中低收入国家的结直肠癌放疗使用率——印度尼西亚的一项多中心研究。

IF 2.9 Q2 ONCOLOGY
Wspolczesna Onkologia-Contemporary Oncology Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2025-04-09 DOI:10.5114/wo.2025.149236
Vito Filbert Jayalie, Gregorius Ben Prajogi, Tiara Bunga Mayang Permata, Handoko, Soehartati Gondhowiardjo
{"title":"中低收入国家的结直肠癌放疗使用率——印度尼西亚的一项多中心研究。","authors":"Vito Filbert Jayalie, Gregorius Ben Prajogi, Tiara Bunga Mayang Permata, Handoko, Soehartati Gondhowiardjo","doi":"10.5114/wo.2025.149236","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Despite the rising application of radiotherapy for cancer in Indonesia, no known radiotherapy utilization rate (RUR) figure has been produced for colon and rectal cancer in Indonesia. This study aims to depict the actual and optimal RUR for colon and rectal cancer in Indonesia.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Secondary data was obtained from hospitals providing radiotherapy services in Indonesia, and descriptive analysis was conducted in April-September 2022.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Actual RUR (aRUR) of colon cancer was 5.3%, yet the calculated optimal RUR (oRUR) was 3.3% (3-3.7%) with an unmet need percentage of -60.6% [-76.7-(-43.2)%]. Actual RUR of rectal cancer in Indonesia was 19.5%, while calculated oRUR was 41% (28-66%) with an unmet need percentage of 52.4% (30.4-70.5%). In combination, 26.21% and 14.9% were the final calculation of colorectal cancer oRUR and aRUR, resulting in 45.5% (21.4-65.6%) unmet need. A substantial difference was also observed when sensitivity analysis was incorporated, with the percentage of unmet needs for colon and rectal cancer ranging from -76.7 to 86.5% and 2.2-94.2%, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>There is a gap between aRUR and oRUR of colorectal cancer. Although oRUR of colon cancer seems to have been met, a significant gap persisted between oRUR and aRUR in rectal cancer. However, when sensitivity analysis was incorporated, notable disparity persisted for both colon and rectal cancer. Patient, clinician, and bureaucratic factors should be considered in increasing the RUR of colon and rectal cancer.</p>","PeriodicalId":49354,"journal":{"name":"Wspolczesna Onkologia-Contemporary Oncology","volume":"29 1","pages":"113-122"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12051874/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Colorectal cancer radiotherapy utilization rate in a low-middle income country - a multicenter study in Indonesia.\",\"authors\":\"Vito Filbert Jayalie, Gregorius Ben Prajogi, Tiara Bunga Mayang Permata, Handoko, Soehartati Gondhowiardjo\",\"doi\":\"10.5114/wo.2025.149236\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Despite the rising application of radiotherapy for cancer in Indonesia, no known radiotherapy utilization rate (RUR) figure has been produced for colon and rectal cancer in Indonesia. This study aims to depict the actual and optimal RUR for colon and rectal cancer in Indonesia.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Secondary data was obtained from hospitals providing radiotherapy services in Indonesia, and descriptive analysis was conducted in April-September 2022.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Actual RUR (aRUR) of colon cancer was 5.3%, yet the calculated optimal RUR (oRUR) was 3.3% (3-3.7%) with an unmet need percentage of -60.6% [-76.7-(-43.2)%]. Actual RUR of rectal cancer in Indonesia was 19.5%, while calculated oRUR was 41% (28-66%) with an unmet need percentage of 52.4% (30.4-70.5%). In combination, 26.21% and 14.9% were the final calculation of colorectal cancer oRUR and aRUR, resulting in 45.5% (21.4-65.6%) unmet need. A substantial difference was also observed when sensitivity analysis was incorporated, with the percentage of unmet needs for colon and rectal cancer ranging from -76.7 to 86.5% and 2.2-94.2%, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>There is a gap between aRUR and oRUR of colorectal cancer. Although oRUR of colon cancer seems to have been met, a significant gap persisted between oRUR and aRUR in rectal cancer. However, when sensitivity analysis was incorporated, notable disparity persisted for both colon and rectal cancer. Patient, clinician, and bureaucratic factors should be considered in increasing the RUR of colon and rectal cancer.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49354,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Wspolczesna Onkologia-Contemporary Oncology\",\"volume\":\"29 1\",\"pages\":\"113-122\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12051874/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Wspolczesna Onkologia-Contemporary Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5114/wo.2025.149236\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/4/9 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Wspolczesna Onkologia-Contemporary Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5114/wo.2025.149236","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导论:尽管印度尼西亚癌症放疗的应用越来越多,但目前尚无已知的印度尼西亚结肠癌和直肠癌放疗利用率(RUR)数据。本研究旨在描述印度尼西亚结直肠癌的实际和最佳RUR。材料和方法:从印度尼西亚提供放疗服务的医院获得二级数据,并于2022年4月至9月进行描述性分析。结果:结肠癌实际RUR (aRUR)为5.3%,计算最佳RUR (oRUR)为3.3%(3-3.7%),未满足率为-60.6%[-76.7-(-43.2)%]。印度尼西亚直肠癌的实际RUR为19.5%,计算oRUR为41%(28-66%),未满足需求比例为52.4%(30.4-70.5%)。结直肠癌oRUR和aRUR的最终计算分别为26.21%和14.9%,有45.5%(21.4-65.6%)未满足需求。当纳入敏感性分析时,也观察到实质性差异,结肠癌和直肠癌未满足需求的百分比分别为- 76.7%至86.5%和2.2-94.2%。结论:结直肠癌的aRUR与oRUR存在差距。虽然结肠癌的oRUR似乎已经达到,但直肠癌的oRUR和aRUR之间仍然存在显著差距。然而,当纳入敏感性分析时,结肠癌和直肠癌的显著差异仍然存在。提高结直肠癌RUR应综合考虑患者、临床医师和官僚因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Colorectal cancer radiotherapy utilization rate in a low-middle income country - a multicenter study in Indonesia.

