身体圆度指数与便秘的负相关:来自NHANES的见解。

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q3 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Lingting Chen, Huirong Xiao, Xuchao Yu, Bingbin Huang, Sirong Guo, Ting Yuan, Siyang Deng
{"title":"身体圆度指数与便秘的负相关:来自NHANES的见解。","authors":"Lingting Chen, Huirong Xiao, Xuchao Yu, Bingbin Huang, Sirong Guo, Ting Yuan, Siyang Deng","doi":"10.1186/s41043-025-00886-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Backgrounds: </strong>The relationship between body roundness index (BRI), a metric that distinguishes heterogeneity in fat distribution, and constipation is unclear. This study is the first to investigate the association between BRI and constipation based on the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) in the United States, providing a new perspective on the mechanisms of obesity-related gastrointestinal dysfunction.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This cross-sectional study utilized data from the NHANES conducted between 2005 and 2010. Constipation was diagnosed based on the Bristol Stool Form Scale (BSFS). Weighted logistic regression models were employed to assess the association between BRI and constipation prevalence. Restricted cubic splines (RCS) and piecewise linear regression models were applied to evaluate non-linear relationships between BRI and constipation. Propensity score matching (PSM) was implemented to match constipated and non-constipated populations with similar baseline characteristics. Subsequent analyses were conducted to investigate the correlation between BRI and constipation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 12,732 eligible participants were included. A negative correlation was observed between BRI and constipation prevalence, with an adjusted odds ratio (OR) of 0.87 (95% CI: 0.80, 0.95) after controlling for all covariates. When BRI was categorized into quartiles (Q1-Q4), both Q3 and Q4 groups exhibited significantly reduced constipation risk compared to Q1 (OR = 0.72, 95% CI: 0.54-0.97; OR = 0.63, 95% CI: 0.46-0.87). The RCS regression model revealed a linear inverse association between BRI and constipation risk (nonlinearity test P = 0.083). Subgroup analyses identified significant interaction effects of BRI with age, alcohol consumption status, and hypertension on constipation risk (interaction P < 0.05). Post PSM, constipation patients demonstrated higher BRI levels than non-constipation counterparts (P = 0.013).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>An inverse association was observed between BRI and constipation risk in U.S. adults, suggesting that lower BRI levels may correlate with raised constipation incidence. This underscores the critical importance of maintaining optimal BRI levels for constipation prevention. Further research is warranted to elucidate the underlying mechanisms governing this association.</p>","PeriodicalId":15969,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Health, Population, and Nutrition","volume":"44 1","pages":"149"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12065198/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Negative association between body roundness index and constipation: insights from NHANES.\",\"authors\":\"Lingting Chen, Huirong Xiao, Xuchao Yu, Bingbin Huang, Sirong Guo, Ting Yuan, Siyang Deng\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s41043-025-00886-3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Backgrounds: </strong>The relationship between body roundness index (BRI), a metric that distinguishes heterogeneity in fat distribution, and constipation is unclear. This study is the first to investigate the association between BRI and constipation based on the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) in the United States, providing a new perspective on the mechanisms of obesity-related gastrointestinal dysfunction.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This cross-sectional study utilized data from the NHANES conducted between 2005 and 2010. Constipation was diagnosed based on the Bristol Stool Form Scale (BSFS). Weighted logistic regression models were employed to assess the association between BRI and constipation prevalence. Restricted cubic splines (RCS) and piecewise linear regression models were applied to evaluate non-linear relationships between BRI and constipation. Propensity score matching (PSM) was implemented to match constipated and non-constipated populations with similar baseline characteristics. Subsequent analyses were conducted to investigate the correlation between BRI and constipation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 12,732 eligible participants were included. A negative correlation was observed between BRI and constipation prevalence, with an adjusted odds ratio (OR) of 0.87 (95% CI: 0.80, 0.95) after controlling for all covariates. When BRI was categorized into quartiles (Q1-Q4), both Q3 and Q4 groups exhibited significantly reduced constipation risk compared to Q1 (OR = 0.72, 95% CI: 0.54-0.97; OR = 0.63, 95% CI: 0.46-0.87). The RCS regression model revealed a linear inverse association between BRI and constipation risk (nonlinearity test P = 0.083). Subgroup analyses identified significant interaction effects of BRI with age, alcohol consumption status, and hypertension on constipation risk (interaction P < 0.05). Post PSM, constipation patients demonstrated higher BRI levels than non-constipation counterparts (P = 0.013).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>An inverse association was observed between BRI and constipation risk in U.S. adults, suggesting that lower BRI levels may correlate with raised constipation incidence. This underscores the critical importance of maintaining optimal BRI levels for constipation prevention. Further research is warranted to elucidate the underlying mechanisms governing this association.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15969,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Health, Population, and Nutrition\",\"volume\":\"44 1\",\"pages\":\"149\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12065198/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Health, Population, and Nutrition\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s41043-025-00886-3\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Health, Population, and Nutrition","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s41043-025-00886-3","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:身体圆度指数(BRI)是一种区分脂肪分布异质性的指标,与便秘之间的关系尚不清楚。本研究首次基于美国国家健康与营养调查(National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, NHANES)调查BRI与便秘之间的关系,为研究肥胖相关胃肠功能障碍的机制提供了新的视角。方法:本横断面研究利用了2005年至2010年NHANES进行的数据。根据布里斯托大便形式量表(BSFS)诊断便秘。采用加权logistic回归模型评估BRI与便秘患病率之间的关系。应用限制三次样条(RCS)和分段线性回归模型来评估BRI与便秘之间的非线性关系。采用倾向评分匹配(PSM)来匹配具有相似基线特征的便秘和非便秘人群。随后进行分析以调查BRI与便秘之间的相关性。结果:共纳入12732名符合条件的参与者。在控制所有协变量后,观察到BRI与便秘患病率呈负相关,校正优势比(OR)为0.87 (95% CI: 0.80, 0.95)。当BRI被分为四分位数(Q1-Q4)时,与Q1组相比,Q3组和Q4组便秘风险均显著降低(OR = 0.72, 95% CI: 0.54-0.97;Or = 0.63, 95% ci: 0.46-0.87)。RCS回归模型显示BRI与便秘风险呈线性负相关(非线性检验P = 0.083)。亚组分析发现,BRI与年龄、饮酒状况和高血压对便秘风险有显著的相互作用(相互作用P)。结论:在美国成年人中,BRI与便秘风险呈负相关,表明较低的BRI水平可能与便秘发生率升高相关。这强调了维持最佳BRI水平对预防便秘的重要性。需要进一步的研究来阐明控制这种关联的潜在机制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Negative association between body roundness index and constipation: insights from NHANES.

