降温毯对中暑患者早期体温管理的疗效:一项多中心回顾性队列研究。

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare Pub Date : 2025-05-09 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.2147/JMDH.S522541
Lan Chen, Dingping Jin, Zhumei Gong, Liyun Lu, Junlu Zhao, Shuying Xu, Xiaoling Yang, Yuping Zhang, Xiuqin Feng
{"title":"降温毯对中暑患者早期体温管理的疗效:一项多中心回顾性队列研究。","authors":"Lan Chen, Dingping Jin, Zhumei Gong, Liyun Lu, Junlu Zhao, Shuying Xu, Xiaoling Yang, Yuping Zhang, Xiuqin Feng","doi":"10.2147/JMDH.S522541","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Water circulation cooling blankets are commonly used in heat stroke management, but their efficacy and safety remain insufficiently studied. This study aimed to assess the cooling effect of the cooling blanket within the first 24 hours after emergency department admission in patients with heat stroke.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Retrospective data were collected from six hospitals. The primary outcomes included body temperature at 0.5 and 2 hours post-treatment and changes in temperature during these intervals. The cooling effect was assessed using logistic regression, generalized additive mixed models, and genetic and propensity score matching. Test effectiveness was evaluated based on the non-inferiority test formula.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 191 patients were included, with 84 (44.0%) receiving cooling with the blanket. The mean cooling duration was 2 hours. Body temperatures at 0.5 hours were 39.80 ± 0.96 °C in the cooling blanket group versus 39.26 ± 0.94 °C in the non-cooling blanket group. At 2 hours, temperatures were 38.08 ± 1.00 °C and 37.84 ± 0.96 °C, respectively. No significant differences were found in body temperature at 0.5 hours (β, -0.19 [95% CI, -0.50, 0.12]; P = 0.242) or 2 hours (β, -0.24 [95% CI, -0.57, 0.09]; P = 0.161) between the cooling blanket and non-cooling blanket groups. Similarly, no significant differences in temperature changes at 0.5 or 2 hours were observed. After adjusting for propensity scores, no differences in temperature were found in the matching cohort. The non-inferiority criterion was met, with effectiveness scores of 1.000 at 0.5 hours and 0.998 at 2 hours.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The cooling blanket demonstrated no significant temperature reduction advantage compared to the non-cooling blanket group. High-quality randomized controlled trials remain necessary to further evaluate its therapeutic role in heat stroke management.</p>","PeriodicalId":16357,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare","volume":"18 ","pages":"2629-2639"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12071754/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficacy of Cooling Blankets for Early Temperature Management in Heat Stroke Patients: A Multicenter Retrospective Cohort Study.\",\"authors\":\"Lan Chen, Dingping Jin, Zhumei Gong, Liyun Lu, Junlu Zhao, Shuying Xu, Xiaoling Yang, Yuping Zhang, Xiuqin Feng\",\"doi\":\"10.2147/JMDH.S522541\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Water circulation cooling blankets are commonly used in heat stroke management, but their efficacy and safety remain insufficiently studied. This study aimed to assess the cooling effect of the cooling blanket within the first 24 hours after emergency department admission in patients with heat stroke.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Retrospective data were collected from six hospitals. The primary outcomes included body temperature at 0.5 and 2 hours post-treatment and changes in temperature during these intervals. The cooling effect was assessed using logistic regression, generalized additive mixed models, and genetic and propensity score matching. Test effectiveness was evaluated based on the non-inferiority test formula.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 191 patients were included, with 84 (44.0%) receiving cooling with the blanket. The mean cooling duration was 2 hours. Body temperatures at 0.5 hours were 39.80 ± 0.96 °C in the cooling blanket group versus 39.26 ± 0.94 °C in the non-cooling blanket group. At 2 hours, temperatures were 38.08 ± 1.00 °C and 37.84 ± 0.96 °C, respectively. No significant differences were found in body temperature at 0.5 hours (β, -0.19 [95% CI, -0.50, 0.12]; P = 0.242) or 2 hours (β, -0.24 [95% CI, -0.57, 0.09]; P = 0.161) between the cooling blanket and non-cooling blanket groups. Similarly, no significant differences in temperature changes at 0.5 or 2 hours were observed. After adjusting for propensity scores, no differences in temperature were found in the matching cohort. The non-inferiority criterion was met, with effectiveness scores of 1.000 at 0.5 hours and 0.998 at 2 hours.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The cooling blanket demonstrated no significant temperature reduction advantage compared to the non-cooling blanket group. High-quality randomized controlled trials remain necessary to further evaluate its therapeutic role in heat stroke management.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16357,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare\",\"volume\":\"18 \",\"pages\":\"2629-2639\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12071754/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2147/JMDH.S522541\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/JMDH.S522541","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:水循环冷却毯在中暑治疗中常用,但其疗效和安全性研究不足。本研究旨在评估中暑患者急诊入院后24小时内降温毯的降温效果。方法:收集6家医院的回顾性资料。主要结果包括治疗后0.5小时和2小时的体温以及这段时间内的体温变化。使用逻辑回归、广义加性混合模型以及遗传和倾向评分匹配来评估冷却效果。试验有效性根据非劣效性检验公式进行评价。结果:共纳入191例患者,其中84例(44.0%)采用毯子降温。平均降温时间为2小时。降温毯组0.5小时体温为39.80±0.96°C,非降温毯组为39.26±0.94°C。2小时时,温度分别为38.08±1.00℃和37.84±0.96℃。0.5小时体温无显著差异(β, -0.19 [95% CI, -0.50, 0.12];P = 0.242)或2小时(β,-0.24(95%可信区间,-0.57,0.09);P = 0.161)。同样,在0.5小时或2小时的温度变化没有观察到显著差异。在调整倾向得分后,在匹配队列中没有发现温度差异。满足非劣效性标准,0.5 h和2 h的疗效评分分别为1.000和0.998。结论:与非降温毯组相比,降温毯无明显降温优势。高质量的随机对照试验仍有必要进一步评估其在中暑管理中的治疗作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Efficacy of Cooling Blankets for Early Temperature Management in Heat Stroke Patients: A Multicenter Retrospective Cohort Study.