Introduction: Despite the rising application of radiotherapy for cancer in Indonesia, no known radiotherapy utilization rate (RUR) figure has been produced for colon and rectal cancer in Indonesia. This study aims to depict the actual and optimal RUR for colon and rectal cancer in Indonesia.

Material and methods: Secondary data was obtained from hospitals providing radiotherapy services in Indonesia, and descriptive analysis was conducted in April-September 2022.

Results: Actual RUR (aRUR) of colon cancer was 5.3%, yet the calculated optimal RUR (oRUR) was 3.3% (3-3.7%) with an unmet need percentage of -60.6% [-76.7-(-43.2)%]. Actual RUR of rectal cancer in Indonesia was 19.5%, while calculated oRUR was 41% (28-66%) with an unmet need percentage of 52.4% (30.4-70.5%). In combination, 26.21% and 14.9% were the final calculation of colorectal cancer oRUR and aRUR, resulting in 45.5% (21.4-65.6%) unmet need. A substantial difference was also observed when sensitivity analysis was incorporated, with the percentage of unmet needs for colon and rectal cancer ranging from -76.7 to 86.5% and 2.2-94.2%, respectively.

Conclusions: There is a gap between aRUR and oRUR of colorectal cancer. Although oRUR of colon cancer seems to have been met, a significant gap persisted between oRUR and aRUR in rectal cancer. However, when sensitivity analysis was incorporated, notable disparity persisted for both colon and rectal cancer. Patient, clinician, and bureaucratic factors should be considered in increasing the RUR of colon and rectal cancer.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
22
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Contemporary Oncology is a journal aimed at oncologists, oncological surgeons, hematologists, radiologists, pathologists, radiotherapists, palliative care specialists, psychologists, nutritionists, and representatives of any other professions, whose interests are related to cancer. Manuscripts devoted to basic research in the field of oncology are also welcomed.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信