{"title":"自动脑容量测量在ATN框架内对ADNI参与者分层的补充作用。","authors":"Ilaria Ricchi, Alessandra Griffa, Ricardo Corredor-Jerez, Jonas Richiardi, Jean-François Démonet, Gilles Allali, Bénédicte Maréchal, Olivier Rouaud","doi":"10.1177/13872877251339840","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BackgroundThe amyloid, tau, neurodegeneration (ATN) framework provides a biological staging model of Alzheimer's disease (AD) using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), or positron emission tomography (PET) biomarkers. MRI, being non-invasive, accessible, and cost-effective, holds promise as a biomarker.ObjectiveTo evaluate the utility of MRI-based automated brain volumetry in classifying cognitive impairment severity-cognitively unimpaired (CU), mild cognitive impairment (MCI), and dementia-as well as ATN profiles, independently.MethodsWe analyzed 394 subjects from the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative. First, we assessed how well MRI volumetry stratifies cognitive stages. Next, we tested its ability to distinguish A + T + N+ from A-T-N- individuals while classifying clinical stages. Finally, we evaluated its predictive power for cognitive severity in A + T+ and A-T- subgroups, irrespective of neurodegeneration (N), to examine the added value of volumetry across AT profiles.ResultsMRI volumetry showed comparable performance to established biomarkers in identifying CU, MCI, and dementia, and offered complementary value when combined with phosphorylated tau. Hippocampal and temporal gray matter volumes distinguished A + T + N+ from A-T-N- classes with accuracies of 0.81 and 0.78, respectively. In A + T+ versus A-T- comparisons, the highest classification performance for cognitive severity was observed in the A-T- group.ConclusionsMRI-based brain volumetry can effectively classify cognitive stages and distinguish biological subtypes in AD. It is a promising tool for clinical staging and predicting impairment severity, especially when used alongside phosphorylated tau.</p>","PeriodicalId":14929,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Alzheimer's Disease","volume":" ","pages":"13872877251339840"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The complementary role of automated brain volumetry to stratify ADNI participants within the ATN framework.\",\"authors\":\"Ilaria Ricchi, Alessandra Griffa, Ricardo Corredor-Jerez, Jonas Richiardi, Jean-François Démonet, Gilles Allali, Bénédicte Maréchal, Olivier Rouaud\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/13872877251339840\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>BackgroundThe amyloid, tau, neurodegeneration (ATN) framework provides a biological staging model of Alzheimer's disease (AD) using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), or positron emission tomography (PET) biomarkers. MRI, being non-invasive, accessible, and cost-effective, holds promise as a biomarker.ObjectiveTo evaluate the utility of MRI-based automated brain volumetry in classifying cognitive impairment severity-cognitively unimpaired (CU), mild cognitive impairment (MCI), and dementia-as well as ATN profiles, independently.MethodsWe analyzed 394 subjects from the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative. First, we assessed how well MRI volumetry stratifies cognitive stages. Next, we tested its ability to distinguish A + T + N+ from A-T-N- individuals while classifying clinical stages. Finally, we evaluated its predictive power for cognitive severity in A + T+ and A-T- subgroups, irrespective of neurodegeneration (N), to examine the added value of volumetry across AT profiles.ResultsMRI volumetry showed comparable performance to established biomarkers in identifying CU, MCI, and dementia, and offered complementary value when combined with phosphorylated tau. Hippocampal and temporal gray matter volumes distinguished A + T + N+ from A-T-N- classes with accuracies of 0.81 and 0.78, respectively. In A + T+ versus A-T- comparisons, the highest classification performance for cognitive severity was observed in the A-T- group.ConclusionsMRI-based brain volumetry can effectively classify cognitive stages and distinguish biological subtypes in AD. It is a promising tool for clinical staging and predicting impairment severity, especially when used alongside phosphorylated tau.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14929,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Alzheimer's Disease\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"13872877251339840\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Alzheimer's Disease\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/13872877251339840\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"NEUROSCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Alzheimer's Disease","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/13872877251339840","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
淀粉样蛋白、tau蛋白、神经退行性变(ATN)框架使用磁共振成像(MRI)、脑脊液(CSF)或正电子发射断层扫描(PET)生物标志物提供了阿尔茨海默病(AD)的生物学分期模型。核磁共振成像是非侵入性的、可获得的、成本低廉的,有望成为一种生物标志物。目的评估基于mri的自动脑容量测定在区分认知障碍严重程度(认知未受损(CU)、轻度认知障碍(MCI)和痴呆)以及ATN谱方面的应用价值。方法我们分析了来自阿尔茨海默病神经影像学倡议的394名受试者。首先,我们评估了MRI容积法对认知阶段的分层效果。接下来,我们测试了它区分A + T + N+和A-T-N-个体的能力,同时对临床分期进行分类。最后,我们评估了其对A + T+和A-T-亚组认知严重程度的预测能力,而不考虑神经变性(N),以检验容量测定在AT剖面上的附加价值。结果smri体积法在识别CU、MCI和痴呆方面表现出与已建立的生物标志物相当的性能,并且在与磷酸化tau结合时具有互补价值。海马和颞叶灰质体积区分A + T + N+和A-T-N类的准确率分别为0.81和0.78。在A + T+与A-T比较中,在A-T组观察到最高的认知严重程度分类表现。结论基于smri的脑容量测定能有效区分AD的认知分期和生物学亚型。它是一种很有前途的临床分期和预测损伤严重程度的工具,特别是当与磷酸化的tau一起使用时。
The complementary role of automated brain volumetry to stratify ADNI participants within the ATN framework.
BackgroundThe amyloid, tau, neurodegeneration (ATN) framework provides a biological staging model of Alzheimer's disease (AD) using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), or positron emission tomography (PET) biomarkers. MRI, being non-invasive, accessible, and cost-effective, holds promise as a biomarker.ObjectiveTo evaluate the utility of MRI-based automated brain volumetry in classifying cognitive impairment severity-cognitively unimpaired (CU), mild cognitive impairment (MCI), and dementia-as well as ATN profiles, independently.MethodsWe analyzed 394 subjects from the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative. First, we assessed how well MRI volumetry stratifies cognitive stages. Next, we tested its ability to distinguish A + T + N+ from A-T-N- individuals while classifying clinical stages. Finally, we evaluated its predictive power for cognitive severity in A + T+ and A-T- subgroups, irrespective of neurodegeneration (N), to examine the added value of volumetry across AT profiles.ResultsMRI volumetry showed comparable performance to established biomarkers in identifying CU, MCI, and dementia, and offered complementary value when combined with phosphorylated tau. Hippocampal and temporal gray matter volumes distinguished A + T + N+ from A-T-N- classes with accuracies of 0.81 and 0.78, respectively. In A + T+ versus A-T- comparisons, the highest classification performance for cognitive severity was observed in the A-T- group.ConclusionsMRI-based brain volumetry can effectively classify cognitive stages and distinguish biological subtypes in AD. It is a promising tool for clinical staging and predicting impairment severity, especially when used alongside phosphorylated tau.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Alzheimer''s Disease (JAD) is an international multidisciplinary journal to facilitate progress in understanding the etiology, pathogenesis, epidemiology, genetics, behavior, treatment and psychology of Alzheimer''s disease. The journal publishes research reports, reviews, short communications, hypotheses, ethics reviews, book reviews, and letters-to-the-editor. The journal is dedicated to providing an open forum for original research that will expedite our fundamental understanding of Alzheimer''s disease.