Sun-Ho Lee, Keun-Churl Chun, Jong-Seok Baik, Kwang-Il Koh, Sung-Hoon Kim, Churl Hong Chun
{"title":"关节镜下评估残馀ACL重建后独眼病变和临床结果:两种截短残馀保存技术的比较研究。","authors":"Sun-Ho Lee, Keun-Churl Chun, Jong-Seok Baik, Kwang-Il Koh, Sung-Hoon Kim, Churl Hong Chun","doi":"10.1007/s43465-025-01378-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>This study aimed to compare the prevalence of cyclops lesions and the clinical outcomes between two types of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction using a truncated remnant technique: tie with allograft ACL reconstruction and re-tensioning of remnant ACL with allograft ACL reconstruction.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This is a retrospective study of 58 cases of ACL reconstruction using a truncated remnant preservation technique performed by a single surgeon from March 2019 to December 2022. Second-look arthroscopy was performed in each group, and pathologic evaluation was performed focusing on cyclops lesions. The cases were divided into two groups according to the type of remnant technique: tie with allograft ACL reconstruction group (<i>n</i> = 16) and re-tensioning of remnant ACL with allograft ACL reconstruction group (<i>n</i> = 42). We evaluated the prevalence of cyclops lesions and the clinical outcomes in the two groups using follow-up magnetic resonance imaging and second-look arthroscopy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No difference in patient characteristics was observed between the two groups. The clinical outcomes showed no significant differences between the two groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Re-tensioning of remnant ACL with allograft significantly reduces cyclops lesion occurrence compared to the tie technique, while maintaining comparable clinical outcomes. This technique is particularly beneficial in cases with sufficient remnant tissue and minimizes complications associated with cyclops lesions, such as extension loss and the need for secondary surgical interventions. Therefore, we recommend re-tensioning of remnant ACL with allograft ACL reconstruction.</p><p><strong>Clinical trial number: </strong>Not applicable.</p>","PeriodicalId":13338,"journal":{"name":"Indian Journal of Orthopaedics","volume":"59 5","pages":"681-688"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12044084/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Arthroscopic Evaluation of Cyclops Lesions and Clinical Outcomes Following Remnant-Preserved ACL Reconstruction: A Comparative Study of Two Truncated Remnant Preservation Techniques.\",\"authors\":\"Sun-Ho Lee, Keun-Churl Chun, Jong-Seok Baik, Kwang-Il Koh, Sung-Hoon Kim, Churl Hong Chun\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s43465-025-01378-6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>This study aimed to compare the prevalence of cyclops lesions and the clinical outcomes between two types of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction using a truncated remnant technique: tie with allograft ACL reconstruction and re-tensioning of remnant ACL with allograft ACL reconstruction.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This is a retrospective study of 58 cases of ACL reconstruction using a truncated remnant preservation technique performed by a single surgeon from March 2019 to December 2022. Second-look arthroscopy was performed in each group, and pathologic evaluation was performed focusing on cyclops lesions. The cases were divided into two groups according to the type of remnant technique: tie with allograft ACL reconstruction group (<i>n</i> = 16) and re-tensioning of remnant ACL with allograft ACL reconstruction group (<i>n</i> = 42). We evaluated the prevalence of cyclops lesions and the clinical outcomes in the two groups using follow-up magnetic resonance imaging and second-look arthroscopy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No difference in patient characteristics was observed between the two groups. The clinical outcomes showed no significant differences between the two groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Re-tensioning of remnant ACL with allograft significantly reduces cyclops lesion occurrence compared to the tie technique, while maintaining comparable clinical outcomes. This technique is particularly beneficial in cases with sufficient remnant tissue and minimizes complications associated with cyclops lesions, such as extension loss and the need for secondary surgical interventions. Therefore, we recommend re-tensioning of remnant ACL with allograft ACL reconstruction.</p><p><strong>Clinical trial number: </strong>Not applicable.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13338,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Indian Journal of Orthopaedics\",\"volume\":\"59 5\",\"pages\":\"681-688\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12044084/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Indian Journal of Orthopaedics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s43465-025-01378-6\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/5/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Journal of Orthopaedics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s43465-025-01378-6","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/5/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Arthroscopic Evaluation of Cyclops Lesions and Clinical Outcomes Following Remnant-Preserved ACL Reconstruction: A Comparative Study of Two Truncated Remnant Preservation Techniques.
Introduction: This study aimed to compare the prevalence of cyclops lesions and the clinical outcomes between two types of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction using a truncated remnant technique: tie with allograft ACL reconstruction and re-tensioning of remnant ACL with allograft ACL reconstruction.
Materials and methods: This is a retrospective study of 58 cases of ACL reconstruction using a truncated remnant preservation technique performed by a single surgeon from March 2019 to December 2022. Second-look arthroscopy was performed in each group, and pathologic evaluation was performed focusing on cyclops lesions. The cases were divided into two groups according to the type of remnant technique: tie with allograft ACL reconstruction group (n = 16) and re-tensioning of remnant ACL with allograft ACL reconstruction group (n = 42). We evaluated the prevalence of cyclops lesions and the clinical outcomes in the two groups using follow-up magnetic resonance imaging and second-look arthroscopy.
Results: No difference in patient characteristics was observed between the two groups. The clinical outcomes showed no significant differences between the two groups.
Conclusion: Re-tensioning of remnant ACL with allograft significantly reduces cyclops lesion occurrence compared to the tie technique, while maintaining comparable clinical outcomes. This technique is particularly beneficial in cases with sufficient remnant tissue and minimizes complications associated with cyclops lesions, such as extension loss and the need for secondary surgical interventions. Therefore, we recommend re-tensioning of remnant ACL with allograft ACL reconstruction.
期刊介绍:
IJO welcomes articles that contribute to Orthopaedic knowledge from India and overseas. We publish articles dealing with clinical orthopaedics and basic research in orthopaedic surgery. Articles are accepted only for exclusive publication in the Indian Journal of Orthopaedics. Previously published articles, articles which are in peer-reviewed electronic publications in other journals, are not accepted by the Journal. Published articles and illustrations become the property of the Journal. The copyright remains with the journal. Studies must be carried out in accordance with World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki.