Sheila A Flanagan, Brian C J Moore, Angela M Wilson, Fiona C Gabrielczyk, Annabel MacFarlane, Kanad Mandke, Usha Goswami
{"title":"发展性阅读障碍儿童双耳颞精细结构敏感性研究。","authors":"Sheila A Flanagan, Brian C J Moore, Angela M Wilson, Fiona C Gabrielczyk, Annabel MacFarlane, Kanad Mandke, Usha Goswami","doi":"10.1044/2025_JSLHR-24-00543","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Atypical temporal processing is thought to be involved in the phonological difficulties that characterize children with developmental dyslexia (DYS). The temporal sampling (TS) theory of dyslexia posits that the processing of low-frequency envelope modulations is impaired, but the processing of binaural temporal fine structure (TFS) is preserved in children with DYS.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Binaural TFS sensitivity was assessed for children with DYS utilizing the methods developed by Flanagan et al. for typically developing (TD) children. New results for 58 children with DYS (ages 7-9.6 years) were compared with those for 30 age-matched controls (chronological age-matched [CA]) reported in Flanagan et al. Threshold frequency, that is, the highest frequency at which an interaural phase difference (IPD) of 30° or 180° could be distinguished from an IPD of 0° was determined using a two-interval forced-choice task in which the frequency was adaptively varied, with stimuli presented via headphones.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>For those who were able to perform the task above chance, the median TFS<sub>180</sub> thresholds were: DYS = 886 Hz; CA = 999Hz. For TFS<sub>30</sub> thresholds: DYS = 388 Hz; CA = 442 Hz. A linear mixed-effects model with dependent variable threshold frequency and fixed effects of group (CA and DYS) and phase (180° and 30°) showed no significant difference between groups (<i>p</i> > .05) and no significant interaction between group and phase. Both groups performed more poorly than young typically hearing adults (<i>p</i> < .001) for both phases.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Binaural TFS sensitivity does not differ significantly for children with DYS and TD children. For both groups, the development of binaural TFS sensitivity is protracted. The results are consistent with TS theory.</p>","PeriodicalId":51254,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research","volume":"68 5","pages":"2569-2583"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Binaural Temporal Fine Structure Sensitivity for Children With Developmental Dyslexia.\",\"authors\":\"Sheila A Flanagan, Brian C J Moore, Angela M Wilson, Fiona C Gabrielczyk, Annabel MacFarlane, Kanad Mandke, Usha Goswami\",\"doi\":\"10.1044/2025_JSLHR-24-00543\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Atypical temporal processing is thought to be involved in the phonological difficulties that characterize children with developmental dyslexia (DYS). The temporal sampling (TS) theory of dyslexia posits that the processing of low-frequency envelope modulations is impaired, but the processing of binaural temporal fine structure (TFS) is preserved in children with DYS.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Binaural TFS sensitivity was assessed for children with DYS utilizing the methods developed by Flanagan et al. for typically developing (TD) children. New results for 58 children with DYS (ages 7-9.6 years) were compared with those for 30 age-matched controls (chronological age-matched [CA]) reported in Flanagan et al. Threshold frequency, that is, the highest frequency at which an interaural phase difference (IPD) of 30° or 180° could be distinguished from an IPD of 0° was determined using a two-interval forced-choice task in which the frequency was adaptively varied, with stimuli presented via headphones.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>For those who were able to perform the task above chance, the median TFS<sub>180</sub> thresholds were: DYS = 886 Hz; CA = 999Hz. For TFS<sub>30</sub> thresholds: DYS = 388 Hz; CA = 442 Hz. A linear mixed-effects model with dependent variable threshold frequency and fixed effects of group (CA and DYS) and phase (180° and 30°) showed no significant difference between groups (<i>p</i> > .05) and no significant interaction between group and phase. Both groups performed more poorly than young typically hearing adults (<i>p</i> < .001) for both phases.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Binaural TFS sensitivity does not differ significantly for children with DYS and TD children. For both groups, the development of binaural TFS sensitivity is protracted. The results are consistent with TS theory.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51254,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research\",\"volume\":\"68 5\",\"pages\":\"2569-2583\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1044/2025_JSLHR-24-00543\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/4/24 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1044/2025_JSLHR-24-00543","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Binaural Temporal Fine Structure Sensitivity for Children With Developmental Dyslexia.
Purpose: Atypical temporal processing is thought to be involved in the phonological difficulties that characterize children with developmental dyslexia (DYS). The temporal sampling (TS) theory of dyslexia posits that the processing of low-frequency envelope modulations is impaired, but the processing of binaural temporal fine structure (TFS) is preserved in children with DYS.
Method: Binaural TFS sensitivity was assessed for children with DYS utilizing the methods developed by Flanagan et al. for typically developing (TD) children. New results for 58 children with DYS (ages 7-9.6 years) were compared with those for 30 age-matched controls (chronological age-matched [CA]) reported in Flanagan et al. Threshold frequency, that is, the highest frequency at which an interaural phase difference (IPD) of 30° or 180° could be distinguished from an IPD of 0° was determined using a two-interval forced-choice task in which the frequency was adaptively varied, with stimuli presented via headphones.
Results: For those who were able to perform the task above chance, the median TFS180 thresholds were: DYS = 886 Hz; CA = 999Hz. For TFS30 thresholds: DYS = 388 Hz; CA = 442 Hz. A linear mixed-effects model with dependent variable threshold frequency and fixed effects of group (CA and DYS) and phase (180° and 30°) showed no significant difference between groups (p > .05) and no significant interaction between group and phase. Both groups performed more poorly than young typically hearing adults (p < .001) for both phases.
Conclusions: Binaural TFS sensitivity does not differ significantly for children with DYS and TD children. For both groups, the development of binaural TFS sensitivity is protracted. The results are consistent with TS theory.
期刊介绍:
Mission: JSLHR publishes peer-reviewed research and other scholarly articles on the normal and disordered processes in speech, language, hearing, and related areas such as cognition, oral-motor function, and swallowing. The journal is an international outlet for both basic research on communication processes and clinical research pertaining to screening, diagnosis, and management of communication disorders as well as the etiologies and characteristics of these disorders. JSLHR seeks to advance evidence-based practice by disseminating the results of new studies as well as providing a forum for critical reviews and meta-analyses of previously published work.
Scope: The broad field of communication sciences and disorders, including speech production and perception; anatomy and physiology of speech and voice; genetics, biomechanics, and other basic sciences pertaining to human communication; mastication and swallowing; speech disorders; voice disorders; development of speech, language, or hearing in children; normal language processes; language disorders; disorders of hearing and balance; psychoacoustics; and anatomy and physiology of hearing.