机器人辅助椎弓根克氏针置入手术的非导航误差模拟与分析。

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS
Yongkang Yang, Yishi Jia, Chang Liu, Liang Li, Boyao Wang
{"title":"机器人辅助椎弓根克氏针置入手术的非导航误差模拟与分析。","authors":"Yongkang Yang, Yishi Jia, Chang Liu, Liang Li, Boyao Wang","doi":"10.1186/s13018-025-05790-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Surgical errors of orthopedics robotic are influenced by a multitude of factors. This study aims to investigate the impact of non-navigational errors on the accuracy of pedicle screw placement in orthopedic surgery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Initially, a robot-assisted Kirschner wire (K-wire) placement simulation system was constructed, comprising a universal arm, wide-angle cameras, microscope cameras, and a vertebral base. Utilizing this system, we conducted a systematic analysis of the effects of four factors on non-navigational errors: operator habits, guide-to-bone surface distance, robotic arm stiffness, and vertebral fixation stiffness.We investigated two distinct operator habits: Habit 1 involves first positioning the K-wire against the bone surface through the guide and then inserting it using a bone drill; Habit 2 involves clamping the K-wire onto the bone drill and then inserting it together. Based on the control variable method, we designed precision measurement experiments for K-wire placement under different factors, forming 26 variable combinations to investigate the K-wire placement errors under each factor and their proportions in the overall error.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 933 K-wire placements were performed in this study. The average deviation under Habit 2 conditions was 0.51 mm, compared to 0.13 mm under Habit 1 conditions; the average deviation was 0.36 mm when the guide-to-bone surface distance was 5 cm, and 0.28 mm when the distance was 1 cm; the average deviation was 0.36 mm under the 600 mm robotic arm condition, and 0.24 mm under the 500 mm robotic arm condition; the average deviation was 0.37 mm in the Plaster-Fixed Vertebra Group, and 0.85 mm in the Silicone-Fixed Vertebra Group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Operator habits and vertebral fixation stiffness are the primary factors influencing non-navigational errors, while guide-to-bone surface distance and robotic arm stiffness are secondary factors. This study recommends adopting Habit 1 in clinical surgeries, minimizing the guide-to-bone surface distance, and enhancing the stiffness of the robotic arm and vertebral fixation to reduce non-navigational errors and improve the accuracy of robot-assisted pedicle screw placement.</p>","PeriodicalId":16629,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research","volume":"20 1","pages":"440"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12046730/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Simulation and analysis of non-navigational errors in robot-assisted pedicle Kirschner wire placement surgery.\",\"authors\":\"Yongkang Yang, Yishi Jia, Chang Liu, Liang Li, Boyao Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s13018-025-05790-4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Surgical errors of orthopedics robotic are influenced by a multitude of factors. This study aims to investigate the impact of non-navigational errors on the accuracy of pedicle screw placement in orthopedic surgery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Initially, a robot-assisted Kirschner wire (K-wire) placement simulation system was constructed, comprising a universal arm, wide-angle cameras, microscope cameras, and a vertebral base. Utilizing this system, we conducted a systematic analysis of the effects of four factors on non-navigational errors: operator habits, guide-to-bone surface distance, robotic arm stiffness, and vertebral fixation stiffness.We investigated two distinct operator habits: Habit 1 involves first positioning the K-wire against the bone surface through the guide and then inserting it using a bone drill; Habit 2 involves clamping the K-wire onto the bone drill and then inserting it together. Based on the control variable method, we designed precision measurement experiments for K-wire placement under different factors, forming 26 variable combinations to investigate the K-wire placement errors under each factor and their proportions in the overall error.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 933 K-wire placements were performed in this study. The average deviation under Habit 2 conditions was 0.51 mm, compared to 0.13 mm under Habit 1 conditions; the average deviation was 0.36 mm when the guide-to-bone surface distance was 5 cm, and 0.28 mm when the distance was 1 cm; the average deviation was 0.36 mm under the 600 mm robotic arm condition, and 0.24 mm under the 500 mm robotic arm condition; the average deviation was 0.37 mm in the Plaster-Fixed Vertebra Group, and 0.85 mm in the Silicone-Fixed Vertebra Group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Operator habits and vertebral fixation stiffness are the primary factors influencing non-navigational errors, while guide-to-bone surface distance and robotic arm stiffness are secondary factors. This study recommends adopting Habit 1 in clinical surgeries, minimizing the guide-to-bone surface distance, and enhancing the stiffness of the robotic arm and vertebral fixation to reduce non-navigational errors and improve the accuracy of robot-assisted pedicle screw placement.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16629,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research\",\"volume\":\"20 1\",\"pages\":\"440\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12046730/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-025-05790-4\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-025-05790-4","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:骨科机器人的手术失误受到多种因素的影响。本研究旨在探讨骨科手术中非导航误差对椎弓根螺钉置入准确性的影响。方法:首先,构建了一个机器人辅助克氏针(k -丝)放置模拟系统,包括通用臂、广角相机、显微镜相机和椎体底座。利用该系统,我们系统分析了四个因素对非导航误差的影响:操作员习惯、导轨与骨表面距离、机械臂刚度和椎体固定刚度。我们研究了两种不同的操作习惯:习惯1包括首先通过导针将k线固定在骨表面,然后使用骨钻将其插入;习惯二是将k线夹在骨钻上,然后一起插入。基于控制变量法,设计了不同因素下k线放置精度测量实验,形成26个变量组合,研究各因素下k线放置误差及其在整体误差中的比例。结果:本研究共进行了933次k线放置。习惯2条件下的平均偏差为0.51 mm,习惯1条件下的平均偏差为0.13 mm;当导骨与骨表面距离为5 cm时,平均偏差为0.36 mm,距离为1 cm时,平均偏差为0.28 mm;600 mm机械臂条件下的平均偏差为0.36 mm, 500 mm机械臂条件下的平均偏差为0.24 mm;石膏固定椎体组平均偏差为0.37 mm,硅胶固定椎体组平均偏差为0.85 mm。结论:操作者习惯和椎体固定刚度是影响非导航误差的主要因素,导骨表面距离和机械臂刚度是影响非导航误差的次要因素。本研究建议在临床手术中采用习惯1,尽量减小导轨与骨表面的距离,增强机械臂和椎体固定的刚度,以减少非导航误差,提高机器人辅助椎弓根螺钉置入的精度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Simulation and analysis of non-navigational errors in robot-assisted pedicle Kirschner wire placement surgery.

