PCV20与PCV10在小儿3 + 1和2 + 1方案中免疫原性的间接比较

IF 4.7 3区 医学 Q1 INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Infectious Diseases and Therapy Pub Date : 2025-05-01 Epub Date: 2025-04-14 DOI:10.1007/s40121-025-01151-0
Eileen M Dunne, Valda A Struwig, Wing Lowe, Claire H Wilson, Johnna E Perdrizet, Noor Tamimi, Kyla Hayford, Luis Jodar, Bradford D Gessner, Christian Theilacker
{"title":"PCV20与PCV10在小儿3 + 1和2 + 1方案中免疫原性的间接比较","authors":"Eileen M Dunne, Valda A Struwig, Wing Lowe, Claire H Wilson, Johnna E Perdrizet, Noor Tamimi, Kyla Hayford, Luis Jodar, Bradford D Gessner, Christian Theilacker","doi":"10.1007/s40121-025-01151-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The 20-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV20) was licensed for prevention of pneumococcal disease in infants and children on the basis of immunogenicity compared with PCV13. We aimed to evaluate PCV20 immunogenicity compared with PCV10 (Synflorix; PhiD-CV) because both vaccines demonstrated lower immunogenicity than PCV13. Nevertheless, PCV10 was highly effective against vaccine-serotype pneumococcal disease in post-licensure studies. Since no study has directly compared PCV20 versus PCV10, we conducted an indirect comparison.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted indirect comparisons for PCV20 versus PCV10 using data from published randomized control trials that directly compared these vaccines with PCV13 in 3 + 1 or 2 + 1 schedules. Serotype-specific immunoglobulin (Ig)G concentrations and opsonophagocytic activity (OPA) were assessed post-booster dose and post-primary series. First, geometric mean ratios (GMRs) were obtained for shared serotypes for each direct comparison against PCV13; we conducted a meta-analysis to generate pooled GMRs if data from multiple trials were available. Next, we indirectly compared relative GMRs of PCV20 versus PCV10 using PCV13 as the common comparator. In this descriptive analysis, GMRs > 1 favored PCV20 and GMR < 1 favored PCV10.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Meta-analyses of PCV10 versus PCV13 data found that PCV10 was less immunogenic for most of the ten shared serotypes. When indirectly compared via PCV13, the relative immunogenicity of PCV20 versus PCV10 varied by serotype. Overall, IgG responses for the ten shared serotypes were similar for both 3 + 1 and 2 + 1 schedules, both post-primary series and post-booster dose. GMRs for both IgG and OPA were close to the line of equivalence, or spread between favoring PCV20 or PCV10.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The comparable immunogenicity of PCV20 versus PCV10 in 2 + 1 and 3 + 1 schedules suggests that PCV20 will have similar effectiveness for the ten serotypes included in both vaccines, including for direct protection during infancy and toddler age, while also expanding serotype coverage. Effectiveness for PCV20 needs to be confirmed in post-marketing studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":13592,"journal":{"name":"Infectious Diseases and Therapy","volume":" ","pages":"1103-1117"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12084450/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Indirect Comparison of PCV20 Immunogenicity with PCV10 in Pediatric 3 + 1 and 2 + 1 Schedules.\",\"authors\":\"Eileen M Dunne, Valda A Struwig, Wing Lowe, Claire H Wilson, Johnna E Perdrizet, Noor Tamimi, Kyla Hayford, Luis Jodar, Bradford D Gessner, Christian Theilacker\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s40121-025-01151-0\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The 20-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV20) was licensed for prevention of pneumococcal disease in infants and children on the basis of immunogenicity compared with PCV13. We aimed to evaluate PCV20 immunogenicity compared with PCV10 (Synflorix; PhiD-CV) because both vaccines demonstrated lower immunogenicity than PCV13. Nevertheless, PCV10 was highly effective against vaccine-serotype pneumococcal disease in post-licensure studies. Since no study has directly compared PCV20 versus PCV10, we conducted an indirect comparison.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted indirect comparisons for PCV20 versus PCV10 using data from published randomized control trials that directly compared these vaccines with PCV13 in 3 + 1 or 2 + 1 schedules. Serotype-specific immunoglobulin (Ig)G concentrations and opsonophagocytic activity (OPA) were assessed post-booster dose and post-primary series. First, geometric mean ratios (GMRs) were obtained for shared serotypes for each direct comparison against PCV13; we conducted a meta-analysis to generate pooled GMRs if data from multiple trials were available. Next, we indirectly compared relative GMRs of PCV20 versus PCV10 using PCV13 as the common comparator. In this descriptive analysis, GMRs > 1 favored PCV20 and GMR < 1 favored PCV10.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Meta-analyses of PCV10 versus PCV13 data found that PCV10 was less immunogenic for most of the ten shared serotypes. When indirectly compared via PCV13, the relative immunogenicity of PCV20 versus PCV10 varied by serotype. Overall, IgG responses for the ten shared serotypes were similar for both 3 + 1 and 2 + 1 schedules, both post-primary series and post-booster dose. GMRs for both IgG and OPA were close to the line of equivalence, or spread between favoring PCV20 or PCV10.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The comparable immunogenicity of PCV20 versus PCV10 in 2 + 1 and 3 + 1 schedules suggests that PCV20 will have similar effectiveness for the ten serotypes included in both vaccines, including for direct protection during infancy and toddler age, while also expanding serotype coverage. Effectiveness for PCV20 needs to be confirmed in post-marketing studies.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13592,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Infectious Diseases and Therapy\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1103-1117\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12084450/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Infectious Diseases and Therapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40121-025-01151-0\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/4/14 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"INFECTIOUS DISEASES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Infectious Diseases and Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40121-025-01151-0","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

