丛集性头痛诊断延迟及其预测因素:一项荟萃分析的系统综述。

IF 7.3 1区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
E K Van Obberghen, R Fabre, M Lanteri-Minet
{"title":"丛集性头痛诊断延迟及其预测因素:一项荟萃分析的系统综述。","authors":"E K Van Obberghen, R Fabre, M Lanteri-Minet","doi":"10.1186/s10194-025-02001-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Despite its characteristic clinical expression, cluster headache (CH) often remains unrecognized in clinical practice, with patients suffering from CH having to wait a long time before receiving a correct diagnosis and benefit from appropriate treatment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This work is a systematic review of data accessible through PubMed and published up to December 2024, focusing on the delay in CH diagnosis and its predictors. A meta-analysis was performed to estimate the mean CH diagnostic delay using the inverse of variance as the weight. A qualitative analysis was performed to identify predictors of this delay.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the 108 studies identified, 22 and 11 were selected for the qualitative analysis and meta-analysis respectively. These selected studies included a total of 8654 subjects (range 23-1604). This whole population was composed of 6383 men, 2180 women and 91 subjects with sex not specified. CH form was indicated for 7177 subjects with 5808, 1182 and 187 with episodic CH, chronic CH and undetermined form respectively. Meta-analysis estimated the overall CH diagnostic delay at 10,43 years (95% CI [9.09; 11.77]) with a reduction in the CH diagnostic delay over time since the sixties and the continuation of such a reduction every decade since 2000. Qualitative analyses identified several predictors of this diagnostic delay. Autonomic symptoms were associated with a decrease in the delay of diagnosis, whereas lower age of CH onset, alternating attack side and nocturnal headaches were associated with an increase in the delay of diagnosis.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This systematic review including meta-analysis confirms an important unmet need in terms of CH diagnosis. Further work is needed to identify more precisely the predictors of this delay for better management of patients suffering from CH. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The systematic review protocol was registered with the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) on 01/10/2025 (registration number: CRD42025630779).</p>","PeriodicalId":16013,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Headache and Pain","volume":"26 1","pages":"71"},"PeriodicalIF":7.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11980061/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cluster headache diagnostic delay and its predictors: a systematic review with a meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"E K Van Obberghen, R Fabre, M Lanteri-Minet\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s10194-025-02001-7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Despite its characteristic clinical expression, cluster headache (CH) often remains unrecognized in clinical practice, with patients suffering from CH having to wait a long time before receiving a correct diagnosis and benefit from appropriate treatment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This work is a systematic review of data accessible through PubMed and published up to December 2024, focusing on the delay in CH diagnosis and its predictors. A meta-analysis was performed to estimate the mean CH diagnostic delay using the inverse of variance as the weight. A qualitative analysis was performed to identify predictors of this delay.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the 108 studies identified, 22 and 11 were selected for the qualitative analysis and meta-analysis respectively. These selected studies included a total of 8654 subjects (range 23-1604). This whole population was composed of 6383 men, 2180 women and 91 subjects with sex not specified. CH form was indicated for 7177 subjects with 5808, 1182 and 187 with episodic CH, chronic CH and undetermined form respectively. Meta-analysis estimated the overall CH diagnostic delay at 10,43 years (95% CI [9.09; 11.77]) with a reduction in the CH diagnostic delay over time since the sixties and the continuation of such a reduction every decade since 2000. Qualitative analyses identified several predictors of this diagnostic delay. Autonomic symptoms were associated with a decrease in the delay of diagnosis, whereas lower age of CH onset, alternating attack side and nocturnal headaches were associated with an increase in the delay of diagnosis.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This systematic review including meta-analysis confirms an important unmet need in terms of CH diagnosis. Further work is needed to identify more precisely the predictors of this delay for better management of patients suffering from CH. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The systematic review protocol was registered with the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) on 01/10/2025 (registration number: CRD42025630779).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16013,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Headache and Pain\",\"volume\":\"26 1\",\"pages\":\"71\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11980061/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Headache and Pain\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s10194-025-02001-7\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Headache and Pain","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s10194-025-02001-7","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:尽管丛集性头痛(CH)具有独特的临床表现,但在临床实践中往往未被认识到,患者需要等待很长时间才能得到正确的诊断和适当的治疗。方法:本工作是对PubMed上截止到2024年12月发表的数据进行系统回顾,重点关注CH诊断的延迟及其预测因素。采用方差倒数作为权重,进行了一项荟萃分析来估计平均CH诊断延迟。进行了定性分析,以确定这种延迟的预测因素。结果:在108项研究中,分别选择22项和11项进行定性分析和meta分析。这些选定的研究共包括8654名受试者(范围23-1604)。整个人群由6383名男性、2180名女性和91名性别不详的受试者组成。分别有5808例、1182例和187例发作型、慢性型和不确定型ch7例,共7177例。meta分析估计总诊断延迟为10,43年(95% CI [9.09;11.77])随着时间的推移,自60年代以来,慢性阻塞性肺病诊断延误的减少,自2000年以来,这种减少每十年持续一次。定性分析确定了这种诊断延迟的几个预测因素。自主神经症状与延迟诊断的减少有关,而较低的CH发病年龄、交替发作侧和夜间头痛与延迟诊断的增加有关。结论:本系统综述包括荟萃分析证实了CH诊断方面一个重要的未被满足的需求。需要进一步的工作来更准确地确定这种延迟的预测因素,以便更好地管理CH患者。试验注册:该系统评价方案于2025年10月1日在国际前瞻性系统评价注册(PROSPERO)注册(注册号:CRD42025630779)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Cluster headache diagnostic delay and its predictors: a systematic review with a meta-analysis.

