SynOcta与InOcta组织水平基台螺钉松动的体外比较分析。

Q1 Dentistry
Amirhossein Fathi, Erfan Esmaeilian, Sepideh Salehi, Ramin Mosharraf, Ramin Atash
{"title":"SynOcta与InOcta组织水平基台螺钉松动的体外比较分析。","authors":"Amirhossein Fathi, Erfan Esmaeilian, Sepideh Salehi, Ramin Mosharraf, Ramin Atash","doi":"10.1055/s-0045-1808257","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Implants are one of the common treatments in dentistry. This treatment has various complications such as inflammation around the implant, failure of the coating, and screw loosening. Several factors contribute to screw loosening, including abutment type and collar height. Therefore, this study aims to compare the amount of loosening in two types of abutments-InOcta and SynOcta abutments.In this laboratory study, 20 titanium fixtures of the Dentis brand were divided into two groups. Each group consisted of 10 fixtures. The fixtures were mounted vertically in acrylic blocks with dimensions of 20 × 6 × 10 mm. After installing the SynOcta and InOcta abutments, the screws were torqued to 30 N·cm and re-torqued after 10 minutes. Subsequently, the samples were transferred to a chewing simulator. A compressive force of 90 N was applied for 10,000 cycles at a frequency of 75 rpm. After loading, the torque required to loosen the screws was measured, and the loosening torque was calculated. The data were analyzed using an independent <i>t</i>-test, and a significance level (<i>p</i>-value) of less than 0.05 was considered.The mean de-torque for the tissue level InOcta abutments was calculated to be 25.75 N.cm, while the mean de-torque for the SynOcta abutments was 21.98 N.cm. A comparison using the <i>t</i>-test showed that the mean de-torque for the InOcta abutment group was significantly higher than the SynOcta group (<i>p</i> < 0.001).The final results of the experiments indicate that under laboratory conditions, the de-torque of the abutment screw in the tissue level SynOcta group is significantly lower than that in the InOcta group (<i>p</i> < 0.001).</p>","PeriodicalId":12028,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Dentistry","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative Analysis of Screw Loosening between SynOcta and InOcta Tissue Level Abutments: An In Vitro Study.\",\"authors\":\"Amirhossein Fathi, Erfan Esmaeilian, Sepideh Salehi, Ramin Mosharraf, Ramin Atash\",\"doi\":\"10.1055/s-0045-1808257\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Implants are one of the common treatments in dentistry. This treatment has various complications such as inflammation around the implant, failure of the coating, and screw loosening. Several factors contribute to screw loosening, including abutment type and collar height. Therefore, this study aims to compare the amount of loosening in two types of abutments-InOcta and SynOcta abutments.In this laboratory study, 20 titanium fixtures of the Dentis brand were divided into two groups. Each group consisted of 10 fixtures. The fixtures were mounted vertically in acrylic blocks with dimensions of 20 × 6 × 10 mm. After installing the SynOcta and InOcta abutments, the screws were torqued to 30 N·cm and re-torqued after 10 minutes. Subsequently, the samples were transferred to a chewing simulator. A compressive force of 90 N was applied for 10,000 cycles at a frequency of 75 rpm. After loading, the torque required to loosen the screws was measured, and the loosening torque was calculated. The data were analyzed using an independent <i>t</i>-test, and a significance level (<i>p</i>-value) of less than 0.05 was considered.The mean de-torque for the tissue level InOcta abutments was calculated to be 25.75 N.cm, while the mean de-torque for the SynOcta abutments was 21.98 N.cm. A comparison using the <i>t</i>-test showed that the mean de-torque for the InOcta abutment group was significantly higher than the SynOcta group (<i>p</i> < 0.001).The final results of the experiments indicate that under laboratory conditions, the de-torque of the abutment screw in the tissue level SynOcta group is significantly lower than that in the InOcta group (<i>p</i> < 0.001).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12028,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Dentistry\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Dentistry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0045-1808257\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Dentistry\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0045-1808257","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Dentistry","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

种植体是牙科中常见的治疗方法之一。这种治疗有各种并发症,如种植体周围的炎症,涂层失败和螺钉松动。有几个因素会导致螺丝松动,包括基台类型和接箍高度。因此,本研究的目的是比较两种类型的基台- inocta和synnocta的松动量。在本实验室研究中,我们将牙科品牌的钛金属固定装置20个分为两组。每组10个固定装置。夹具垂直安装在尺寸为20 × 6 × 10毫米的丙烯酸块中。安装SynOcta和InOcta基台后,将螺钉扭矩至30 N·cm, 10分钟后再扭矩。随后,这些样本被转移到咀嚼模拟器中。施加90牛的压缩力,以75转/分的频率进行10,000次循环。加载完成后,测量螺钉松动所需的力矩,并计算松动力矩。资料分析采用独立t检验,以p值< 0.05为显著性水平。计算出组织级InOcta基台的平均去扭矩为25.75 N。SynOcta基台的平均去扭矩为21.98 N.cm。采用t检验比较表明,InOcta基台组的平均去扭矩显著高于SynOcta组(p < 0.05)
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparative Analysis of Screw Loosening between SynOcta and InOcta Tissue Level Abutments: An In Vitro Study.

Implants are one of the common treatments in dentistry. This treatment has various complications such as inflammation around the implant, failure of the coating, and screw loosening. Several factors contribute to screw loosening, including abutment type and collar height. Therefore, this study aims to compare the amount of loosening in two types of abutments-InOcta and SynOcta abutments.In this laboratory study, 20 titanium fixtures of the Dentis brand were divided into two groups. Each group consisted of 10 fixtures. The fixtures were mounted vertically in acrylic blocks with dimensions of 20 × 6 × 10 mm. After installing the SynOcta and InOcta abutments, the screws were torqued to 30 N·cm and re-torqued after 10 minutes. Subsequently, the samples were transferred to a chewing simulator. A compressive force of 90 N was applied for 10,000 cycles at a frequency of 75 rpm. After loading, the torque required to loosen the screws was measured, and the loosening torque was calculated. The data were analyzed using an independent t-test, and a significance level (p-value) of less than 0.05 was considered.The mean de-torque for the tissue level InOcta abutments was calculated to be 25.75 N.cm, while the mean de-torque for the SynOcta abutments was 21.98 N.cm. A comparison using the t-test showed that the mean de-torque for the InOcta abutment group was significantly higher than the SynOcta group (p < 0.001).The final results of the experiments indicate that under laboratory conditions, the de-torque of the abutment screw in the tissue level SynOcta group is significantly lower than that in the InOcta group (p < 0.001).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
European Journal of Dentistry
European Journal of Dentistry Dentistry-Dentistry (all)
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
161
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Dentistry is the official journal of the Dental Investigations Society, based in Turkey. It is a double-blinded peer-reviewed, Open Access, multi-disciplinary international journal addressing various aspects of dentistry. The journal''s board consists of eminent investigators in dentistry from across the globe and presents an ideal international composition. The journal encourages its authors to submit original investigations, reviews, and reports addressing various divisions of dentistry including oral pathology, prosthodontics, endodontics, orthodontics etc. It is available both online and in print.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信