{"title":"主动脉弓疾病混合胸血管内主动脉修复术对预期寿命的影响。","authors":"Tomoaki Kudo, Toru Kuratani, Ryoto Sakaniwa, Yoshiki Sawa, Shigeru Miyagawa","doi":"10.1007/s10047-025-01503-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study aimed to investigate whether the efficacy of proximal landing zones (LZs) 0, 1, and 2 in hybrid thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) without cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) in elderly patients can broaden aortic arch surgical eligibility from the perspective of a lifetime loss. From April 2008 to March 2020, 254 patients who underwent LZs 0, 1, and 2 hybrid TEVAR without CPB were enrolled (zone 0 in 41, zone 1 in 82, and zone 2 in 131 patients). The patients had a median age of 73 years, with a median follow-up period of 5.8 years. The median operative time was 172 min, the median postoperative hospital stay was 11 days, and the discharge rate to home was 95.3%. The survival rate, aorta-related death-free rate, and aortic events-free rate at 10 years were 72.8%, 97.0%, and 88.5%. A multivariable Cox proportional hazard regression analysis showed that age (p < 0.001), preoperative stroke (p = 0.042), and an occurrence of 30-day aortic events (p = 0.022) were significant risk factors for all-cause death. The lifetime loss for 75, 80, 85, and ≥ 90-year-old patients at the time of surgery was 0.2, 0.1, 0, and 0 years. Despite the high risk of surgical management of aortic arch diseases, this study revealed that LZs 0, 1, and 2 hybrid TEVAR without CPB in ≥ 75-year-old patients can be expected to result in a life expectancy similar to the standard life expectancy. Advanced age alone should not exclude surgical treatment for patients with arch diseases.</p>","PeriodicalId":15177,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Artificial Organs","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of hybrid thoracic endovascular aortic repair for aortic arch diseases on life expectancy.\",\"authors\":\"Tomoaki Kudo, Toru Kuratani, Ryoto Sakaniwa, Yoshiki Sawa, Shigeru Miyagawa\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10047-025-01503-0\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This study aimed to investigate whether the efficacy of proximal landing zones (LZs) 0, 1, and 2 in hybrid thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) without cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) in elderly patients can broaden aortic arch surgical eligibility from the perspective of a lifetime loss. From April 2008 to March 2020, 254 patients who underwent LZs 0, 1, and 2 hybrid TEVAR without CPB were enrolled (zone 0 in 41, zone 1 in 82, and zone 2 in 131 patients). The patients had a median age of 73 years, with a median follow-up period of 5.8 years. The median operative time was 172 min, the median postoperative hospital stay was 11 days, and the discharge rate to home was 95.3%. The survival rate, aorta-related death-free rate, and aortic events-free rate at 10 years were 72.8%, 97.0%, and 88.5%. A multivariable Cox proportional hazard regression analysis showed that age (p < 0.001), preoperative stroke (p = 0.042), and an occurrence of 30-day aortic events (p = 0.022) were significant risk factors for all-cause death. The lifetime loss for 75, 80, 85, and ≥ 90-year-old patients at the time of surgery was 0.2, 0.1, 0, and 0 years. Despite the high risk of surgical management of aortic arch diseases, this study revealed that LZs 0, 1, and 2 hybrid TEVAR without CPB in ≥ 75-year-old patients can be expected to result in a life expectancy similar to the standard life expectancy. Advanced age alone should not exclude surgical treatment for patients with arch diseases.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15177,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Artificial Organs\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Artificial Organs\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10047-025-01503-0\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Artificial Organs","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10047-025-01503-0","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Impact of hybrid thoracic endovascular aortic repair for aortic arch diseases on life expectancy.
This study aimed to investigate whether the efficacy of proximal landing zones (LZs) 0, 1, and 2 in hybrid thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) without cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) in elderly patients can broaden aortic arch surgical eligibility from the perspective of a lifetime loss. From April 2008 to March 2020, 254 patients who underwent LZs 0, 1, and 2 hybrid TEVAR without CPB were enrolled (zone 0 in 41, zone 1 in 82, and zone 2 in 131 patients). The patients had a median age of 73 years, with a median follow-up period of 5.8 years. The median operative time was 172 min, the median postoperative hospital stay was 11 days, and the discharge rate to home was 95.3%. The survival rate, aorta-related death-free rate, and aortic events-free rate at 10 years were 72.8%, 97.0%, and 88.5%. A multivariable Cox proportional hazard regression analysis showed that age (p < 0.001), preoperative stroke (p = 0.042), and an occurrence of 30-day aortic events (p = 0.022) were significant risk factors for all-cause death. The lifetime loss for 75, 80, 85, and ≥ 90-year-old patients at the time of surgery was 0.2, 0.1, 0, and 0 years. Despite the high risk of surgical management of aortic arch diseases, this study revealed that LZs 0, 1, and 2 hybrid TEVAR without CPB in ≥ 75-year-old patients can be expected to result in a life expectancy similar to the standard life expectancy. Advanced age alone should not exclude surgical treatment for patients with arch diseases.
期刊介绍:
The aim of the Journal of Artificial Organs is to introduce to colleagues worldwide a broad spectrum of important new achievements in the field of artificial organs, ranging from fundamental research to clinical applications. The scope of the Journal of Artificial Organs encompasses but is not restricted to blood purification, cardiovascular intervention, biomaterials, and artificial metabolic organs. Additionally, the journal will cover technical and industrial innovations. Membership in the Japanese Society for Artificial Organs is not a prerequisite for submission.