改良虚弱指数预测胃癌患者胃切除术后的预后:一项系统综述和荟萃分析。

IF 2 3区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY
Xinyao Zhou, Yunlan Jiang, Heyao Xu, Siyu Lin, Ting Xu, Xiaodi Bai, Shulan Liu
{"title":"改良虚弱指数预测胃癌患者胃切除术后的预后:一项系统综述和荟萃分析。","authors":"Xinyao Zhou, Yunlan Jiang, Heyao Xu, Siyu Lin, Ting Xu, Xiaodi Bai, Shulan Liu","doi":"10.1002/jso.28136","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The predictive ability of the modified frailty index (mFI) for postoperative outcomes and survival in patients with gastric cancer (GC) remains uncertain.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Studies were retrieved from 11 electronic databases. Odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were used to report surgical outcomes, including overall survival (OS), complications, mortality, readmission, and nonhome discharge. The fixed or random effects model was used depending on the heterogeneity. Subgroup and meta-regression analyses were performed to determine the source of heterogeneity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This meta-analysis of 13 studies, including 15 359 GC patients, showed that high mFI scores were associated with reduced OS (OR = 1.35) and increased risk of poor postoperative outcomes (OR = 2.61). The older patients with higher mFI scores had a higher risk of worse OS after gastrectomy (OR = 1.69).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study demonstrated that high mFI scores were strongly associated with reduced OS and increased risk of poor outcomes following surgery in patients with GC, with a more than two-fold increase in the overall risk of poor outcomes. Compared to other tools, the mFI is easy to operate, making it an effective tool for prognosis assessment and personalized treatment and care planning.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>PROSPERO (Registration Number: CRD42024613727).</p>","PeriodicalId":17111,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Surgical Oncology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Modified Frailty Index Predicts Prognosis in Patients With Gastric Cancer After Gastrectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Xinyao Zhou, Yunlan Jiang, Heyao Xu, Siyu Lin, Ting Xu, Xiaodi Bai, Shulan Liu\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/jso.28136\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The predictive ability of the modified frailty index (mFI) for postoperative outcomes and survival in patients with gastric cancer (GC) remains uncertain.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Studies were retrieved from 11 electronic databases. Odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were used to report surgical outcomes, including overall survival (OS), complications, mortality, readmission, and nonhome discharge. The fixed or random effects model was used depending on the heterogeneity. Subgroup and meta-regression analyses were performed to determine the source of heterogeneity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This meta-analysis of 13 studies, including 15 359 GC patients, showed that high mFI scores were associated with reduced OS (OR = 1.35) and increased risk of poor postoperative outcomes (OR = 2.61). The older patients with higher mFI scores had a higher risk of worse OS after gastrectomy (OR = 1.69).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study demonstrated that high mFI scores were strongly associated with reduced OS and increased risk of poor outcomes following surgery in patients with GC, with a more than two-fold increase in the overall risk of poor outcomes. Compared to other tools, the mFI is easy to operate, making it an effective tool for prognosis assessment and personalized treatment and care planning.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>PROSPERO (Registration Number: CRD42024613727).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17111,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Surgical Oncology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Surgical Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/jso.28136\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Surgical Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jso.28136","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:改良虚弱指数(mFI)对胃癌(GC)患者术后预后和生存的预测能力尚不确定。方法:从11个电子数据库中检索研究。优势比(OR)和95%置信区间(CIs)用于报告手术结果,包括总生存期(OS)、并发症、死亡率、再入院和非家庭出院。根据异质性,采用固定效应或随机效应模型。进行亚组和元回归分析以确定异质性的来源。结果:对13项研究,包括15359例GC患者的荟萃分析显示,高mFI评分与OS降低(OR = 1.35)和术后不良预后风险增加(OR = 2.61)相关。mFI评分较高的老年患者胃切除术后发生不良OS的风险较高(OR = 1.69)。结论:本研究表明,高mFI评分与GC患者手术后OS降低和不良结局风险增加密切相关,不良结局总风险增加两倍以上。与其他工具相比,mFI易于操作,是评估预后和个性化治疗和护理计划的有效工具。试验注册:PROSPERO(注册号:CRD42024613727)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Modified Frailty Index Predicts Prognosis in Patients With Gastric Cancer After Gastrectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Background: The predictive ability of the modified frailty index (mFI) for postoperative outcomes and survival in patients with gastric cancer (GC) remains uncertain.

Methods: Studies were retrieved from 11 electronic databases. Odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were used to report surgical outcomes, including overall survival (OS), complications, mortality, readmission, and nonhome discharge. The fixed or random effects model was used depending on the heterogeneity. Subgroup and meta-regression analyses were performed to determine the source of heterogeneity.

Results: This meta-analysis of 13 studies, including 15 359 GC patients, showed that high mFI scores were associated with reduced OS (OR = 1.35) and increased risk of poor postoperative outcomes (OR = 2.61). The older patients with higher mFI scores had a higher risk of worse OS after gastrectomy (OR = 1.69).

Conclusions: This study demonstrated that high mFI scores were strongly associated with reduced OS and increased risk of poor outcomes following surgery in patients with GC, with a more than two-fold increase in the overall risk of poor outcomes. Compared to other tools, the mFI is easy to operate, making it an effective tool for prognosis assessment and personalized treatment and care planning.

Trial registration: PROSPERO (Registration Number: CRD42024613727).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
4.00%
发文量
367
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Surgical Oncology offers peer-reviewed, original papers in the field of surgical oncology and broadly related surgical sciences, including reports on experimental and laboratory studies. As an international journal, the editors encourage participation from leading surgeons around the world. The JSO is the representative journal for the World Federation of Surgical Oncology Societies. Publishing 16 issues in 2 volumes each year, the journal accepts Research Articles, in-depth Reviews of timely interest, Letters to the Editor, and invited Editorials. Guest Editors from the JSO Editorial Board oversee multiple special Seminars issues each year. These Seminars include multifaceted Reviews on a particular topic or current issue in surgical oncology, which are invited from experts in the field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信