参与者情绪弹性检查:一种研究技术。

IF 2.6 2区 医学 Q2 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE
Meaghan Storey, Jessica Sutherland
{"title":"参与者情绪弹性检查:一种研究技术。","authors":"Meaghan Storey, Jessica Sutherland","doi":"10.1177/10497323251336637","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>There is a well-established and growing literature on engaging and working with communities throughout the research process. Co-design and collaborative research are becoming common practice among researchers and increasingly a funding incentive and institutional commitment. Research methodologies have been created to formalize these processes and guide both new and experienced researchers wishing to engage in such research. However, gaps around process remain within the literature and research teams are often left to design their own techniques and protocols. Participant Emotional Resiliency Check-ins (PERCs), a term and research technique designed by the authors, aim to facilitate timely participant reflection on their emotional resiliency and to direct their participation in sensitive research accordingly. This research technique takes a strength-based and trauma-informed approach and most importantly is conducted by a peer worker. In this paper, we outline the PERC technique and identify its key features. We also share our considerations and learnings for other research teams wanting to engage in collaborative, sensitive research.</p>","PeriodicalId":48437,"journal":{"name":"Qualitative Health Research","volume":" ","pages":"10497323251336637"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Participant Emotional Resiliency Check-In: A Research Technique.\",\"authors\":\"Meaghan Storey, Jessica Sutherland\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/10497323251336637\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>There is a well-established and growing literature on engaging and working with communities throughout the research process. Co-design and collaborative research are becoming common practice among researchers and increasingly a funding incentive and institutional commitment. Research methodologies have been created to formalize these processes and guide both new and experienced researchers wishing to engage in such research. However, gaps around process remain within the literature and research teams are often left to design their own techniques and protocols. Participant Emotional Resiliency Check-ins (PERCs), a term and research technique designed by the authors, aim to facilitate timely participant reflection on their emotional resiliency and to direct their participation in sensitive research accordingly. This research technique takes a strength-based and trauma-informed approach and most importantly is conducted by a peer worker. In this paper, we outline the PERC technique and identify its key features. We also share our considerations and learnings for other research teams wanting to engage in collaborative, sensitive research.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48437,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Qualitative Health Research\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"10497323251336637\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Qualitative Health Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/10497323251336637\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Qualitative Health Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10497323251336637","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在整个研究过程中,关于与社区接触和合作的文献已经得到了完善和不断增长。共同设计和合作研究正在成为研究人员之间的普遍做法,并日益成为一种资金激励和机构承诺。研究方法的创建是为了使这些过程正式化,并指导希望从事此类研究的新研究人员和有经验的研究人员。然而,关于过程的差距仍然存在于文献中,研究团队经常被留下来设计他们自己的技术和协议。参与者情绪弹性检查(PERCs)是作者设计的一个术语和研究方法,旨在促进参与者及时反思他们的情绪弹性,并据此指导他们参与敏感研究。这项研究技术采用基于力量和创伤的方法,最重要的是由同伴工作者进行。在本文中,我们概述了PERC技术,并确定了其主要特点。我们还分享了我们对其他想要从事合作、敏感研究的研究团队的考虑和学习。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Participant Emotional Resiliency Check-In: A Research Technique.

There is a well-established and growing literature on engaging and working with communities throughout the research process. Co-design and collaborative research are becoming common practice among researchers and increasingly a funding incentive and institutional commitment. Research methodologies have been created to formalize these processes and guide both new and experienced researchers wishing to engage in such research. However, gaps around process remain within the literature and research teams are often left to design their own techniques and protocols. Participant Emotional Resiliency Check-ins (PERCs), a term and research technique designed by the authors, aim to facilitate timely participant reflection on their emotional resiliency and to direct their participation in sensitive research accordingly. This research technique takes a strength-based and trauma-informed approach and most importantly is conducted by a peer worker. In this paper, we outline the PERC technique and identify its key features. We also share our considerations and learnings for other research teams wanting to engage in collaborative, sensitive research.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
6.20%
发文量
109
期刊介绍: QUALITATIVE HEALTH RESEARCH is an international, interdisciplinary, refereed journal for the enhancement of health care and to further the development and understanding of qualitative research methods in health care settings. We welcome manuscripts in the following areas: the description and analysis of the illness experience, health and health-seeking behaviors, the experiences of caregivers, the sociocultural organization of health care, health care policy, and related topics. We also seek critical reviews and commentaries addressing conceptual, theoretical, methodological, and ethical issues pertaining to qualitative enquiry.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信