{"title":"不同压力对柔性内窥镜干燥时间的影响。","authors":"W.Q. Hu, J.Y. Li, C.Y. Zhou, Y.X. Ge, Q. Gu","doi":"10.1016/j.jhin.2025.04.007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>The complex structure of endoscopes causes non-uniform drying conditions. However, current clinical drying practices lack precise guidance, leading to the insufficient drying of some endoscopes, which increases the risk of infection. The pressure of compressed air has been shown to influence the effectiveness of endoscope drying; however, specific requirements are absent.</div></div><div><h3>Aim</h3><div>To determine the time required for the sufficient drying of different endoscopes under various pressure conditions.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Six different types of commonly used Olympus flexible endoscopes were selected, and for each type, multiple drying time groups were set under pressures of 0.102 and 0.204 MPa, with 10 endoscopes observed in each group.</div></div><div><h3>Findings</h3><div>Drying times varied according to the type and pressure. At 0.102 MPa, the instrument channel drying ranged from 80 s to 160 s (average: 123 s), while suction channel ranged from 260 s to 540 s (average: 428 s). At 0.204 MPa, the instrument channel dried in 50 s–90 s (average: 72 s), and suction channel in 130 s–230 s (average: 186 s).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Optimal drying times for endoscopes differ according to the type and pressure. A higher pressure (0.204 MPa) efficiently removes moisture and speeds up drying. Longer endoscopes with the same biopsy channel diameter require longer drying time. In addition, the instrument channel dries faster than the suction channel.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54806,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hospital Infection","volume":"161 ","pages":"Pages 37-43"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of different pressures on the drying time of flexible endoscopes\",\"authors\":\"W.Q. Hu, J.Y. Li, C.Y. Zhou, Y.X. Ge, Q. Gu\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jhin.2025.04.007\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>The complex structure of endoscopes causes non-uniform drying conditions. However, current clinical drying practices lack precise guidance, leading to the insufficient drying of some endoscopes, which increases the risk of infection. The pressure of compressed air has been shown to influence the effectiveness of endoscope drying; however, specific requirements are absent.</div></div><div><h3>Aim</h3><div>To determine the time required for the sufficient drying of different endoscopes under various pressure conditions.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Six different types of commonly used Olympus flexible endoscopes were selected, and for each type, multiple drying time groups were set under pressures of 0.102 and 0.204 MPa, with 10 endoscopes observed in each group.</div></div><div><h3>Findings</h3><div>Drying times varied according to the type and pressure. At 0.102 MPa, the instrument channel drying ranged from 80 s to 160 s (average: 123 s), while suction channel ranged from 260 s to 540 s (average: 428 s). At 0.204 MPa, the instrument channel dried in 50 s–90 s (average: 72 s), and suction channel in 130 s–230 s (average: 186 s).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Optimal drying times for endoscopes differ according to the type and pressure. A higher pressure (0.204 MPa) efficiently removes moisture and speeds up drying. Longer endoscopes with the same biopsy channel diameter require longer drying time. In addition, the instrument channel dries faster than the suction channel.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54806,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Hospital Infection\",\"volume\":\"161 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 37-43\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Hospital Infection\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0195670125000970\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"INFECTIOUS DISEASES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Hospital Infection","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0195670125000970","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Impact of different pressures on the drying time of flexible endoscopes
Background
The complex structure of endoscopes causes non-uniform drying conditions. However, current clinical drying practices lack precise guidance, leading to the insufficient drying of some endoscopes, which increases the risk of infection. The pressure of compressed air has been shown to influence the effectiveness of endoscope drying; however, specific requirements are absent.
Aim
To determine the time required for the sufficient drying of different endoscopes under various pressure conditions.
Methods
Six different types of commonly used Olympus flexible endoscopes were selected, and for each type, multiple drying time groups were set under pressures of 0.102 and 0.204 MPa, with 10 endoscopes observed in each group.
Findings
Drying times varied according to the type and pressure. At 0.102 MPa, the instrument channel drying ranged from 80 s to 160 s (average: 123 s), while suction channel ranged from 260 s to 540 s (average: 428 s). At 0.204 MPa, the instrument channel dried in 50 s–90 s (average: 72 s), and suction channel in 130 s–230 s (average: 186 s).
Conclusion
Optimal drying times for endoscopes differ according to the type and pressure. A higher pressure (0.204 MPa) efficiently removes moisture and speeds up drying. Longer endoscopes with the same biopsy channel diameter require longer drying time. In addition, the instrument channel dries faster than the suction channel.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Hospital Infection is the editorially independent scientific publication of the Healthcare Infection Society. The aim of the Journal is to publish high quality research and information relating to infection prevention and control that is relevant to an international audience.
The Journal welcomes submissions that relate to all aspects of infection prevention and control in healthcare settings. This includes submissions that:
provide new insight into the epidemiology, surveillance, or prevention and control of healthcare-associated infections and antimicrobial resistance in healthcare settings;
provide new insight into cleaning, disinfection and decontamination;
provide new insight into the design of healthcare premises;
describe novel aspects of outbreaks of infection;
throw light on techniques for effective antimicrobial stewardship;
describe novel techniques (laboratory-based or point of care) for the detection of infection or antimicrobial resistance in the healthcare setting, particularly if these can be used to facilitate infection prevention and control;
improve understanding of the motivations of safe healthcare behaviour, or describe techniques for achieving behavioural and cultural change;
improve understanding of the use of IT systems in infection surveillance and prevention and control.