一种新型一步刀与传统刀在结肠内镜下粘膜下剥离中的疗效比较:一项前瞻性多中心随机对照试验。

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Hong Jun Park, Su Young Kim, Gwang Ho Baik, Myeongsook Seo, Hyun Il Seo, Sung Chul Park, Hyunil Kim, Hyun-Soo Kim
{"title":"一种新型一步刀与传统刀在结肠内镜下粘膜下剥离中的疗效比较:一项前瞻性多中心随机对照试验。","authors":"Hong Jun Park, Su Young Kim, Gwang Ho Baik, Myeongsook Seo, Hyun Il Seo, Sung Chul Park, Hyunil Kim, Hyun-Soo Kim","doi":"10.1007/s00384-025-04910-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>For the treatment of advanced colorectal neoplasms, colon endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is a crucial technique, although it is time-consuming. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of a recently developed one-step knife (OSK) in colon ESD and compare its performance with that of a conventional knife (CK).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Between July 2020 and November 2021, patients scheduled to undergo colorectal ESD were randomly assigned to either the OSK group or the CK group. The primary outcome was the total submucosal injection time. Additionally, total procedure time, treatment outcomes, adverse events, and operator convenience were analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Data from 53 patients (28 in the OSK group and 25 in the CK group) were analyzed. The mean total injection time was lower in the OSK group than in the CK group (186 s [IQR, 116.8-249.5] vs. 265 s [IQR, 130.5-553.0]), but the difference was not statistically significant (P = 0.082). The total procedure time tended to be shorter in the OSK group than in the CK group (15.5 min [IQR, 11.3-22.8] vs. 20 min [IQR, 13.5-42.5], P = 0.110). Resection rates and adverse events did not differ between the two groups. A greater proportion of endoscopists expressed high satisfaction with the OSK, particularly regarding submucosal injection.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Compared to the CK, OSK use led to shorter injection and procedure times, though not statistically significant. The use of this newly developed endoscopic knife can potentially enhance the effectiveness and efficiency of colorectal ESD (Clinical Research Information Service: KCT0005123).</p>","PeriodicalId":13789,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Colorectal Disease","volume":"40 1","pages":"116"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12078380/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficacy of a novel one-step knife compared to conventional knife for colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection: a prospective multicenter randomized controlled trial.\",\"authors\":\"Hong Jun Park, Su Young Kim, Gwang Ho Baik, Myeongsook Seo, Hyun Il Seo, Sung Chul Park, Hyunil Kim, Hyun-Soo Kim\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00384-025-04910-0\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>For the treatment of advanced colorectal neoplasms, colon endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is a crucial technique, although it is time-consuming. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of a recently developed one-step knife (OSK) in colon ESD and compare its performance with that of a conventional knife (CK).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Between July 2020 and November 2021, patients scheduled to undergo colorectal ESD were randomly assigned to either the OSK group or the CK group. The primary outcome was the total submucosal injection time. Additionally, total procedure time, treatment outcomes, adverse events, and operator convenience were analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Data from 53 patients (28 in the OSK group and 25 in the CK group) were analyzed. The mean total injection time was lower in the OSK group than in the CK group (186 s [IQR, 116.8-249.5] vs. 265 s [IQR, 130.5-553.0]), but the difference was not statistically significant (P = 0.082). The total procedure time tended to be shorter in the OSK group than in the CK group (15.5 min [IQR, 11.3-22.8] vs. 20 min [IQR, 13.5-42.5], P = 0.110). Resection rates and adverse events did not differ between the two groups. A greater proportion of endoscopists expressed high satisfaction with the OSK, particularly regarding submucosal injection.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Compared to the CK, OSK use led to shorter injection and procedure times, though not statistically significant. The use of this newly developed endoscopic knife can potentially enhance the effectiveness and efficiency of colorectal ESD (Clinical Research Information Service: KCT0005123).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13789,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Colorectal Disease\",\"volume\":\"40 1\",\"pages\":\"116\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12078380/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Colorectal Disease\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-025-04910-0\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Colorectal Disease","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-025-04910-0","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:结肠内镜下粘膜下剥离术(ESD)是治疗晚期结直肠肿瘤的一项关键技术,但耗时较长。本研究的目的是评估最近开发的一步刀(OSK)在结肠ESD中的疗效,并将其与传统刀(CK)的性能进行比较。方法:在2020年7月至2021年11月期间,计划接受结肠直肠ESD的患者随机分为OSK组和CK组。主要观察指标为总粘膜下注射时间。此外,还分析了总手术时间、治疗结果、不良事件和操作人员便利性。结果:对53例患者(OSK组28例,CK组25例)的资料进行分析。OSK组平均总注射时间低于CK组(186 s [IQR, 116.8 ~ 249.5]比265 s [IQR, 130.5 ~ 553.0]),但差异无统计学意义(P = 0.082)。总手术时间OSK组明显短于CK组(15.5 min [IQR, 11.3-22.8] vs. 20 min [IQR, 13.5-42.5], P = 0.110)。两组间的切除率和不良事件没有差异。更大比例的内窥镜医师对OSK表示高度满意,特别是关于粘膜下注射。结论:与CK相比,使用OSK可缩短注射时间和手术时间,但无统计学意义。使用这种新开发的内镜刀可以潜在地提高结肠直肠ESD的有效性和效率(临床研究信息服务:KCT0005123)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Efficacy of a novel one-step knife compared to conventional knife for colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection: a prospective multicenter randomized controlled trial.

Efficacy of a novel one-step knife compared to conventional knife for colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection: a prospective multicenter randomized controlled trial.

Efficacy of a novel one-step knife compared to conventional knife for colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection: a prospective multicenter randomized controlled trial.

Efficacy of a novel one-step knife compared to conventional knife for colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection: a prospective multicenter randomized controlled trial.

Purpose: For the treatment of advanced colorectal neoplasms, colon endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is a crucial technique, although it is time-consuming. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of a recently developed one-step knife (OSK) in colon ESD and compare its performance with that of a conventional knife (CK).

Methods: Between July 2020 and November 2021, patients scheduled to undergo colorectal ESD were randomly assigned to either the OSK group or the CK group. The primary outcome was the total submucosal injection time. Additionally, total procedure time, treatment outcomes, adverse events, and operator convenience were analyzed.

Results: Data from 53 patients (28 in the OSK group and 25 in the CK group) were analyzed. The mean total injection time was lower in the OSK group than in the CK group (186 s [IQR, 116.8-249.5] vs. 265 s [IQR, 130.5-553.0]), but the difference was not statistically significant (P = 0.082). The total procedure time tended to be shorter in the OSK group than in the CK group (15.5 min [IQR, 11.3-22.8] vs. 20 min [IQR, 13.5-42.5], P = 0.110). Resection rates and adverse events did not differ between the two groups. A greater proportion of endoscopists expressed high satisfaction with the OSK, particularly regarding submucosal injection.

Conclusion: Compared to the CK, OSK use led to shorter injection and procedure times, though not statistically significant. The use of this newly developed endoscopic knife can potentially enhance the effectiveness and efficiency of colorectal ESD (Clinical Research Information Service: KCT0005123).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
3.60%
发文量
206
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Colorectal Disease, Clinical and Molecular Gastroenterology and Surgery aims to publish novel and state-of-the-art papers which deal with the physiology and pathophysiology of diseases involving the entire gastrointestinal tract. In addition to original research articles, the following categories will be included: reviews (usually commissioned but may also be submitted), case reports, letters to the editor, and protocols on clinical studies. The journal offers its readers an interdisciplinary forum for clinical science and molecular research related to gastrointestinal disease.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信