社区药房非甾体类抗炎药不良反应的自我报告。

IF 3.3 Q1 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES
Journal of Pharmaceutical Policy and Practice Pub Date : 2025-04-04 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1080/20523211.2025.2483419
Phayom Sookaneknun Olson, Janet Krska, Chatmanee Taengthonglang, Pinyapat Tansin, Wilasinee Siangtrong, Piyatida Pongrueangdilok, Narumol Jarernsiripornkul, Pemmarin Potisarach
{"title":"社区药房非甾体类抗炎药不良反应的自我报告。","authors":"Phayom Sookaneknun Olson, Janet Krska, Chatmanee Taengthonglang, Pinyapat Tansin, Wilasinee Siangtrong, Piyatida Pongrueangdilok, Narumol Jarernsiripornkul, Pemmarin Potisarach","doi":"10.1080/20523211.2025.2483419","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Ibuprofen and diclofenac are nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs widely used worldwide. Spontaneous reporting often results in an underestimation of the incidence of adverse drug reactions (ADRs), and a few studies have been conducted in community settings, particularly in community pharmacies. This study aimed to determine the frequency and characteristics of short-term ADRs associated with ibuprofen and diclofenac in community pharmacy patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This prospective cohort study was conducted in 15 community pharmacies. A questionnaire from a previous study was modified and tested for content validity. Community pharmacists distributed the questionnaire after dispensing ibuprofen or diclofenac and followed non-responders via telephone and online media platforms. The returned questionnaires were assessed for causality by a pharmacist and three researchers. Descriptive analyses and comparisons between reports on ibuprofen and diclofenac were performed using chi-square and independent t-tests for appropriate outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 590 distributed questionnaires, 279 were included in the analysis. The percentage of participants who reported ADRs to ibuprofen and diclofenac was 33.3%. Among participants with suspected ADRs, the average number of suspected ADRs from diclofenac was higher than from ibuprofen; however, no significant difference was observed (5.5 ± 8.9 and 3.1 ± 3.0, <i>p</i> > 0.05). Of the 347 self-reported ADRs, 45.2% were assessed as probable and possible ADRs. The highest rate of suspected ADRs was in Mental Health (14.4%), followed by the Nose, Throat, Neck, or Voice (9.8%), and the Stomach or Digestive Systems (8.9%), respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Diclofenac showed more suspected ADRs than ibuprofen in a community setting. Almost half of the self-reported ADRs were assessed as probable or possible. Strategies for sustaining community pharmacists in monitoring patients and reporting ADRs should be supported.</p>","PeriodicalId":16740,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pharmaceutical Policy and Practice","volume":"18 1","pages":"2483419"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11998303/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Self-reporting of adverse drug reactions of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in community pharmacies.\",\"authors\":\"Phayom Sookaneknun Olson, Janet Krska, Chatmanee Taengthonglang, Pinyapat Tansin, Wilasinee Siangtrong, Piyatida Pongrueangdilok, Narumol Jarernsiripornkul, Pemmarin Potisarach\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/20523211.2025.2483419\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Ibuprofen and diclofenac are nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs widely used worldwide. Spontaneous reporting often results in an underestimation of the incidence of adverse drug reactions (ADRs), and a few studies have been conducted in community settings, particularly in community pharmacies. This study aimed to determine the frequency and characteristics of short-term ADRs associated with ibuprofen and diclofenac in community pharmacy patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This prospective cohort study was conducted in 15 community pharmacies. A questionnaire from a previous study was modified and tested for content validity. Community pharmacists distributed the questionnaire after dispensing ibuprofen or diclofenac and followed non-responders via telephone and online media platforms. The returned questionnaires were assessed for causality by a pharmacist and three researchers. Descriptive analyses and comparisons between reports on ibuprofen and diclofenac were performed using chi-square and independent t-tests for appropriate outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 590 distributed questionnaires, 279 were included in the analysis. The percentage of participants who reported ADRs to ibuprofen and diclofenac was 33.3%. Among participants with suspected ADRs, the average number of suspected ADRs from diclofenac was higher than from ibuprofen; however, no significant difference was observed (5.5 ± 8.9 and 3.1 ± 3.0, <i>p</i> > 0.05). Of the 347 self-reported ADRs, 45.2% were assessed as probable and possible ADRs. The highest rate of suspected ADRs was in Mental Health (14.4%), followed by the Nose, Throat, Neck, or Voice (9.8%), and the Stomach or Digestive Systems (8.9%), respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Diclofenac showed more suspected ADRs than ibuprofen in a community setting. Almost half of the self-reported ADRs were assessed as probable or possible. Strategies for sustaining community pharmacists in monitoring patients and reporting ADRs should be supported.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16740,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Pharmaceutical Policy and Practice\",\"volume\":\"18 1\",\"pages\":\"2483419\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11998303/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Pharmaceutical Policy and Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/20523211.2025.2483419\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pharmaceutical Policy and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/20523211.2025.2483419","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:布洛芬和双氯芬酸是世界范围内广泛使用的非甾体类抗炎药。自发报告往往导致对药物不良反应(adr)发生率的低估,在社区环境中,特别是在社区药房中进行了一些研究。本研究旨在确定社区药房患者与布洛芬和双氯芬酸相关的短期不良反应的频率和特征。方法:对15家社区药店进行前瞻性队列研究。对先前研究的问卷进行了修改和内容效度测试。社区药师在分配布洛芬或双氯芬酸后发放问卷,并通过电话和网络媒体平台对无应答者进行随访。一名药剂师和三名研究人员对返回的问卷进行了因果关系评估。对布洛芬和双氯芬酸的报告进行描述性分析和比较,采用卡方检验和独立t检验,以确定适当的结果。结果:发放的590份问卷中,279份纳入分析。报告布洛芬和双氯芬酸不良反应的参与者比例为33.3%。在疑似不良反应的受试者中,双氯芬酸的平均疑似不良反应数高于布洛芬;但两组差异无统计学意义(分别为5.5±8.9和3.1±3.0,p < 0.05)。在347例自我报告的不良反应中,45.2%被评估为可能和可能的不良反应。疑似不良反应发生率最高的是心理健康(14.4%),其次是鼻、喉、颈或声音(9.8%)和胃或消化系统(8.9%)。结论:在社区环境中,双氯芬酸比布洛芬出现更多的可疑不良反应。几乎一半的自我报告的不良反应被评估为可能或可能。应支持维持社区药剂师监测患者和报告不良反应的策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Self-reporting of adverse drug reactions of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in community pharmacies.

