{"title":"论艾伦·阿姆斯特朗的“护理实践的强大美德伦理”。","authors":"Roger Newham","doi":"10.1111/nup.70027","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Armstrong's (2006) 'Towards a strong virtue ethics for nursing practice' is focused on how the practice of nursing necessitates morally good character traits as virtues including the intellectual virtue phronesis. Because of this, he claims, nursing ethics should also be grounded in virtue ethics. Illness creates a unique phenomenon that involves a special therapeutic as helping relationship necessitating good interpersonal skills and patient-centred care that, for the role of a nurse and nursing ethics, requires a focus on persons and relationships, character and emotions. Obligation, act centred normative theories are, according to Armstrong, incomplete and inadequate for nursing practice. They are incomplete and inadequate as moral theories because they ignore, or at least do not give appropriate moral importance to, other factors of life such as character, moral education, emotions and relationships. Armstrong grounds his virtue ethics in a 'moralised' eudaimonia. This leads to problems of getting from good for to good. It is suggested a non eudaimonistic, virtue ethics by Swanton might be just what Armstrong is after but as an account of ethics not morality.</p>","PeriodicalId":49724,"journal":{"name":"Nursing Philosophy","volume":"26 2","pages":"e70027"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12022188/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"On Alan Armstrong's 'Towards a Strong Virtue Ethics for Nursing Practice'.\",\"authors\":\"Roger Newham\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/nup.70027\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Armstrong's (2006) 'Towards a strong virtue ethics for nursing practice' is focused on how the practice of nursing necessitates morally good character traits as virtues including the intellectual virtue phronesis. Because of this, he claims, nursing ethics should also be grounded in virtue ethics. Illness creates a unique phenomenon that involves a special therapeutic as helping relationship necessitating good interpersonal skills and patient-centred care that, for the role of a nurse and nursing ethics, requires a focus on persons and relationships, character and emotions. Obligation, act centred normative theories are, according to Armstrong, incomplete and inadequate for nursing practice. They are incomplete and inadequate as moral theories because they ignore, or at least do not give appropriate moral importance to, other factors of life such as character, moral education, emotions and relationships. Armstrong grounds his virtue ethics in a 'moralised' eudaimonia. This leads to problems of getting from good for to good. It is suggested a non eudaimonistic, virtue ethics by Swanton might be just what Armstrong is after but as an account of ethics not morality.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49724,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nursing Philosophy\",\"volume\":\"26 2\",\"pages\":\"e70027\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12022188/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nursing Philosophy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/nup.70027\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nursing Philosophy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/nup.70027","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
On Alan Armstrong's 'Towards a Strong Virtue Ethics for Nursing Practice'.
Armstrong's (2006) 'Towards a strong virtue ethics for nursing practice' is focused on how the practice of nursing necessitates morally good character traits as virtues including the intellectual virtue phronesis. Because of this, he claims, nursing ethics should also be grounded in virtue ethics. Illness creates a unique phenomenon that involves a special therapeutic as helping relationship necessitating good interpersonal skills and patient-centred care that, for the role of a nurse and nursing ethics, requires a focus on persons and relationships, character and emotions. Obligation, act centred normative theories are, according to Armstrong, incomplete and inadequate for nursing practice. They are incomplete and inadequate as moral theories because they ignore, or at least do not give appropriate moral importance to, other factors of life such as character, moral education, emotions and relationships. Armstrong grounds his virtue ethics in a 'moralised' eudaimonia. This leads to problems of getting from good for to good. It is suggested a non eudaimonistic, virtue ethics by Swanton might be just what Armstrong is after but as an account of ethics not morality.
期刊介绍:
Nursing Philosophy provides a forum for discussion of philosophical issues in nursing. These focus on questions relating to the nature of nursing and to the phenomena of key relevance to it. For example, any understanding of what nursing is presupposes some conception of just what nurses are trying to do when they nurse. But what are the ends of nursing? Are they to promote health, prevent disease, promote well-being, enhance autonomy, relieve suffering, or some combination of these? How are these ends are to be met? What kind of knowledge is needed in order to nurse? Practical, theoretical, aesthetic, moral, political, ''intuitive'' or some other?
Papers that explore other aspects of philosophical enquiry and analysis of relevance to nursing (and any other healthcare or social care activity) are also welcome and might include, but not be limited to, critical discussions of the work of nurse theorists who have advanced philosophical claims (e.g., Benner, Benner and Wrubel, Carper, Schrok, Watson, Parse and so on) as well as critical engagement with philosophers (e.g., Heidegger, Husserl, Kuhn, Polanyi, Taylor, MacIntyre and so on) whose work informs health care in general and nursing in particular.