可切除和交界性可切除胰腺癌新辅助化疗期间,6毫米和10毫米全覆盖自扩张金属支架治疗恶性胆道远端梗阻的多中心比较研究。

IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Arata Sakai, Atsuhiro Masuda, Mamoru Takenaka, Hideyuki Shiomi, Shunsuke Omoto, Akihiro Yoshida, Ryota Nakano, Yuta Kawase, Shinya Kohashi, Yuzo Kodama
{"title":"可切除和交界性可切除胰腺癌新辅助化疗期间,6毫米和10毫米全覆盖自扩张金属支架治疗恶性胆道远端梗阻的多中心比较研究。","authors":"Arata Sakai, Atsuhiro Masuda, Mamoru Takenaka, Hideyuki Shiomi, Shunsuke Omoto, Akihiro Yoshida, Ryota Nakano, Yuta Kawase, Shinya Kohashi, Yuzo Kodama","doi":"10.1002/jhbp.12157","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The use of 10-mm fully covered self-expandable metal stents for preoperative bile duct drainage in patients with pancreatic cancer is increasing. However, these can cause complications (cholecystitis and pancreatitis) that may affect surgical outcomes. Smaller-diameter self-expandable metal stents may reduce these risks; however, the optimal stent size is unclear.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients with pancreatic cancer who underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy and placement of either 6 or 10-mm fully covered self-expandable metal stents for malignant distal biliary obstruction were included. The primary outcome was the 90-day incidence of recurrent biliary obstruction. Secondary outcomes were non-recurrent biliary obstruction and adverse events.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fifty-three patients were enrolled (27 and 26 patients received 6-mm and 10-mm self-expandable metal stents, respectively). The 90-day incidence of recurrent biliary obstruction of the 6-mm group was significantly higher than that of the 10-mm group (30.8% vs. 3.8%; p = 0.02). Stent migration occurred more frequently in the 6-mm group (26.9% vs. 0%; p = 0.01). Although non-recurrent biliary obstruction adverse events were less common in the 6-mm group, the difference was not statistically significant (11.1% vs. 23.0%; p = 0.29).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The 10-mm self-expandable metal stents were more suitable for the preoperative management of pancreatic cancer.</p>","PeriodicalId":16056,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hepato‐Biliary‐Pancreatic Sciences","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Multicenter Comparative Study of 6- and 10-mm Fully Covered Self-Expandable Metal Stents for Malignant Distal Biliary Obstruction During Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Resectable and Borderline Resectable Pancreatic Cancer.\",\"authors\":\"Arata Sakai, Atsuhiro Masuda, Mamoru Takenaka, Hideyuki Shiomi, Shunsuke Omoto, Akihiro Yoshida, Ryota Nakano, Yuta Kawase, Shinya Kohashi, Yuzo Kodama\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/jhbp.12157\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The use of 10-mm fully covered self-expandable metal stents for preoperative bile duct drainage in patients with pancreatic cancer is increasing. However, these can cause complications (cholecystitis and pancreatitis) that may affect surgical outcomes. Smaller-diameter self-expandable metal stents may reduce these risks; however, the optimal stent size is unclear.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients with pancreatic cancer who underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy and placement of either 6 or 10-mm fully covered self-expandable metal stents for malignant distal biliary obstruction were included. The primary outcome was the 90-day incidence of recurrent biliary obstruction. Secondary outcomes were non-recurrent biliary obstruction and adverse events.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fifty-three patients were enrolled (27 and 26 patients received 6-mm and 10-mm self-expandable metal stents, respectively). The 90-day incidence of recurrent biliary obstruction of the 6-mm group was significantly higher than that of the 10-mm group (30.8% vs. 3.8%; p = 0.02). Stent migration occurred more frequently in the 6-mm group (26.9% vs. 0%; p = 0.01). Although non-recurrent biliary obstruction adverse events were less common in the 6-mm group, the difference was not statistically significant (11.1% vs. 23.0%; p = 0.29).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The 10-mm self-expandable metal stents were more suitable for the preoperative management of pancreatic cancer.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16056,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Hepato‐Biliary‐Pancreatic Sciences\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Hepato‐Biliary‐Pancreatic Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/jhbp.12157\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Hepato‐Biliary‐Pancreatic Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jhbp.12157","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:在胰腺癌患者术前胆管引流中使用10mm全覆盖自膨胀金属支架的情况越来越多。然而,这些会引起并发症(胆囊炎和胰腺炎),可能会影响手术结果。直径较小的自膨胀金属支架可以降低这些风险;然而,最佳支架尺寸尚不清楚。方法:胰腺癌患者接受新辅助化疗并放置6或10毫米全覆盖自扩张金属支架治疗恶性胆道远端梗阻。主要终点是90天内复发性胆道梗阻的发生率。次要结局为非复发性胆道梗阻和不良事件。结果:53例患者入组(分别有27例和26例患者接受了6mm和10mm自膨胀金属支架)。6mm组90天胆道梗阻复发发生率显著高于10mm组(30.8% vs 3.8%;p = 0.02)。6mm组支架移位更频繁(26.9% vs 0%;p = 0.01)。虽然非复发性胆道梗阻不良事件在6-mm组中较少发生,但差异无统计学意义(11.1%比23.0%;p = 0.29)。结论:10mm自膨胀金属支架更适合于胰腺癌的术前治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Multicenter Comparative Study of 6- and 10-mm Fully Covered Self-Expandable Metal Stents for Malignant Distal Biliary Obstruction During Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Resectable and Borderline Resectable Pancreatic Cancer.

Background: The use of 10-mm fully covered self-expandable metal stents for preoperative bile duct drainage in patients with pancreatic cancer is increasing. However, these can cause complications (cholecystitis and pancreatitis) that may affect surgical outcomes. Smaller-diameter self-expandable metal stents may reduce these risks; however, the optimal stent size is unclear.

Methods: Patients with pancreatic cancer who underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy and placement of either 6 or 10-mm fully covered self-expandable metal stents for malignant distal biliary obstruction were included. The primary outcome was the 90-day incidence of recurrent biliary obstruction. Secondary outcomes were non-recurrent biliary obstruction and adverse events.

Results: Fifty-three patients were enrolled (27 and 26 patients received 6-mm and 10-mm self-expandable metal stents, respectively). The 90-day incidence of recurrent biliary obstruction of the 6-mm group was significantly higher than that of the 10-mm group (30.8% vs. 3.8%; p = 0.02). Stent migration occurred more frequently in the 6-mm group (26.9% vs. 0%; p = 0.01). Although non-recurrent biliary obstruction adverse events were less common in the 6-mm group, the difference was not statistically significant (11.1% vs. 23.0%; p = 0.29).

Conclusions: The 10-mm self-expandable metal stents were more suitable for the preoperative management of pancreatic cancer.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Hepato‐Biliary‐Pancreatic Sciences
Journal of Hepato‐Biliary‐Pancreatic Sciences GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY-SURGERY
自引率
10.00%
发文量
178
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Sciences (JHBPS) is the leading peer-reviewed journal in the field of hepato-biliary-pancreatic sciences. JHBPS publishes articles dealing with clinical research as well as translational research on all aspects of this field. Coverage includes Original Article, Review Article, Images of Interest, Rapid Communication and an announcement section. Letters to the Editor and comments on the journal’s policies or content are also included. JHBPS welcomes submissions from surgeons, physicians, endoscopists, radiologists, oncologists, and pathologists.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信