Background: Ibuprofen and diclofenac are nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs widely used worldwide. Spontaneous reporting often results in an underestimation of the incidence of adverse drug reactions (ADRs), and a few studies have been conducted in community settings, particularly in community pharmacies. This study aimed to determine the frequency and characteristics of short-term ADRs associated with ibuprofen and diclofenac in community pharmacy patients.

Methods: This prospective cohort study was conducted in 15 community pharmacies. A questionnaire from a previous study was modified and tested for content validity. Community pharmacists distributed the questionnaire after dispensing ibuprofen or diclofenac and followed non-responders via telephone and online media platforms. The returned questionnaires were assessed for causality by a pharmacist and three researchers. Descriptive analyses and comparisons between reports on ibuprofen and diclofenac were performed using chi-square and independent t-tests for appropriate outcomes.

Results: Of the 590 distributed questionnaires, 279 were included in the analysis. The percentage of participants who reported ADRs to ibuprofen and diclofenac was 33.3%. Among participants with suspected ADRs, the average number of suspected ADRs from diclofenac was higher than from ibuprofen; however, no significant difference was observed (5.5 ± 8.9 and 3.1 ± 3.0, p > 0.05). Of the 347 self-reported ADRs, 45.2% were assessed as probable and possible ADRs. The highest rate of suspected ADRs was in Mental Health (14.4%), followed by the Nose, Throat, Neck, or Voice (9.8%), and the Stomach or Digestive Systems (8.9%), respectively.

Conclusions: Diclofenac showed more suspected ADRs than ibuprofen in a community setting. Almost half of the self-reported ADRs were assessed as probable or possible. Strategies for sustaining community pharmacists in monitoring patients and reporting ADRs should be supported.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Pharmaceutical Policy and Practice
Journal of Pharmaceutical Policy and Practice Health Professions-Pharmacy
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
9.50%
发文量
81
审稿时长
14 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信