术中跨阻抗矩阵记录与x线影像检测耳蜗耳廓周围尖端折叠的敏感性和特异性:一项多中心研究。

IF 1.9 3区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Alexandra M Arambula, Robin Piper, Gail Murray, Sarah E Mowry, Alejandro Rivas, Maroun Semaan, Nauman F Manzoor, Daniel E Killeen, David C Kelsall, J Eric Lupo, Allison Biever, Katrina R Stidham, Regina Albinus, Samantha Morgan, Brian J Kaplan, Regina Presley, Sarah Menendez, Viral D Tejani
{"title":"术中跨阻抗矩阵记录与x线影像检测耳蜗耳廓周围尖端折叠的敏感性和特异性:一项多中心研究。","authors":"Alexandra M Arambula, Robin Piper, Gail Murray, Sarah E Mowry, Alejandro Rivas, Maroun Semaan, Nauman F Manzoor, Daniel E Killeen, David C Kelsall, J Eric Lupo, Allison Biever, Katrina R Stidham, Regina Albinus, Samantha Morgan, Brian J Kaplan, Regina Presley, Sarah Menendez, Viral D Tejani","doi":"10.1097/MAO.0000000000004502","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Characterize the sensitivity and specificity of TransImpedance Matrix (TIM) recordings compared with x-rays in detecting cochlear implant tip foldovers.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Retrospective.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Multi-institutional, academic and private surgery centers.</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>Patients 6 months and older undergoing cochlear implantation.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>After cochlear implant array insertion, intraoperative TIM recordings and x-rays were conducted to confirm appropriate placement. If a foldover was identified, repeat insertion, followed by TIM and x-ray, was performed.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>Presence of tip foldovers as determined by TIM recordings and x-rays.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 13 tip foldovers out of 484 insertions, yielding a 2.7% tip foldover rate. Using x-rays as the \"gold standard,\" TIM recordings showed 100% sensitivity, 99.6% specificity, 84.6% positive predictive value (PPV), and 100% negative predicative value in detecting tip foldovers. The x-ray images for two TIM-identified tip foldovers were interpreted as normal intraoperatively (apparent false positives), but then were interpreted as foldovers when presented to the operating surgeon postoperatively in a blinded fashion. If these false positives had been reclassified as true positives, TIM specificity and PPV would both improve to 100%.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These results provide further support regarding the utility of TIM recordings to evaluate appropriate cochlear implant electrode array position. Despite the low tip foldover rate reported across the literature and within this study, this multicenter patient group provided a large sample size to calculate the sensitivity and specificity of TIM recordings in identifying tip foldovers. Compared with the reference-standard, x-ray imaging, TIM recordings show equivalent, and in some cases superior, performance in identification of tip foldovers. Thus, use of TIM can potentially preclude the need for routine intraoperative x-rays without compromising patient care.</p>","PeriodicalId":19732,"journal":{"name":"Otology & Neurotology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Sensitivity and Specificity of Intraoperative TransImpedance Matrix Recordings Compared With X-ray Imaging in Detecting Perimodiolar Cochlear Implant Tip Foldovers: A Multicenter Study.\",\"authors\":\"Alexandra M Arambula, Robin Piper, Gail Murray, Sarah E Mowry, Alejandro Rivas, Maroun Semaan, Nauman F Manzoor, Daniel E Killeen, David C Kelsall, J Eric Lupo, Allison Biever, Katrina R Stidham, Regina Albinus, Samantha Morgan, Brian J Kaplan, Regina Presley, Sarah Menendez, Viral D Tejani\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/MAO.0000000000004502\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Characterize the sensitivity and specificity of TransImpedance Matrix (TIM) recordings compared with x-rays in detecting cochlear implant tip foldovers.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Retrospective.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Multi-institutional, academic and private surgery centers.</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>Patients 6 months and older undergoing cochlear implantation.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>After cochlear implant array insertion, intraoperative TIM recordings and x-rays were conducted to confirm appropriate placement. If a foldover was identified, repeat insertion, followed by TIM and x-ray, was performed.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>Presence of tip foldovers as determined by TIM recordings and x-rays.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 13 tip foldovers out of 484 insertions, yielding a 2.7% tip foldover rate. Using x-rays as the \\\"gold standard,\\\" TIM recordings showed 100% sensitivity, 99.6% specificity, 84.6% positive predictive value (PPV), and 100% negative predicative value in detecting tip foldovers. The x-ray images for two TIM-identified tip foldovers were interpreted as normal intraoperatively (apparent false positives), but then were interpreted as foldovers when presented to the operating surgeon postoperatively in a blinded fashion. If these false positives had been reclassified as true positives, TIM specificity and PPV would both improve to 100%.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These results provide further support regarding the utility of TIM recordings to evaluate appropriate cochlear implant electrode array position. Despite the low tip foldover rate reported across the literature and within this study, this multicenter patient group provided a large sample size to calculate the sensitivity and specificity of TIM recordings in identifying tip foldovers. Compared with the reference-standard, x-ray imaging, TIM recordings show equivalent, and in some cases superior, performance in identification of tip foldovers. Thus, use of TIM can potentially preclude the need for routine intraoperative x-rays without compromising patient care.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19732,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Otology & Neurotology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Otology & Neurotology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/MAO.0000000000004502\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Otology & Neurotology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MAO.0000000000004502","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:探讨跨阻抗矩阵(TIM)记录与x线检查人工耳蜗尖端折叠的敏感性和特异性。研究设计:回顾性。环境:多机构、学术和私人手术中心。患者:6个月及以上接受人工耳蜗植入的患者。干预措施:人工耳蜗阵列置入后,术中进行TIM记录和x线片检查以确定置入的合适位置。如果确定有折叠,重复插入,随后进行TIM和x线检查。主要结果测量:通过TIM记录和x射线确定鼻尖折叠的存在。结果:484次插入中有13次尖端折叠,尖端折叠率为2.7%。使用x射线作为“金标准”,TIM记录在检测尖端折叠方面显示出100%的灵敏度,99.6%的特异性,84.6%的阳性预测值(PPV)和100%的阴性预测值。两例经tim识别的尖端折叠的x线图像在术中被解释为正常(明显的假阳性),但在术后以盲法提交给外科医生时被解释为折叠。如果这些假阳性被重新分类为真阳性,TIM特异性和PPV都将提高到100%。结论:这些结果进一步支持了TIM记录在评估合适的人工耳蜗电极阵列位置方面的应用。尽管文献和本研究中报道的鼻尖折叠率较低,但该多中心患者组提供了大量样本来计算TIM记录在识别鼻尖折叠方面的敏感性和特异性。与参考标准x射线成像相比,TIM记录在识别尖端折叠方面表现相当,在某些情况下表现更好。因此,使用TIM可以在不影响患者护理的情况下潜在地排除常规术中x光检查的需要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Sensitivity and Specificity of Intraoperative TransImpedance Matrix Recordings Compared With X-ray Imaging in Detecting Perimodiolar Cochlear Implant Tip Foldovers: A Multicenter Study.

