疑似罕见疾病患者的诊断费用。

IF 3.4 2区 医学 Q2 GENETICS & HEREDITY
Rick Glaubitz, Luise Heinrich, Falko Tesch, Martin Seifert, Katrin Christiane Reber, Ursula Marschall, Jochen Schmitt, Gabriele Müller
{"title":"疑似罕见疾病患者的诊断费用。","authors":"Rick Glaubitz, Luise Heinrich, Falko Tesch, Martin Seifert, Katrin Christiane Reber, Ursula Marschall, Jochen Schmitt, Gabriele Müller","doi":"10.1186/s13023-025-03751-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Patients with rare diseases often undergo a long diagnostic odyssey. However, there is little empirical evidence on the cost incurred during the diagnostic pathway for patients with suspected rare diseases. This study provides a comprehensive analysis of healthcare costs and utilization during the diagnostic pathway for a heterogeneous sample of patients with suspected rare diseases but unclear diagnosis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using claims data from five German statutory health insurance organizations for the years 2014-2019, we analyzed costs and healthcare utilization of 1,243 patients (aged 0 to 82 years) with suspected rare diseases referred to a rare disease center. A control cohort was assigned using 1:75 exact matching on age, sex and place of residence.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the years prior to referral to an expert center, healthcare utilization of patients with suspected rare diseases was, on average, substantially and significantly higher compared to a matched control cohort during the same observation period - e.g. in terms of the number of hospitalizations (3.1 (95%CI: 2.9-3.4) vs. 0.5 (95%CI: 0.5-0.5)), different diagnoses (50.0 (95%CI: 48.1-51.9) vs. 26.4 (95%CI: 26.2-26.5)), different active substances prescribed (12.7 (95%CI: 12.2-13.3) vs. 8.2 (95%CI: 8.2-8.3)) and the number of genetic tests (14.7 (95%CI: 12.6-16.7) vs. 0.3 (95%CI: 0.3-0.3)). We found evidence of heterogeneity in utilization by age and sex. On average, direct costs (inpatient, outpatient and prescription drug costs) of patients with suspected rare diseases during the diagnostic pathway were 7.6-fold higher than the costs of matched controls (€26,999 (95%CI: €23,751 - 30,247) vs. €3,561 (95% CI: € 3,455-3,667)). Inpatient costs were the main cost component, accounting for 62.5% of total costs.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The diagnostic odyssey of patients with suspected rare diseases is associated with extensive healthcare utilization and high cost. Against this background, new ways to shorten the diagnostic journey have a high potential to decrease the financial burden related to rare diseases.</p>","PeriodicalId":19651,"journal":{"name":"Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases","volume":"20 1","pages":"222"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12065212/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The cost of the diagnostic odyssey of patients with suspected rare diseases.\",\"authors\":\"Rick Glaubitz, Luise Heinrich, Falko Tesch, Martin Seifert, Katrin Christiane Reber, Ursula Marschall, Jochen Schmitt, Gabriele Müller\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s13023-025-03751-y\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Patients with rare diseases often undergo a long diagnostic odyssey. However, there is little empirical evidence on the cost incurred during the diagnostic pathway for patients with suspected rare diseases. This study provides a comprehensive analysis of healthcare costs and utilization during the diagnostic pathway for a heterogeneous sample of patients with suspected rare diseases but unclear diagnosis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using claims data from five German statutory health insurance organizations for the years 2014-2019, we analyzed costs and healthcare utilization of 1,243 patients (aged 0 to 82 years) with suspected rare diseases referred to a rare disease center. A control cohort was assigned using 1:75 exact matching on age, sex and place of residence.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the years prior to referral to an expert center, healthcare utilization of patients with suspected rare diseases was, on average, substantially and significantly higher compared to a matched control cohort during the same observation period - e.g. in terms of the number of hospitalizations (3.1 (95%CI: 2.9-3.4) vs. 0.5 (95%CI: 0.5-0.5)), different diagnoses (50.0 (95%CI: 48.1-51.9) vs. 26.4 (95%CI: 26.2-26.5)), different active substances prescribed (12.7 (95%CI: 12.2-13.3) vs. 8.2 (95%CI: 8.2-8.3)) and the number of genetic tests (14.7 (95%CI: 12.6-16.7) vs. 0.3 (95%CI: 0.3-0.3)). We found evidence of heterogeneity in utilization by age and sex. On average, direct costs (inpatient, outpatient and prescription drug costs) of patients with suspected rare diseases during the diagnostic pathway were 7.6-fold higher than the costs of matched controls (€26,999 (95%CI: €23,751 - 30,247) vs. €3,561 (95% CI: € 3,455-3,667)). Inpatient costs were the main cost component, accounting for 62.5% of total costs.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The diagnostic odyssey of patients with suspected rare diseases is associated with extensive healthcare utilization and high cost. Against this background, new ways to shorten the diagnostic journey have a high potential to decrease the financial burden related to rare diseases.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19651,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases\",\"volume\":\"20 1\",\"pages\":\"222\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12065212/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13023-025-03751-y\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GENETICS & HEREDITY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13023-025-03751-y","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GENETICS & HEREDITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:罕见疾病的患者往往经历一个漫长的诊断过程。然而,关于疑似罕见病患者在诊断途径中所产生的成本,目前还没有多少实证证据。本研究对疑似罕见病但诊断不明确的异质样本患者的诊断途径中的医疗费用和利用进行了全面分析。方法:利用2014-2019年德国五家法定健康保险组织的理赔数据,分析转介罕见病中心的1243例(年龄0 ~ 82岁)疑似罕见病患者的成本和医疗保健利用情况。对照队列按1:75精确匹配年龄、性别和居住地进行分配。结果:在转诊到专家中心之前的几年里,疑似罕见病患者在同一观察期内的医疗保健利用率平均显著高于匹配的对照队列,例如住院次数(3.1次(95%CI: 2.9-3.4次)vs. 0.5次(95%CI: 0.5-0.5次),不同诊断(50.0次(95%CI: 48.1-51.9次)vs. 26.4次(95%CI: 26.2-26.5次)),不同的原料药处方(12.7次(95%CI: 12.7次):12.2-13.3) vs. 8.2 (95%CI: 8.2-8.3))和基因检测次数(14.7 (95%CI: 12.6-16.7) vs. 0.3 (95%CI: 0.3-0.3))。我们发现了年龄和性别在药物利用方面存在异质性的证据。平均而言,疑似罕见病患者在诊断过程中的直接成本(住院、门诊和处方药成本)比匹配对照的成本高6.6倍(26,999欧元(95%CI: 23,751 - 30,247欧元)和3,561欧元(95%CI: 3,455-3,667欧元))。住院费用是主要的成本组成部分,占总成本的62.5%。结论:疑似罕见病患者的诊断过程与医疗保健利用广泛、费用高有关。在这种背景下,缩短诊断过程的新方法极有可能减轻与罕见病有关的经济负担。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The cost of the diagnostic odyssey of patients with suspected rare diseases.

