Matheus Daros Pinto, Cristiano Ughini, João Pedro Nunes, Eduardo Lusa Cadore, Ronei Silveira Pinto
{"title":"未经训练的年轻男性,在一组和三组甲板阻力训练后,胸锁肌和胸肋肌厚度增加相似。","authors":"Matheus Daros Pinto, Cristiano Ughini, João Pedro Nunes, Eduardo Lusa Cadore, Ronei Silveira Pinto","doi":"10.1519/JSC.0000000000005045","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Abstract: </strong>Pinto, MD, Ughini, C, Nunes, JP, Cadore, EL, and Pinto, RS. Pectoralis clavicular and sternocostal thicknesses increase similarly in response to one and three sets of pec deck resistance training in untrained young men. J Strength Cond Res 39(5): 523-530, 2025-Perceived lack of time is a commonly cited reason for not engaging in resistance training (RT). Consequently, there is interest in identifying time-efficient and minimum-effective RT doses. Although RT and rehabilitation programs typically aim for muscle-specific growth, research on the pectoralis major is notably limited despite it being a frequently targeted muscle group. Here we compare the effects of two RT volumes on regional pectoralis major hypertrophy and shoulder horizontal abduction strength using a within-subject design. Following a non-training control period, 15 untrained young men (age: 24.1 ± 3.1 years) participated in a 12-week RT program, comprised of the pec deck exercise, performed in 1 set (1S) vs. 3 sets (3S), in a linear periodization of 20 to 8 repetitions maximum to failure. B-mode ultrasound imaging was used to analyze muscle thicknesses of the pectoralis major clavicular and sternocostal portions, and maximal strength was determined by 1-repetition maximum tests on the pec deck exercise. After 12 weeks of RT, similar increases were observed between conditions for the pectoralis major clavicular (1S = 17%; 3S = 18%) and sternocostal (1S = 21%; 3S = 21%) thicknesses, and maximum strength (1S = 46%; 3S = 43%). Our results indicate no effect of RT volume (1S vs. 3S) on changes in muscle size and strength and do not support regional hypertrophy after pec deck exercise in untrained men. These results have important implications for RT prescription and rehabilitation practices for individuals who may have limited time or those undergoing brief rehabilitation sessions targeting the pectoralis musculature.</p>","PeriodicalId":17129,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research","volume":"39 5","pages":"523-530"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Pectoralis Clavicular and Sternocostal Thicknesses Increase Similarly in Response to One and Three Sets of Pec Deck Resistance Training in Untrained Young Men.\",\"authors\":\"Matheus Daros Pinto, Cristiano Ughini, João Pedro Nunes, Eduardo Lusa Cadore, Ronei Silveira Pinto\",\"doi\":\"10.1519/JSC.0000000000005045\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Abstract: </strong>Pinto, MD, Ughini, C, Nunes, JP, Cadore, EL, and Pinto, RS. Pectoralis clavicular and sternocostal thicknesses increase similarly in response to one and three sets of pec deck resistance training in untrained young men. J Strength Cond Res 39(5): 523-530, 2025-Perceived lack of time is a commonly cited reason for not engaging in resistance training (RT). Consequently, there is interest in identifying time-efficient and minimum-effective RT doses. Although RT and rehabilitation programs typically aim for muscle-specific growth, research on the pectoralis major is notably limited despite it being a frequently targeted muscle group. Here we compare the effects of two RT volumes on regional pectoralis major hypertrophy and shoulder horizontal abduction strength using a within-subject design. Following a non-training control period, 15 untrained young men (age: 24.1 ± 3.1 years) participated in a 12-week RT program, comprised of the pec deck exercise, performed in 1 set (1S) vs. 3 sets (3S), in a linear periodization of 20 to 8 repetitions maximum to failure. B-mode ultrasound imaging was used to analyze muscle thicknesses of the pectoralis major clavicular and sternocostal portions, and maximal strength was determined by 1-repetition maximum tests on the pec deck exercise. After 12 weeks of RT, similar increases were observed between conditions for the pectoralis major clavicular (1S = 17%; 3S = 18%) and sternocostal (1S = 21%; 3S = 21%) thicknesses, and maximum strength (1S = 46%; 3S = 43%). Our results indicate no effect of RT volume (1S vs. 3S) on changes in muscle size and strength and do not support regional hypertrophy after pec deck exercise in untrained men. These results have important implications for RT prescription and rehabilitation practices for individuals who may have limited time or those undergoing brief rehabilitation sessions targeting the pectoralis musculature.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17129,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research\",\"volume\":\"39 5\",\"pages\":\"523-530\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1519/JSC.0000000000005045\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SPORT SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1519/JSC.0000000000005045","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Pectoralis Clavicular and Sternocostal Thicknesses Increase Similarly in Response to One and Three Sets of Pec Deck Resistance Training in Untrained Young Men.
Abstract: Pinto, MD, Ughini, C, Nunes, JP, Cadore, EL, and Pinto, RS. Pectoralis clavicular and sternocostal thicknesses increase similarly in response to one and three sets of pec deck resistance training in untrained young men. J Strength Cond Res 39(5): 523-530, 2025-Perceived lack of time is a commonly cited reason for not engaging in resistance training (RT). Consequently, there is interest in identifying time-efficient and minimum-effective RT doses. Although RT and rehabilitation programs typically aim for muscle-specific growth, research on the pectoralis major is notably limited despite it being a frequently targeted muscle group. Here we compare the effects of two RT volumes on regional pectoralis major hypertrophy and shoulder horizontal abduction strength using a within-subject design. Following a non-training control period, 15 untrained young men (age: 24.1 ± 3.1 years) participated in a 12-week RT program, comprised of the pec deck exercise, performed in 1 set (1S) vs. 3 sets (3S), in a linear periodization of 20 to 8 repetitions maximum to failure. B-mode ultrasound imaging was used to analyze muscle thicknesses of the pectoralis major clavicular and sternocostal portions, and maximal strength was determined by 1-repetition maximum tests on the pec deck exercise. After 12 weeks of RT, similar increases were observed between conditions for the pectoralis major clavicular (1S = 17%; 3S = 18%) and sternocostal (1S = 21%; 3S = 21%) thicknesses, and maximum strength (1S = 46%; 3S = 43%). Our results indicate no effect of RT volume (1S vs. 3S) on changes in muscle size and strength and do not support regional hypertrophy after pec deck exercise in untrained men. These results have important implications for RT prescription and rehabilitation practices for individuals who may have limited time or those undergoing brief rehabilitation sessions targeting the pectoralis musculature.
期刊介绍:
The editorial mission of The Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research (JSCR) is to advance the knowledge about strength and conditioning through research. A unique aspect of this journal is that it includes recommendations for the practical use of research findings. While the journal name identifies strength and conditioning as separate entities, strength is considered a part of conditioning. This journal wishes to promote the publication of peer-reviewed manuscripts which add to our understanding of conditioning and sport through applied exercise science.