用机器学习增强狼疮抗凝血测试:深度神经网络匹配专家性能而不需要特征选择。

IF 1.8 Q3 MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY
Jeffrey Wang, Rachel Leger, Dong Chen, Jansen Seheult
{"title":"用机器学习增强狼疮抗凝血测试:深度神经网络匹配专家性能而不需要特征选择。","authors":"Jeffrey Wang, Rachel Leger, Dong Chen, Jansen Seheult","doi":"10.1093/jalm/jfaf039","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The lupus anticoagulant (LAC) is an important laboratory criterion in the diagnosis of antiphospholipid antibody syndrome. LAC testing at the Mayo Clinic Special Coagulation Laboratory includes up to 13 tests, which are interpreted by trained physicians to identify the presence of LAC and rule out anticoagulant interferences. This feasibility study explored the use of two deep neural network (DNN) architectures for multilabel classification of LAC profiles as a first step toward automating interpretation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Seven thousand two hundred and two retrospective cases were randomly split (64:16:20) for training, validation, and test, respectively. LAC positivity by dilute Russell's viper venom time (LAC-DRVVT) and activated partial thromboplastin time (LAC-APTT) and the presence of warfarin (WAR) and heparin (HEP) were adjudicated by one expert. DNN architectures included: single-output DNNs using domain-knowledge input feature selection and a single-column multioutput DNN using all 13 inputs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Domain-knowledge-naïve multioutput DNN achieved similar or improved performance for all 4 label prediction tasks compared with domain knowledge optimized DNNs: F1 scores of 0.977 vs 0.968 for LAC-DRVVT, 0.954 vs 0.945 for LAC-APTT, 0.961 vs 0.957 for HEP, and 0.995 vs 0.977 for WAR, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The comparable performance of the 4 domain knowledge optimized DNNs and the multioutput DNN using all 13 input features suggests that the DNN may learn feature importance or mapping to a task without explicit input selection. Given its relative simplicity and versatility, the multioutput DNN is the preferred choice for implementation in a clinical laboratory to standardize LAC diagnosis.</p>","PeriodicalId":46361,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied Laboratory Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Enhancing Lupus Anticoagulant Testing with Machine Learning: Deep Neural Networks Match Expert Performance without the Need for Feature Selection.\",\"authors\":\"Jeffrey Wang, Rachel Leger, Dong Chen, Jansen Seheult\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/jalm/jfaf039\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The lupus anticoagulant (LAC) is an important laboratory criterion in the diagnosis of antiphospholipid antibody syndrome. LAC testing at the Mayo Clinic Special Coagulation Laboratory includes up to 13 tests, which are interpreted by trained physicians to identify the presence of LAC and rule out anticoagulant interferences. This feasibility study explored the use of two deep neural network (DNN) architectures for multilabel classification of LAC profiles as a first step toward automating interpretation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Seven thousand two hundred and two retrospective cases were randomly split (64:16:20) for training, validation, and test, respectively. LAC positivity by dilute Russell's viper venom time (LAC-DRVVT) and activated partial thromboplastin time (LAC-APTT) and the presence of warfarin (WAR) and heparin (HEP) were adjudicated by one expert. DNN architectures included: single-output DNNs using domain-knowledge input feature selection and a single-column multioutput DNN using all 13 inputs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Domain-knowledge-naïve multioutput DNN achieved similar or improved performance for all 4 label prediction tasks compared with domain knowledge optimized DNNs: F1 scores of 0.977 vs 0.968 for LAC-DRVVT, 0.954 vs 0.945 for LAC-APTT, 0.961 vs 0.957 for HEP, and 0.995 vs 0.977 for WAR, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The comparable performance of the 4 domain knowledge optimized DNNs and the multioutput DNN using all 13 input features suggests that the DNN may learn feature importance or mapping to a task without explicit input selection. Given its relative simplicity and versatility, the multioutput DNN is the preferred choice for implementation in a clinical laboratory to standardize LAC diagnosis.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46361,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Applied Laboratory Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Applied Laboratory Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/jalm/jfaf039\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Applied Laboratory Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jalm/jfaf039","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:狼疮抗凝血(LAC)是诊断抗磷脂抗体综合征的重要实验室指标。梅奥诊所特殊凝血实验室的LAC检测包括多达13项测试,由训练有素的医生进行解释,以确定LAC的存在并排除抗凝干扰。这项可行性研究探索了使用两种深度神经网络(DNN)架构进行LAC概况的多标签分类,作为实现自动化解释的第一步。方法:回顾性研究72200例,随机分组(64:16:20),分别进行训练、验证和检验。经稀释罗素毒蛇毒时间(LAC- drvvt)和活化部分凝血活素时间(LAC- aptt)和华法林(WAR)和肝素(HEP)的存在判定LAC阳性。深度神经网络架构包括:使用领域知识输入特征选择的单输出深度神经网络和使用所有13个输入的单列多输出深度神经网络。结果:Domain-knowledge-naïve与领域知识优化的DNN相比,多输出DNN在所有4个标签预测任务上的表现相似或有所改善:LAC-DRVVT的F1得分分别为0.977 vs 0.968, LAC-APTT的F1得分为0.954 vs 0.945, HEP的F1得分为0.961 vs 0.957, WAR的F1得分为0.995 vs 0.977。结论:4个领域知识优化的深度神经网络与使用全部13个输入特征的多输出深度神经网络的性能比较表明,深度神经网络可以在没有明确输入选择的情况下学习特征重要性或映射到任务。鉴于其相对简单和多功能性,多输出深度神经网络是临床实验室实施标准化LAC诊断的首选。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Enhancing Lupus Anticoagulant Testing with Machine Learning: Deep Neural Networks Match Expert Performance without the Need for Feature Selection.

Background: The lupus anticoagulant (LAC) is an important laboratory criterion in the diagnosis of antiphospholipid antibody syndrome. LAC testing at the Mayo Clinic Special Coagulation Laboratory includes up to 13 tests, which are interpreted by trained physicians to identify the presence of LAC and rule out anticoagulant interferences. This feasibility study explored the use of two deep neural network (DNN) architectures for multilabel classification of LAC profiles as a first step toward automating interpretation.

Methods: Seven thousand two hundred and two retrospective cases were randomly split (64:16:20) for training, validation, and test, respectively. LAC positivity by dilute Russell's viper venom time (LAC-DRVVT) and activated partial thromboplastin time (LAC-APTT) and the presence of warfarin (WAR) and heparin (HEP) were adjudicated by one expert. DNN architectures included: single-output DNNs using domain-knowledge input feature selection and a single-column multioutput DNN using all 13 inputs.

Results: Domain-knowledge-naïve multioutput DNN achieved similar or improved performance for all 4 label prediction tasks compared with domain knowledge optimized DNNs: F1 scores of 0.977 vs 0.968 for LAC-DRVVT, 0.954 vs 0.945 for LAC-APTT, 0.961 vs 0.957 for HEP, and 0.995 vs 0.977 for WAR, respectively.

Conclusions: The comparable performance of the 4 domain knowledge optimized DNNs and the multioutput DNN using all 13 input features suggests that the DNN may learn feature importance or mapping to a task without explicit input selection. Given its relative simplicity and versatility, the multioutput DNN is the preferred choice for implementation in a clinical laboratory to standardize LAC diagnosis.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Applied Laboratory Medicine
Journal of Applied Laboratory Medicine MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY-
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
5.00%
发文量
137
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信