{"title":"改良虚弱指数预测胃癌患者胃切除术后的预后:一项系统综述和荟萃分析。","authors":"Xinyao Zhou, Yunlan Jiang, Heyao Xu, Siyu Lin, Ting Xu, Xiaodi Bai, Shulan Liu","doi":"10.1002/jso.28136","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The predictive ability of the modified frailty index (mFI) for postoperative outcomes and survival in patients with gastric cancer (GC) remains uncertain.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Studies were retrieved from 11 electronic databases. Odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were used to report surgical outcomes, including overall survival (OS), complications, mortality, readmission, and nonhome discharge. The fixed or random effects model was used depending on the heterogeneity. Subgroup and meta-regression analyses were performed to determine the source of heterogeneity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This meta-analysis of 13 studies, including 15 359 GC patients, showed that high mFI scores were associated with reduced OS (OR = 1.35) and increased risk of poor postoperative outcomes (OR = 2.61). The older patients with higher mFI scores had a higher risk of worse OS after gastrectomy (OR = 1.69).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study demonstrated that high mFI scores were strongly associated with reduced OS and increased risk of poor outcomes following surgery in patients with GC, with a more than two-fold increase in the overall risk of poor outcomes. Compared to other tools, the mFI is easy to operate, making it an effective tool for prognosis assessment and personalized treatment and care planning.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>PROSPERO (Registration Number: CRD42024613727).</p>","PeriodicalId":17111,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Surgical Oncology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Modified Frailty Index Predicts Prognosis in Patients With Gastric Cancer After Gastrectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Xinyao Zhou, Yunlan Jiang, Heyao Xu, Siyu Lin, Ting Xu, Xiaodi Bai, Shulan Liu\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/jso.28136\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The predictive ability of the modified frailty index (mFI) for postoperative outcomes and survival in patients with gastric cancer (GC) remains uncertain.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Studies were retrieved from 11 electronic databases. Odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were used to report surgical outcomes, including overall survival (OS), complications, mortality, readmission, and nonhome discharge. The fixed or random effects model was used depending on the heterogeneity. Subgroup and meta-regression analyses were performed to determine the source of heterogeneity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This meta-analysis of 13 studies, including 15 359 GC patients, showed that high mFI scores were associated with reduced OS (OR = 1.35) and increased risk of poor postoperative outcomes (OR = 2.61). The older patients with higher mFI scores had a higher risk of worse OS after gastrectomy (OR = 1.69).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study demonstrated that high mFI scores were strongly associated with reduced OS and increased risk of poor outcomes following surgery in patients with GC, with a more than two-fold increase in the overall risk of poor outcomes. Compared to other tools, the mFI is easy to operate, making it an effective tool for prognosis assessment and personalized treatment and care planning.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>PROSPERO (Registration Number: CRD42024613727).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17111,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Surgical Oncology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Surgical Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/jso.28136\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Surgical Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jso.28136","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Modified Frailty Index Predicts Prognosis in Patients With Gastric Cancer After Gastrectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Background: The predictive ability of the modified frailty index (mFI) for postoperative outcomes and survival in patients with gastric cancer (GC) remains uncertain.
Methods: Studies were retrieved from 11 electronic databases. Odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were used to report surgical outcomes, including overall survival (OS), complications, mortality, readmission, and nonhome discharge. The fixed or random effects model was used depending on the heterogeneity. Subgroup and meta-regression analyses were performed to determine the source of heterogeneity.
Results: This meta-analysis of 13 studies, including 15 359 GC patients, showed that high mFI scores were associated with reduced OS (OR = 1.35) and increased risk of poor postoperative outcomes (OR = 2.61). The older patients with higher mFI scores had a higher risk of worse OS after gastrectomy (OR = 1.69).
Conclusions: This study demonstrated that high mFI scores were strongly associated with reduced OS and increased risk of poor outcomes following surgery in patients with GC, with a more than two-fold increase in the overall risk of poor outcomes. Compared to other tools, the mFI is easy to operate, making it an effective tool for prognosis assessment and personalized treatment and care planning.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Surgical Oncology offers peer-reviewed, original papers in the field of surgical oncology and broadly related surgical sciences, including reports on experimental and laboratory studies. As an international journal, the editors encourage participation from leading surgeons around the world. The JSO is the representative journal for the World Federation of Surgical Oncology Societies. Publishing 16 issues in 2 volumes each year, the journal accepts Research Articles, in-depth Reviews of timely interest, Letters to the Editor, and invited Editorials. Guest Editors from the JSO Editorial Board oversee multiple special Seminars issues each year. These Seminars include multifaceted Reviews on a particular topic or current issue in surgical oncology, which are invited from experts in the field.