对绷带下压力的影响。","authors":"Elif Sakizli Erdal, Miray Haspolat, Burak Erturk, Ilke Keser","doi":"10.1089/lrb.2025.0026","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Background:</i></b> This study aimed to evaluate the effects of forearm bandaging techniques, muscle contraction, and additional compression pad use on sub-bandage pressure. <b><i>Methods and Results:</i></b> Thirty-one individuals (26 females, 5 males) with no chronic or lymphatic-related conditions participated in the study. Sub-bandage pressure was measured using the Kikuhime device, with a standardized protocol applied to the wrist extensor muscle belly. Participants were evaluated under rest and wrist extension conditions using two bandaging techniques: spiral and figure-of-eight. Variations included single and double layers, 1/2 and 1/3 overlaps, and the presence or absence of additional compression pads. Certified physiotherapists trained performed all bandaging applications using short-stretch compression materials. The figure-of-eight wrapping technique consistently produced significantly higher sub-bandage pressures compared to the spiral technique in all conditions. Double bandaging generated 1.4 times more pressure than single-layer applications, while 1/3 overlap resulted in greater pressure than 1/2 overlap. The addition of compression pads increased resting pressure by approximately 5 mmHg, and wrist extension further augmented pressure by 4-8 mmHg. The highest pressures were observed with the figure-of-eight technique, double bandaging, and 1/3 overlap combined (<i>p</i> < 0.05). <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> These findings highlight the critical role of forearm bandaging technique, layering, and additional materials in determining sub-bandage pressure.</p>","PeriodicalId":18168,"journal":{"name":"Lymphatic research and biology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effects of Forearm Bandaging Technique, Muscle Contraction, and Additional Compression Pad Use on Sub-Bandage Pressure.\",\"authors\":\"Elif Sakizli Erdal, Miray Haspolat, Burak Erturk, Ilke Keser\",\"doi\":\"10.1089/lrb.2025.0026\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b><i>Background:</i></b> This study aimed to evaluate the effects of forearm bandaging techniques, muscle contraction, and additional compression pad use on sub-bandage pressure. <b><i>Methods and Results:</i></b> Thirty-one individuals (26 females, 5 males) with no chronic or lymphatic-related conditions participated in the study. Sub-bandage pressure was measured using the Kikuhime device, with a standardized protocol applied to the wrist extensor muscle belly. Participants were evaluated under rest and wrist extension conditions using two bandaging techniques: spiral and figure-of-eight. Variations included single and double layers, 1/2 and 1/3 overlaps, and the presence or absence of additional compression pads. Certified physiotherapists trained performed all bandaging applications using short-stretch compression materials. The figure-of-eight wrapping technique consistently produced significantly higher sub-bandage pressures compared to the spiral technique in all conditions. Double bandaging generated 1.4 times more pressure than single-layer applications, while 1/3 overlap resulted in greater pressure than 1/2 overlap. The addition of compression pads increased resting pressure by approximately 5 mmHg, and wrist extension further augmented pressure by 4-8 mmHg. The highest pressures were observed with the figure-of-eight technique, double bandaging, and 1/3 overlap combined (<i>p</i> < 0.05). <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> These findings highlight the critical role of forearm bandaging technique, layering, and additional materials in determining sub-bandage pressure.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18168,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Lymphatic research and biology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Lymphatic research and biology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1089/lrb.2025.0026\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Lymphatic research and biology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/lrb.2025.0026","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Effects of Forearm Bandaging Technique, Muscle Contraction, and Additional Compression Pad Use on Sub-Bandage Pressure.
Background: This study aimed to evaluate the effects of forearm bandaging techniques, muscle contraction, and additional compression pad use on sub-bandage pressure. Methods and Results: Thirty-one individuals (26 females, 5 males) with no chronic or lymphatic-related conditions participated in the study. Sub-bandage pressure was measured using the Kikuhime device, with a standardized protocol applied to the wrist extensor muscle belly. Participants were evaluated under rest and wrist extension conditions using two bandaging techniques: spiral and figure-of-eight. Variations included single and double layers, 1/2 and 1/3 overlaps, and the presence or absence of additional compression pads. Certified physiotherapists trained performed all bandaging applications using short-stretch compression materials. The figure-of-eight wrapping technique consistently produced significantly higher sub-bandage pressures compared to the spiral technique in all conditions. Double bandaging generated 1.4 times more pressure than single-layer applications, while 1/3 overlap resulted in greater pressure than 1/2 overlap. The addition of compression pads increased resting pressure by approximately 5 mmHg, and wrist extension further augmented pressure by 4-8 mmHg. The highest pressures were observed with the figure-of-eight technique, double bandaging, and 1/3 overlap combined (p < 0.05). Conclusions: These findings highlight the critical role of forearm bandaging technique, layering, and additional materials in determining sub-bandage pressure.
期刊介绍:
Lymphatic Research and Biology delivers the most current peer-reviewed advances and developments in lymphatic biology and pathology from the world’s leading biomedical investigators. The Journal provides original research from a broad range of investigative disciplines, including genetics, biochemistry and biophysics, cellular and molecular biology, physiology and pharmacology, anatomy, developmental biology, and pathology.
Lymphatic Research and Biology coverage includes:
-Vasculogenesis and angiogenesis
-Genetics of lymphatic disorders
-Human lymphatic disease, including lymphatic insufficiency and associated vascular anomalies
-Physiology of intestinal fluid and protein balance
-Immunosurveillance and immune cell trafficking
-Tumor biology and metastasis
-Pharmacology
-Lymphatic imaging
-Endothelial and smooth muscle cell biology
-Inflammation, infection, and autoimmune disease