Ashleigh Bull, Colette Galet, Samuel W Jones, Alexander Kurjatko
{"title":"稀释并不总是解决办法:吸入性损伤肺灌洗的回顾性研究。","authors":"Ashleigh Bull, Colette Galet, Samuel W Jones, Alexander Kurjatko","doi":"10.1093/jbcr/iraf078","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Burned patients with inhalation injury commonly undergo bronchoscopy, at times with pulmonary lavage (PL). We characterized the outcomes of burned patients with inhalation injury who underwent PL at a single burn center in a retrospective cohort study. We included all adult patients admitted between July 1, 2015 to June 30, 2023 who were on the ventilator and diagnosed with inhalation injury. Chemical inhalation, grade 0 inhalation injury, and diagnosis of inhalation injury without bronchoscopy were excluded. Demographics, burn size and anatomic location, and hospital course information were collected. Chi-square and Fisher exact tests were used to compare categorical variables, and continuous variables were compared using the Mann-Whitney U test. Multivariate analyses were performed to identify variables associated with outcomes. P < 0.05 was considered significant. One hundred sixteen patients were included; 37 (31.9%) underwent PL. Univariate analysis showed no significant differences in age, total body surface area burned (TBSA) 2nd or 3rd degree TBSA, complication rates, or in-hospital mortality between the no-PL and PL groups. Patients in the PL group had increased ventilator days (6 [2.5-15.5] vs. 2 [1-6], p < 0.001) and hospital length of stay (LOS) (12 [4-37.5] vs. 5 [2-18], p = 0.003). Multivariate analysis showed that PL was associated with an increase in ventilator days (OR = 1.84 [1.14-2.98], p = 0.013), hospital LOS (OR = 1.717 [1.080-2.730], p = 0.022), and sepsis (OR = 7.216 [1.106-47.080], p = 0.039). In conclusion, PL was associated with longer ventilator days, longer LOS, and increased risk of sepsis.</p>","PeriodicalId":15205,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Burn Care & Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Dilution is not always the solution: A retrospective study of pulmonary lavage in inhalation injury.\",\"authors\":\"Ashleigh Bull, Colette Galet, Samuel W Jones, Alexander Kurjatko\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/jbcr/iraf078\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Burned patients with inhalation injury commonly undergo bronchoscopy, at times with pulmonary lavage (PL). We characterized the outcomes of burned patients with inhalation injury who underwent PL at a single burn center in a retrospective cohort study. We included all adult patients admitted between July 1, 2015 to June 30, 2023 who were on the ventilator and diagnosed with inhalation injury. Chemical inhalation, grade 0 inhalation injury, and diagnosis of inhalation injury without bronchoscopy were excluded. Demographics, burn size and anatomic location, and hospital course information were collected. Chi-square and Fisher exact tests were used to compare categorical variables, and continuous variables were compared using the Mann-Whitney U test. Multivariate analyses were performed to identify variables associated with outcomes. P < 0.05 was considered significant. One hundred sixteen patients were included; 37 (31.9%) underwent PL. Univariate analysis showed no significant differences in age, total body surface area burned (TBSA) 2nd or 3rd degree TBSA, complication rates, or in-hospital mortality between the no-PL and PL groups. Patients in the PL group had increased ventilator days (6 [2.5-15.5] vs. 2 [1-6], p < 0.001) and hospital length of stay (LOS) (12 [4-37.5] vs. 5 [2-18], p = 0.003). Multivariate analysis showed that PL was associated with an increase in ventilator days (OR = 1.84 [1.14-2.98], p = 0.013), hospital LOS (OR = 1.717 [1.080-2.730], p = 0.022), and sepsis (OR = 7.216 [1.106-47.080], p = 0.039). In conclusion, PL was associated with longer ventilator days, longer LOS, and increased risk of sepsis.