Background: Despite its characteristic clinical expression, cluster headache (CH) often remains unrecognized in clinical practice, with patients suffering from CH having to wait a long time before receiving a correct diagnosis and benefit from appropriate treatment.

Methods: This work is a systematic review of data accessible through PubMed and published up to December 2024, focusing on the delay in CH diagnosis and its predictors. A meta-analysis was performed to estimate the mean CH diagnostic delay using the inverse of variance as the weight. A qualitative analysis was performed to identify predictors of this delay.

Results: Among the 108 studies identified, 22 and 11 were selected for the qualitative analysis and meta-analysis respectively. These selected studies included a total of 8654 subjects (range 23-1604). This whole population was composed of 6383 men, 2180 women and 91 subjects with sex not specified. CH form was indicated for 7177 subjects with 5808, 1182 and 187 with episodic CH, chronic CH and undetermined form respectively. Meta-analysis estimated the overall CH diagnostic delay at 10,43 years (95% CI [9.09; 11.77]) with a reduction in the CH diagnostic delay over time since the sixties and the continuation of such a reduction every decade since 2000. Qualitative analyses identified several predictors of this diagnostic delay. Autonomic symptoms were associated with a decrease in the delay of diagnosis, whereas lower age of CH onset, alternating attack side and nocturnal headaches were associated with an increase in the delay of diagnosis.

Conclusion: This systematic review including meta-analysis confirms an important unmet need in terms of CH diagnosis. Further work is needed to identify more precisely the predictors of this delay for better management of patients suffering from CH. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The systematic review protocol was registered with the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) on 01/10/2025 (registration number: CRD42025630779).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Headache and Pain
Journal of Headache and Pain 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
11.80
自引率
13.50%
发文量
143
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Headache and Pain, a peer-reviewed open-access journal published under the BMC brand, a part of Springer Nature, is dedicated to researchers engaged in all facets of headache and related pain syndromes. It encompasses epidemiology, public health, basic science, translational medicine, clinical trials, and real-world data. With a multidisciplinary approach, The Journal of Headache and Pain addresses headache medicine and related pain syndromes across all medical disciplines. It particularly encourages submissions in clinical, translational, and basic science fields, focusing on pain management, genetics, neurology, and internal medicine. The journal publishes research articles, reviews, letters to the Editor, as well as consensus articles and guidelines, aimed at promoting best practices in managing patients with headaches and related pain.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信