Background: Surgical errors of orthopedics robotic are influenced by a multitude of factors. This study aims to investigate the impact of non-navigational errors on the accuracy of pedicle screw placement in orthopedic surgery.

Methods: Initially, a robot-assisted Kirschner wire (K-wire) placement simulation system was constructed, comprising a universal arm, wide-angle cameras, microscope cameras, and a vertebral base. Utilizing this system, we conducted a systematic analysis of the effects of four factors on non-navigational errors: operator habits, guide-to-bone surface distance, robotic arm stiffness, and vertebral fixation stiffness.We investigated two distinct operator habits: Habit 1 involves first positioning the K-wire against the bone surface through the guide and then inserting it using a bone drill; Habit 2 involves clamping the K-wire onto the bone drill and then inserting it together. Based on the control variable method, we designed precision measurement experiments for K-wire placement under different factors, forming 26 variable combinations to investigate the K-wire placement errors under each factor and their proportions in the overall error.

Results: A total of 933 K-wire placements were performed in this study. The average deviation under Habit 2 conditions was 0.51 mm, compared to 0.13 mm under Habit 1 conditions; the average deviation was 0.36 mm when the guide-to-bone surface distance was 5 cm, and 0.28 mm when the distance was 1 cm; the average deviation was 0.36 mm under the 600 mm robotic arm condition, and 0.24 mm under the 500 mm robotic arm condition; the average deviation was 0.37 mm in the Plaster-Fixed Vertebra Group, and 0.85 mm in the Silicone-Fixed Vertebra Group.

Conclusions: Operator habits and vertebral fixation stiffness are the primary factors influencing non-navigational errors, while guide-to-bone surface distance and robotic arm stiffness are secondary factors. This study recommends adopting Habit 1 in clinical surgeries, minimizing the guide-to-bone surface distance, and enhancing the stiffness of the robotic arm and vertebral fixation to reduce non-navigational errors and improve the accuracy of robot-assisted pedicle screw placement.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
7.70%
发文量
494
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research is an open access journal that encompasses all aspects of clinical and basic research studies related to musculoskeletal issues. Orthopaedic research is conducted at clinical and basic science levels. With the advancement of new technologies and the increasing expectation and demand from doctors and patients, we are witnessing an enormous growth in clinical orthopaedic research, particularly in the fields of traumatology, spinal surgery, joint replacement, sports medicine, musculoskeletal tumour management, hand microsurgery, foot and ankle surgery, paediatric orthopaedic, and orthopaedic rehabilitation. The involvement of basic science ranges from molecular, cellular, structural and functional perspectives to tissue engineering, gait analysis, automation and robotic surgery. Implant and biomaterial designs are new disciplines that complement clinical applications. JOSR encourages the publication of multidisciplinary research with collaboration amongst clinicians and scientists from different disciplines, which will be the trend in the coming decades.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信