Backgrounds: The relationship between body roundness index (BRI), a metric that distinguishes heterogeneity in fat distribution, and constipation is unclear. This study is the first to investigate the association between BRI and constipation based on the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) in the United States, providing a new perspective on the mechanisms of obesity-related gastrointestinal dysfunction.

Methods: This cross-sectional study utilized data from the NHANES conducted between 2005 and 2010. Constipation was diagnosed based on the Bristol Stool Form Scale (BSFS). Weighted logistic regression models were employed to assess the association between BRI and constipation prevalence. Restricted cubic splines (RCS) and piecewise linear regression models were applied to evaluate non-linear relationships between BRI and constipation. Propensity score matching (PSM) was implemented to match constipated and non-constipated populations with similar baseline characteristics. Subsequent analyses were conducted to investigate the correlation between BRI and constipation.

Results: A total of 12,732 eligible participants were included. A negative correlation was observed between BRI and constipation prevalence, with an adjusted odds ratio (OR) of 0.87 (95% CI: 0.80, 0.95) after controlling for all covariates. When BRI was categorized into quartiles (Q1-Q4), both Q3 and Q4 groups exhibited significantly reduced constipation risk compared to Q1 (OR = 0.72, 95% CI: 0.54-0.97; OR = 0.63, 95% CI: 0.46-0.87). The RCS regression model revealed a linear inverse association between BRI and constipation risk (nonlinearity test P = 0.083). Subgroup analyses identified significant interaction effects of BRI with age, alcohol consumption status, and hypertension on constipation risk (interaction P < 0.05). Post PSM, constipation patients demonstrated higher BRI levels than non-constipation counterparts (P = 0.013).

Conclusion: An inverse association was observed between BRI and constipation risk in U.S. adults, suggesting that lower BRI levels may correlate with raised constipation incidence. This underscores the critical importance of maintaining optimal BRI levels for constipation prevention. Further research is warranted to elucidate the underlying mechanisms governing this association.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Health, Population, and Nutrition
Journal of Health, Population, and Nutrition 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
49
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Health, Population and Nutrition brings together research on all aspects of issues related to population, nutrition and health. The journal publishes articles across a broad range of topics including global health, maternal and child health, nutrition, common illnesses and determinants of population health.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信