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15205,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Burn Care & Research\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Burn Care & Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/jbcr/iraf078\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Burn Care & Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jbcr/iraf078","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
烧伤合并吸入性损伤的患者通常进行支气管镜检查,有时进行肺灌洗(PL)。在一项回顾性队列研究中,我们描述了在单一烧伤中心接受吸入性损伤的烧伤患者的预后。我们纳入了2015年7月1日至2023年6月30日期间入院的所有使用呼吸机并诊断为吸入性损伤的成年患者。排除化学吸入、0级吸入性损伤和未经支气管镜检查诊断的吸入性损伤。收集患者的人口统计、烧伤大小、解剖位置和住院过程信息。分类变量的比较采用卡方检验和Fisher精确检验,连续变量的比较采用Mann-Whitney U检验。进行多变量分析以确定与结果相关的变量。P < 0.05被认为是显著的。纳入116例患者;37例(31.9%)接受了烧伤。单因素分析显示,无烧伤组和有烧伤组在年龄、烧伤总面积(TBSA)、2度或3度TBSA、并发症发生率或住院死亡率方面无显著差异。PL组患者呼吸机天数增加(6[2.5-15.5]比2 [1-6],p < 0.001),住院时间(LOS)增加(12[4-37.5]比5 [2-18],p = 0.003)。多因素分析显示,PL与呼吸机天数增加(OR = 1.84 [1.14-2.98], p = 0.013)、医院LOS (OR = 1.717 [1.080-2.730], p = 0.022)、脓毒症(OR = 7.216 [1.106-47.080], p = 0.039)相关。总之,PL与较长的呼吸机天数、较长的LOS和脓毒症风险增加有关。
Dilution is not always the solution: A retrospective study of pulmonary lavage in inhalation injury.
Burned patients with inhalation injury commonly undergo bronchoscopy, at times with pulmonary lavage (PL). We characterized the outcomes of burned patients with inhalation injury who underwent PL at a single burn center in a retrospective cohort study. We included all adult patients admitted between July 1, 2015 to June 30, 2023 who were on the ventilator and diagnosed with inhalation injury. Chemical inhalation, grade 0 inhalation injury, and diagnosis of inhalation injury without bronchoscopy were excluded. Demographics, burn size and anatomic location, and hospital course information were collected. Chi-square and Fisher exact tests were used to compare categorical variables, and continuous variables were compared using the Mann-Whitney U test. Multivariate analyses were performed to identify variables associated with outcomes. P < 0.05 was considered significant. One hundred sixteen patients were included; 37 (31.9%) underwent PL. Univariate analysis showed no significant differences in age, total body surface area burned (TBSA) 2nd or 3rd degree TBSA, complication rates, or in-hospital mortality between the no-PL and PL groups. Patients in the PL group had increased ventilator days (6 [2.5-15.5] vs. 2 [1-6], p < 0.001) and hospital length of stay (LOS) (12 [4-37.5] vs. 5 [2-18], p = 0.003). Multivariate analysis showed that PL was associated with an increase in ventilator days (OR = 1.84 [1.14-2.98], p = 0.013), hospital LOS (OR = 1.717 [1.080-2.730], p = 0.022), and sepsis (OR = 7.216 [1.106-47.080], p = 0.039). In conclusion, PL was associated with longer ventilator days, longer LOS, and increased risk of sepsis.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Burn Care & Research provides the latest information on advances in burn prevention, research, education, delivery of acute care, and research to all members of the burn care team. As the official publication of the American Burn Association, this is the only U.S. journal devoted exclusively to the treatment and research of patients with burns. Original, peer-reviewed articles present the latest information on surgical procedures, acute care, reconstruction, burn prevention, and research and education. Other topics include physical therapy/occupational therapy, nutrition, current events in the evolving healthcare debate, and reports on the newest computer software for diagnostics and treatment. The Journal serves all burn care specialists, from physicians, nurses, and physical and occupational therapists to psychologists, counselors, and researchers.