Objective: Water circulation cooling blankets are commonly used in heat stroke management, but their efficacy and safety remain insufficiently studied. This study aimed to assess the cooling effect of the cooling blanket within the first 24 hours after emergency department admission in patients with heat stroke.

Methods: Retrospective data were collected from six hospitals. The primary outcomes included body temperature at 0.5 and 2 hours post-treatment and changes in temperature during these intervals. The cooling effect was assessed using logistic regression, generalized additive mixed models, and genetic and propensity score matching. Test effectiveness was evaluated based on the non-inferiority test formula.

Results: A total of 191 patients were included, with 84 (44.0%) receiving cooling with the blanket. The mean cooling duration was 2 hours. Body temperatures at 0.5 hours were 39.80 ± 0.96 °C in the cooling blanket group versus 39.26 ± 0.94 °C in the non-cooling blanket group. At 2 hours, temperatures were 38.08 ± 1.00 °C and 37.84 ± 0.96 °C, respectively. No significant differences were found in body temperature at 0.5 hours (β, -0.19 [95% CI, -0.50, 0.12]; P = 0.242) or 2 hours (β, -0.24 [95% CI, -0.57, 0.09]; P = 0.161) between the cooling blanket and non-cooling blanket groups. Similarly, no significant differences in temperature changes at 0.5 or 2 hours were observed. After adjusting for propensity scores, no differences in temperature were found in the matching cohort. The non-inferiority criterion was met, with effectiveness scores of 1.000 at 0.5 hours and 0.998 at 2 hours.

Conclusion: The cooling blanket demonstrated no significant temperature reduction advantage compared to the non-cooling blanket group. High-quality randomized controlled trials remain necessary to further evaluate its therapeutic role in heat stroke management.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare
Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare Nursing-General Nursing
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
3.00%
发文量
287
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare (JMDH) aims to represent and publish research in healthcare areas delivered by practitioners of different disciplines. This includes studies and reviews conducted by multidisciplinary teams as well as research which evaluates or reports the results or conduct of such teams or healthcare processes in general. The journal covers a very wide range of areas and we welcome submissions from practitioners at all levels and from all over the world. Good healthcare is not bounded by person, place or time and the journal aims to reflect this. The JMDH is published as an open-access journal to allow this wide range of practical, patient relevant research to be immediately available to practitioners who can access and use it immediately upon publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信