{"title":"常见血样类型对代谢筛查的影响。","authors":"Ceylan Bal, Esra Özyurt, Gülsen Yılmaz","doi":"10.1080/00365513.2025.2490936","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Capillary blood is often used for dried blood spot samples in metabolic screening tests. This study's objective is to examine the amino acid and acylcarnitine levels in the commonly used sampling types from the same subjects and compare the findings with capillary whole blood samples as the reference. Thirty adult patipicants' blood samples were collected into four different tubes: citrated tubes, serum separating tubes, heparin tubes, and EDTA tubes, respectively and additionally into the syringe. 50 μL blood from each tube and syringe was absorbed onto filter papers. Additionally, capillary whole blood taken from each person's fingertip was absorbed onto the filter paper. All measurements were performed with flow-injection analysis tandem mass spectrometry. In the pairwise comparison of fingertip group and other groups, almost all results were different from the reference group (<i>p</i> < 0.05), except for glutamine and methionine for amino acid analysis. The difference in acylcarnitine levels is not as obvious as in amino acid levels. If other sampling types are used for metabolic screening instead of capillary whole blood, it may lead to low results, especially in amino acid measurements. Additionally, cut-off values should be interpreted, taking into consideration the sampling type, and laboratories should be informed about the sampling type used.</p>","PeriodicalId":21474,"journal":{"name":"Scandinavian Journal of Clinical & Laboratory Investigation","volume":"85 3","pages":"196-201"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The effect of common blood sampling types on metabolic screening.\",\"authors\":\"Ceylan Bal, Esra Özyurt, Gülsen Yılmaz\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/00365513.2025.2490936\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Capillary blood is often used for dried blood spot samples in metabolic screening tests. This study's objective is to examine the amino acid and acylcarnitine levels in the commonly used sampling types from the same subjects and compare the findings with capillary whole blood samples as the reference. Thirty adult patipicants' blood samples were collected into four different tubes: citrated tubes, serum separating tubes, heparin tubes, and EDTA tubes, respectively and additionally into the syringe. 50 μL blood from each tube and syringe was absorbed onto filter papers. Additionally, capillary whole blood taken from each person's fingertip was absorbed onto the filter paper. All measurements were performed with flow-injection analysis tandem mass spectrometry. In the pairwise comparison of fingertip group and other groups, almost all results were different from the reference group (<i>p</i> < 0.05), except for glutamine and methionine for amino acid analysis. The difference in acylcarnitine levels is not as obvious as in amino acid levels. If other sampling types are used for metabolic screening instead of capillary whole blood, it may lead to low results, especially in amino acid measurements. Additionally, cut-off values should be interpreted, taking into consideration the sampling type, and laboratories should be informed about the sampling type used.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21474,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Scandinavian Journal of Clinical & Laboratory Investigation\",\"volume\":\"85 3\",\"pages\":\"196-201\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Scandinavian Journal of Clinical & Laboratory Investigation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/00365513.2025.2490936\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/4/10 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scandinavian Journal of Clinical & Laboratory Investigation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00365513.2025.2490936","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
The effect of common blood sampling types on metabolic screening.
Capillary blood is often used for dried blood spot samples in metabolic screening tests. This study's objective is to examine the amino acid and acylcarnitine levels in the commonly used sampling types from the same subjects and compare the findings with capillary whole blood samples as the reference. Thirty adult patipicants' blood samples were collected into four different tubes: citrated tubes, serum separating tubes, heparin tubes, and EDTA tubes, respectively and additionally into the syringe. 50 μL blood from each tube and syringe was absorbed onto filter papers. Additionally, capillary whole blood taken from each person's fingertip was absorbed onto the filter paper. All measurements were performed with flow-injection analysis tandem mass spectrometry. In the pairwise comparison of fingertip group and other groups, almost all results were different from the reference group (p < 0.05), except for glutamine and methionine for amino acid analysis. The difference in acylcarnitine levels is not as obvious as in amino acid levels. If other sampling types are used for metabolic screening instead of capillary whole blood, it may lead to low results, especially in amino acid measurements. Additionally, cut-off values should be interpreted, taking into consideration the sampling type, and laboratories should be informed about the sampling type used.
期刊介绍:
The Scandinavian Journal of Clinical and Laboratory Investigation is an international scientific journal covering clinically oriented biochemical and physiological research. Since the launch of the journal in 1949, it has been a forum for international laboratory medicine, closely related to, and edited by, The Scandinavian Society for Clinical Chemistry.
The journal contains peer-reviewed articles, editorials, invited reviews, and short technical notes, as well as several supplements each year. Supplements consist of monographs, and symposium and congress reports covering subjects within clinical chemistry and clinical physiology.