游戏特征和治疗相关因素如何促进基于技术的失语症康复的泛化:系统回顾。

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
NeuroRehabilitation Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-12 DOI:10.1177/10538135241296737
Georgii Gorshkov, Olga Buivolova, Elena Gavrilova, Olga Dragoy
{"title":"游戏特征和治疗相关因素如何促进基于技术的失语症康复的泛化:系统回顾。","authors":"Georgii Gorshkov, Olga Buivolova, Elena Gavrilova, Olga Dragoy","doi":"10.1177/10538135241296737","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BackgroundNowadays, developers offer mobile applications for aphasia treatment. Although their overall effectiveness and acceptance by the target audience was proved, it has not been established what aspects of technology-based aphasia rehabilitation facilitate these improvements and translate into generalization.ObjectiveThe objectives were to analyze what technology- and treatment-related factors, including treatment dose, intensity and duration, affect treatment efficacy and facilitate generalization.MethodsThe PubMed and ScienceDirect databases were searched in February 2024. The review included experimental articles testing mobile- or computer-based applications for aphasia rehabilitation. Studies were excluded if they described AAC techniques or assistive tools, or focused solely on quality of life. ROB-2 was used to assess risk of bias in the included randomized controlled trials.ResultsEighteen articles meeting the inclusion criteria were analyzed. The key factors increasing the therapy effect and leading to generalization were automatic feedback, diversity of the tasks employed in the training, longer periods of treatment, and interaction between the user and the clinician.ConclusionsTechnology-based aphasia treatment is an effective therapy tool. Contact with the clinician, simultaneous practice targeted at various language domains and executive functions, as well as feedback, positively influence outcomes. The review, however, has limitations, as it lacks statistical analysis and synthesizes heterogeneous data.</p>","PeriodicalId":19717,"journal":{"name":"NeuroRehabilitation","volume":"56 2","pages":"113-131"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"How Game Features and Treatment-Related Factors Facilitate Generalization in Technology-Based Aphasia Rehabilitation: A Systematic Review.\",\"authors\":\"Georgii Gorshkov, Olga Buivolova, Elena Gavrilova, Olga Dragoy\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/10538135241296737\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>BackgroundNowadays, developers offer mobile applications for aphasia treatment. Although their overall effectiveness and acceptance by the target audience was proved, it has not been established what aspects of technology-based aphasia rehabilitation facilitate these improvements and translate into generalization.ObjectiveThe objectives were to analyze what technology- and treatment-related factors, including treatment dose, intensity and duration, affect treatment efficacy and facilitate generalization.MethodsThe PubMed and ScienceDirect databases were searched in February 2024. The review included experimental articles testing mobile- or computer-based applications for aphasia rehabilitation. Studies were excluded if they described AAC techniques or assistive tools, or focused solely on quality of life. ROB-2 was used to assess risk of bias in the included randomized controlled trials.ResultsEighteen articles meeting the inclusion criteria were analyzed. The key factors increasing the therapy effect and leading to generalization were automatic feedback, diversity of the tasks employed in the training, longer periods of treatment, and interaction between the user and the clinician.ConclusionsTechnology-based aphasia treatment is an effective therapy tool. Contact with the clinician, simultaneous practice targeted at various language domains and executive functions, as well as feedback, positively influence outcomes. The review, however, has limitations, as it lacks statistical analysis and synthesizes heterogeneous data.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19717,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"NeuroRehabilitation\",\"volume\":\"56 2\",\"pages\":\"113-131\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"NeuroRehabilitation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/10538135241296737\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/12 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"NeuroRehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10538135241296737","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

如今,开发人员提供了治疗失语症的移动应用程序。虽然它们的整体有效性和目标受众的接受度得到了证明,但尚未确定以技术为基础的失语康复的哪些方面促进了这些改进并转化为推广。目的分析治疗剂量、治疗强度、治疗时间等技术和治疗相关因素对治疗效果的影响,促进治疗的推广。方法于2024年2月检索PubMed和ScienceDirect数据库。这篇综述包括测试基于移动或计算机的失语症康复应用程序的实验文章。如果研究描述AAC技术或辅助工具,或仅关注生活质量,则排除研究。rob2用于评估纳入的随机对照试验的偏倚风险。结果共分析符合纳入标准的文献18篇。提高治疗效果并导致泛化的关键因素是自动反馈、训练任务的多样性、较长的治疗周期以及使用者与临床医生之间的互动。结论基于技术的失语症治疗是一种有效的治疗手段。与临床医生接触,针对不同语言领域和执行功能的同时练习,以及反馈,对结果产生积极影响。然而,由于缺乏统计分析和综合异质数据,该综述存在局限性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
How Game Features and Treatment-Related Factors Facilitate Generalization in Technology-Based Aphasia Rehabilitation: A Systematic Review.

BackgroundNowadays, developers offer mobile applications for aphasia treatment. Although their overall effectiveness and acceptance by the target audience was proved, it has not been established what aspects of technology-based aphasia rehabilitation facilitate these improvements and translate into generalization.ObjectiveThe objectives were to analyze what technology- and treatment-related factors, including treatment dose, intensity and duration, affect treatment efficacy and facilitate generalization.MethodsThe PubMed and ScienceDirect databases were searched in February 2024. The review included experimental articles testing mobile- or computer-based applications for aphasia rehabilitation. Studies were excluded if they described AAC techniques or assistive tools, or focused solely on quality of life. ROB-2 was used to assess risk of bias in the included randomized controlled trials.ResultsEighteen articles meeting the inclusion criteria were analyzed. The key factors increasing the therapy effect and leading to generalization were automatic feedback, diversity of the tasks employed in the training, longer periods of treatment, and interaction between the user and the clinician.ConclusionsTechnology-based aphasia treatment is an effective therapy tool. Contact with the clinician, simultaneous practice targeted at various language domains and executive functions, as well as feedback, positively influence outcomes. The review, however, has limitations, as it lacks statistical analysis and synthesizes heterogeneous data.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
NeuroRehabilitation
NeuroRehabilitation CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-REHABILITATION
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
178
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: NeuroRehabilitation, an international, interdisciplinary, peer-reviewed journal, publishes manuscripts focused on scientifically based, practical information relevant to all aspects of neurologic rehabilitation. We publish unsolicited papers detailing original work/research that covers the full life span and range of neurological disabilities including stroke, spinal cord injury, traumatic brain injury, neuromuscular disease and other neurological disorders. We also publish thematically organized issues that focus on specific clinical disorders, types of therapy and age groups. Proposals for thematic issues and suggestions for issue editors are welcomed.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信