Clio Dessinioti, Aggeliki Befon, Alexander J Stratigos
{"title":"非黄体恶性黑色素瘤原位局部复发和安全切除边缘:系统回顾。","authors":"Clio Dessinioti, Aggeliki Befon, Alexander J Stratigos","doi":"10.1111/ddg.15699","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The strength of evidence supporting a 2-step wide local excision (WLE) with 5 mm safety margins for melanoma in situ non-lentigo maligna (non-LM) type, compared with narrower margins, is unclear. This review aims to compare the frequency of local recurrence (LR) with different safety margins, after the complete surgical excision (R0) of non-LM MIS. We performed a systematic literature search in PubMed, Scopus, and the Cochrane Library up to March 17, 2024. The PRISMA checklist was used. Of 3,047 articles retrieved, seven retrospective studies were included, enrolling a total of 1,526 non-LM MIS cases excised with clear safety margins, after WLE (6 studies) or Mohs surgery (1 study). Most non-LM MIS were located on the trunk/extremities (68%-100%). Narrower margins were used in four studies, ranging from no WLE to 4 mm, and there was only one LR. Standard or wider margins were used in the remaining three studies reporting only two LR. The median follow-up ranged from 48 months to 6.6 years. The overall certainty and quality of evidence were very low. These findings of our systematic review highlight that current guidelines recommending the re-excision for non-LM MIS with clear initial margins lack strong evidence in support of this practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":14758,"journal":{"name":"Journal Der Deutschen Dermatologischen Gesellschaft","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Local recurrence of non-lentigo maligna melanoma in situ and safety excision margins: A systematic review.\",\"authors\":\"Clio Dessinioti, Aggeliki Befon, Alexander J Stratigos\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/ddg.15699\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The strength of evidence supporting a 2-step wide local excision (WLE) with 5 mm safety margins for melanoma in situ non-lentigo maligna (non-LM) type, compared with narrower margins, is unclear. This review aims to compare the frequency of local recurrence (LR) with different safety margins, after the complete surgical excision (R0) of non-LM MIS. We performed a systematic literature search in PubMed, Scopus, and the Cochrane Library up to March 17, 2024. The PRISMA checklist was used. Of 3,047 articles retrieved, seven retrospective studies were included, enrolling a total of 1,526 non-LM MIS cases excised with clear safety margins, after WLE (6 studies) or Mohs surgery (1 study). Most non-LM MIS were located on the trunk/extremities (68%-100%). Narrower margins were used in four studies, ranging from no WLE to 4 mm, and there was only one LR. Standard or wider margins were used in the remaining three studies reporting only two LR. The median follow-up ranged from 48 months to 6.6 years. The overall certainty and quality of evidence were very low. These findings of our systematic review highlight that current guidelines recommending the re-excision for non-LM MIS with clear initial margins lack strong evidence in support of this practice.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14758,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal Der Deutschen Dermatologischen Gesellschaft\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal Der Deutschen Dermatologischen Gesellschaft\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/ddg.15699\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"DERMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal Der Deutschen Dermatologischen Gesellschaft","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/ddg.15699","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Local recurrence of non-lentigo maligna melanoma in situ and safety excision margins: A systematic review.
The strength of evidence supporting a 2-step wide local excision (WLE) with 5 mm safety margins for melanoma in situ non-lentigo maligna (non-LM) type, compared with narrower margins, is unclear. This review aims to compare the frequency of local recurrence (LR) with different safety margins, after the complete surgical excision (R0) of non-LM MIS. We performed a systematic literature search in PubMed, Scopus, and the Cochrane Library up to March 17, 2024. The PRISMA checklist was used. Of 3,047 articles retrieved, seven retrospective studies were included, enrolling a total of 1,526 non-LM MIS cases excised with clear safety margins, after WLE (6 studies) or Mohs surgery (1 study). Most non-LM MIS were located on the trunk/extremities (68%-100%). Narrower margins were used in four studies, ranging from no WLE to 4 mm, and there was only one LR. Standard or wider margins were used in the remaining three studies reporting only two LR. The median follow-up ranged from 48 months to 6.6 years. The overall certainty and quality of evidence were very low. These findings of our systematic review highlight that current guidelines recommending the re-excision for non-LM MIS with clear initial margins lack strong evidence in support of this practice.
期刊介绍:
The JDDG publishes scientific papers from a wide range of disciplines, such as dermatovenereology, allergology, phlebology, dermatosurgery, dermatooncology, and dermatohistopathology. Also in JDDG: information on medical training, continuing education, a calendar of events, book reviews and society announcements.
Papers can be submitted in German or English language. In the print version, all articles are published in German. In the online version, all key articles are published in English.