Objective: Characterize the sensitivity and specificity of TransImpedance Matrix (TIM) recordings compared with x-rays in detecting cochlear implant tip foldovers.

Study design: Retrospective.

Setting: Multi-institutional, academic and private surgery centers.

Patients: Patients 6 months and older undergoing cochlear implantation.

Interventions: After cochlear implant array insertion, intraoperative TIM recordings and x-rays were conducted to confirm appropriate placement. If a foldover was identified, repeat insertion, followed by TIM and x-ray, was performed.

Main outcome measures: Presence of tip foldovers as determined by TIM recordings and x-rays.

Results: There were 13 tip foldovers out of 484 insertions, yielding a 2.7% tip foldover rate. Using x-rays as the "gold standard," TIM recordings showed 100% sensitivity, 99.6% specificity, 84.6% positive predictive value (PPV), and 100% negative predicative value in detecting tip foldovers. The x-ray images for two TIM-identified tip foldovers were interpreted as normal intraoperatively (apparent false positives), but then were interpreted as foldovers when presented to the operating surgeon postoperatively in a blinded fashion. If these false positives had been reclassified as true positives, TIM specificity and PPV would both improve to 100%.

Conclusions: These results provide further support regarding the utility of TIM recordings to evaluate appropriate cochlear implant electrode array position. Despite the low tip foldover rate reported across the literature and within this study, this multicenter patient group provided a large sample size to calculate the sensitivity and specificity of TIM recordings in identifying tip foldovers. Compared with the reference-standard, x-ray imaging, TIM recordings show equivalent, and in some cases superior, performance in identification of tip foldovers. Thus, use of TIM can potentially preclude the need for routine intraoperative x-rays without compromising patient care.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Otology & Neurotology
Otology & Neurotology 医学-耳鼻喉科学
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
14.30%
发文量
509
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: ​​​​​Otology & Neurotology publishes original articles relating to both clinical and basic science aspects of otology, neurotology, and cranial base surgery. As the foremost journal in its field, it has become the favored place for publishing the best of new science relating to the human ear and its diseases. The broadly international character of its contributing authors, editorial board, and readership provides the Journal its decidedly global perspective.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信