Purpose: Patients with rare diseases often undergo a long diagnostic odyssey. However, there is little empirical evidence on the cost incurred during the diagnostic pathway for patients with suspected rare diseases. This study provides a comprehensive analysis of healthcare costs and utilization during the diagnostic pathway for a heterogeneous sample of patients with suspected rare diseases but unclear diagnosis.

Methods: Using claims data from five German statutory health insurance organizations for the years 2014-2019, we analyzed costs and healthcare utilization of 1,243 patients (aged 0 to 82 years) with suspected rare diseases referred to a rare disease center. A control cohort was assigned using 1:75 exact matching on age, sex and place of residence.

Results: In the years prior to referral to an expert center, healthcare utilization of patients with suspected rare diseases was, on average, substantially and significantly higher compared to a matched control cohort during the same observation period - e.g. in terms of the number of hospitalizations (3.1 (95%CI: 2.9-3.4) vs. 0.5 (95%CI: 0.5-0.5)), different diagnoses (50.0 (95%CI: 48.1-51.9) vs. 26.4 (95%CI: 26.2-26.5)), different active substances prescribed (12.7 (95%CI: 12.2-13.3) vs. 8.2 (95%CI: 8.2-8.3)) and the number of genetic tests (14.7 (95%CI: 12.6-16.7) vs. 0.3 (95%CI: 0.3-0.3)). We found evidence of heterogeneity in utilization by age and sex. On average, direct costs (inpatient, outpatient and prescription drug costs) of patients with suspected rare diseases during the diagnostic pathway were 7.6-fold higher than the costs of matched controls (€26,999 (95%CI: €23,751 - 30,247) vs. €3,561 (95% CI: € 3,455-3,667)). Inpatient costs were the main cost component, accounting for 62.5% of total costs.

Conclusions: The diagnostic odyssey of patients with suspected rare diseases is associated with extensive healthcare utilization and high cost. Against this background, new ways to shorten the diagnostic journey have a high potential to decrease the financial burden related to rare diseases.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases
Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases 医学-医学:研究与实验
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
8.10%
发文量
418
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that encompasses all aspects of rare diseases and orphan drugs. The journal publishes high-quality reviews on specific rare diseases. In addition, the journal may consider articles on clinical trial outcome reports, either positive or negative, and articles on public health issues in the field of rare diseases and orphan drugs. The journal does not accept case reports.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信