非黄体恶性黑色素瘤原位局部复发和安全切除边缘:系统回顾。

IF 5.5 4区 医学 Q1 DERMATOLOGY
Clio Dessinioti, Aggeliki Befon, Alexander J Stratigos
{"title":"非黄体恶性黑色素瘤原位局部复发和安全切除边缘:系统回顾。","authors":"Clio Dessinioti, Aggeliki Befon, Alexander J Stratigos","doi":"10.1111/ddg.15699","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The strength of evidence supporting a 2-step wide local excision (WLE) with 5 mm safety margins for melanoma in situ non-lentigo maligna (non-LM) type, compared with narrower margins, is unclear. This review aims to compare the frequency of local recurrence (LR) with different safety margins, after the complete surgical excision (R0) of non-LM MIS. We performed a systematic literature search in PubMed, Scopus, and the Cochrane Library up to March 17, 2024. The PRISMA checklist was used. Of 3,047 articles retrieved, seven retrospective studies were included, enrolling a total of 1,526 non-LM MIS cases excised with clear safety margins, after WLE (6 studies) or Mohs surgery (1 study). Most non-LM MIS were located on the trunk/extremities (68%-100%). Narrower margins were used in four studies, ranging from no WLE to 4 mm, and there was only one LR. Standard or wider margins were used in the remaining three studies reporting only two LR. The median follow-up ranged from 48 months to 6.6 years. The overall certainty and quality of evidence were very low. These findings of our systematic review highlight that current guidelines recommending the re-excision for non-LM MIS with clear initial margins lack strong evidence in support of this practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":14758,"journal":{"name":"Journal Der Deutschen Dermatologischen Gesellschaft","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Local recurrence of non-lentigo maligna melanoma in situ and safety excision margins: A systematic review.\",\"authors\":\"Clio Dessinioti, Aggeliki Befon, Alexander J Stratigos\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/ddg.15699\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The strength of evidence supporting a 2-step wide local excision (WLE) with 5 mm safety margins for melanoma in situ non-lentigo maligna (non-LM) type, compared with narrower margins, is unclear. This review aims to compare the frequency of local recurrence (LR) with different safety margins, after the complete surgical excision (R0) of non-LM MIS. We performed a systematic literature search in PubMed, Scopus, and the Cochrane Library up to March 17, 2024. The PRISMA checklist was used. Of 3,047 articles retrieved, seven retrospective studies were included, enrolling a total of 1,526 non-LM MIS cases excised with clear safety margins, after WLE (6 studies) or Mohs surgery (1 study). Most non-LM MIS were located on the trunk/extremities (68%-100%). Narrower margins were used in four studies, ranging from no WLE to 4 mm, and there was only one LR. Standard or wider margins were used in the remaining three studies reporting only two LR. The median follow-up ranged from 48 months to 6.6 years. The overall certainty and quality of evidence were very low. These findings of our systematic review highlight that current guidelines recommending the re-excision for non-LM MIS with clear initial margins lack strong evidence in support of this practice.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14758,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal Der Deutschen Dermatologischen Gesellschaft\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal Der Deutschen Dermatologischen Gesellschaft\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/ddg.15699\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"DERMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal Der Deutschen Dermatologischen Gesellschaft","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/ddg.15699","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

与更窄的边缘相比,支持2步宽局部切除(WLE)与5mm安全边缘的非lm型原位黑色素瘤(non-LM)的证据强度尚不清楚。本综述旨在比较非lm MIS完全手术切除(R0)后不同安全范围的局部复发(LR)频率。我们在PubMed、Scopus和Cochrane图书馆进行了系统的文献检索,检索截止到2024年3月17日。使用PRISMA检查表。在检索到的3047篇文章中,纳入了7项回顾性研究,共纳入了1526例非lm MIS病例,在WLE(6项研究)或Mohs手术(1项研究)后切除了明确的安全界限。大多数非lm MIS位于躯干/四肢(68%-100%)。在四项研究中使用了较窄的边缘,范围从无WLE到4 mm,只有一个LR。其余3项研究仅报道2例LR,采用标准或更宽的切缘。中位随访时间为48个月至6.6年。证据的总体确定性和质量都很低。我们系统回顾的这些发现强调,目前的指南建议对初始边缘明确的非lm MIS进行再切除,缺乏强有力的证据支持这种做法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Local recurrence of non-lentigo maligna melanoma in situ and safety excision margins: A systematic review.

The strength of evidence supporting a 2-step wide local excision (WLE) with 5 mm safety margins for melanoma in situ non-lentigo maligna (non-LM) type, compared with narrower margins, is unclear. This review aims to compare the frequency of local recurrence (LR) with different safety margins, after the complete surgical excision (R0) of non-LM MIS. We performed a systematic literature search in PubMed, Scopus, and the Cochrane Library up to March 17, 2024. The PRISMA checklist was used. Of 3,047 articles retrieved, seven retrospective studies were included, enrolling a total of 1,526 non-LM MIS cases excised with clear safety margins, after WLE (6 studies) or Mohs surgery (1 study). Most non-LM MIS were located on the trunk/extremities (68%-100%). Narrower margins were used in four studies, ranging from no WLE to 4 mm, and there was only one LR. Standard or wider margins were used in the remaining three studies reporting only two LR. The median follow-up ranged from 48 months to 6.6 years. The overall certainty and quality of evidence were very low. These findings of our systematic review highlight that current guidelines recommending the re-excision for non-LM MIS with clear initial margins lack strong evidence in support of this practice.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
25.00%
发文量
406
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The JDDG publishes scientific papers from a wide range of disciplines, such as dermatovenereology, allergology, phlebology, dermatosurgery, dermatooncology, and dermatohistopathology. Also in JDDG: information on medical training, continuing education, a calendar of events, book reviews and society announcements. Papers can be submitted in German or English language. In the print version, all articles are published in German. In the online version, all key articles are published in English.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信