与PCV13相比,基于免疫原性,20价肺炎球菌结合疫苗(PCV20)被批准用于预防婴儿和儿童肺炎球菌疾病。我们的目的是评估PCV20与PCV10 (Synflorix;因为这两种疫苗的免疫原性都低于PCV13。然而,在许可后的研究中,PCV10对疫苗血清型肺炎球菌疾病非常有效。由于没有研究直接比较PCV20和PCV10,我们进行了间接比较。方法:我们使用已发表的随机对照试验的数据对PCV20和PCV10进行了间接比较,这些试验直接将这些疫苗与PCV13按3 + 1或2 + 1时间表进行了比较。血清型特异性免疫球蛋白(Ig)G浓度和调理噬细胞活性(OPA)在增强剂量和初级系列后进行评估。首先,对每个与PCV13直接比较的共享血清型获得几何平均比率(GMRs);如果有多个试验的数据,我们进行了荟萃分析,以产生汇总的gmr。接下来,我们使用PCV13作为通用比较器,间接比较PCV20与PCV10的相对gmr。在这一描述性分析中,GMR bbbb1倾向于PCV20和GMR结果:PCV10与PCV13数据的荟萃分析发现,PCV10对10种共享血清型中的大多数具有较低的免疫原性。当通过PCV13间接比较时,PCV20与PCV10的相对免疫原性因血清型而异。总体而言,在3 + 1和2 + 1方案中,无论是初级系列还是加强剂量后,10种共享血清型的IgG反应相似。IgG和OPA的gmr均接近等值线,或在PCV20和PCV10之间存在差异。结论:PCV20与PCV10在2 + 1和3 + 1接种计划中的免疫原性相当,这表明PCV20对两种疫苗中包含的10种血清型具有相似的有效性,包括在婴儿期和学步期的直接保护,同时也扩大了血清型的覆盖范围。PCV20的有效性需要在上市后研究中确认。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Indirect Comparison of PCV20 Immunogenicity with PCV10 in Pediatric 3 + 1 and 2 + 1 Schedules.

Introduction: The 20-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV20) was licensed for prevention of pneumococcal disease in infants and children on the basis of immunogenicity compared with PCV13. We aimed to evaluate PCV20 immunogenicity compared with PCV10 (Synflorix; PhiD-CV) because both vaccines demonstrated lower immunogenicity than PCV13. Nevertheless, PCV10 was highly effective against vaccine-serotype pneumococcal disease in post-licensure studies. Since no study has directly compared PCV20 versus PCV10, we conducted an indirect comparison.

Methods: We conducted indirect comparisons for PCV20 versus PCV10 using data from published randomized control trials that directly compared these vaccines with PCV13 in 3 + 1 or 2 + 1 schedules. Serotype-specific immunoglobulin (Ig)G concentrations and opsonophagocytic activity (OPA) were assessed post-booster dose and post-primary series. First, geometric mean ratios (GMRs) were obtained for shared serotypes for each direct comparison against PCV13; we conducted a meta-analysis to generate pooled GMRs if data from multiple trials were available. Next, we indirectly compared relative GMRs of PCV20 versus PCV10 using PCV13 as the common comparator. In this descriptive analysis, GMRs > 1 favored PCV20 and GMR < 1 favored PCV10.

Results: Meta-analyses of PCV10 versus PCV13 data found that PCV10 was less immunogenic for most of the ten shared serotypes. When indirectly compared via PCV13, the relative immunogenicity of PCV20 versus PCV10 varied by serotype. Overall, IgG responses for the ten shared serotypes were similar for both 3 + 1 and 2 + 1 schedules, both post-primary series and post-booster dose. GMRs for both IgG and OPA were close to the line of equivalence, or spread between favoring PCV20 or PCV10.

Conclusions: The comparable immunogenicity of PCV20 versus PCV10 in 2 + 1 and 3 + 1 schedules suggests that PCV20 will have similar effectiveness for the ten serotypes included in both vaccines, including for direct protection during infancy and toddler age, while also expanding serotype coverage. Effectiveness for PCV20 needs to be confirmed in post-marketing studies.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Infectious Diseases and Therapy
Infectious Diseases and Therapy Medicine-Microbiology (medical)
CiteScore
8.60
自引率
1.90%
发文量
136
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊介绍: Infectious Diseases and Therapy is an international, open access, peer-reviewed, rapid publication journal dedicated to the publication of high-quality clinical (all phases), observational, real-world, and health outcomes research around the discovery, development, and use of infectious disease therapies and interventions, including vaccines and devices. Studies relating to diagnostic products and diagnosis, pharmacoeconomics, public health, epidemiology, quality of life, and patient care, management, and education are also encouraged. Areas of focus include, but are not limited to, bacterial and fungal infections, viral infections (including HIV/AIDS and hepatitis), parasitological diseases, tuberculosis and other mycobacterial diseases, vaccinations and other interventions, and drug-resistance, chronic infections, epidemiology and tropical, emergent, pediatric, dermal and sexually-transmitted diseases.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信