远程保健在促进血癌护理公平方面的益处——多方利益攸关方论坛和叙述性审查的结果。

IF 3 4区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Journal of Medical Economics Pub Date : 2025-12-01 Epub Date: 2025-05-27 DOI:10.1080/13696998.2024.2438561
Joseph Mikhael, Deanna Darlington, Bethany Howell, Jay Hydren, Tricia Hernandez, Sally Werner, Tracey Iraca, Mary Arnett, Victor Gonzalez, Susan Peschin, Alan J Balch, Diane Moran, Roslyn Young-Daniels, Olamide Banjo, George Dennis Obeng, Benjamin Asiedu-Ayeh, Sampson Kawuo, Asmau Mohammed Tukur, Inusah Mohammed, Akosua Pokuaah Obeng, Marcell Csanádi, Thomas Lew, Mimi Choon-Quinones
{"title":"远程保健在促进血癌护理公平方面的益处——多方利益攸关方论坛和叙述性审查的结果。","authors":"Joseph Mikhael, Deanna Darlington, Bethany Howell, Jay Hydren, Tricia Hernandez, Sally Werner, Tracey Iraca, Mary Arnett, Victor Gonzalez, Susan Peschin, Alan J Balch, Diane Moran, Roslyn Young-Daniels, Olamide Banjo, George Dennis Obeng, Benjamin Asiedu-Ayeh, Sampson Kawuo, Asmau Mohammed Tukur, Inusah Mohammed, Akosua Pokuaah Obeng, Marcell Csanádi, Thomas Lew, Mimi Choon-Quinones","doi":"10.1080/13696998.2024.2438561","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>Therapeutic advancements have significantly improved patient outcomes in blood cancers. However, racial and ethnic disparities persist in treatment and access to care. Telehealth offers a promising solution to these disparities by using electronic and telecommunication technologies to deliver healthcare remotely. Ensuring access to telehealth depends not just on the technologies, but on the broader enabling environment, especially policy harmonization, communications infrastructure, and skills. This paper aims to advocate for the expanded use of telehealth in blood cancer management, highlighting its potential to improve equity and outcomes.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>An expert forum discussion results informed this systematic literature review which was performed to better understand the applied Telehealth solutions and the expected benefits. The forum discussion and the literature review findings were aggregated and reviewed by experts and patient advocates with personal experience in blood cancer.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our review of the literature yielded 18 relevant papers. Studies included patients from various disease areas; some studies used broader definitions of cancer to include more patients (i.e. acute leukemias and malignant lymphomas), while others were more specific to a particular condition. The identified Telehealth solutions were classified into two groups: solutions focusing on electronic consultation (<i>n</i> = 10) and solutions focusing on a specific intervention to improve patients' health status (<i>n</i> = 8). A larger variety of outcomes were found in these studies, including quality of life, patient and clinicians' acceptance, adherence, costs, and resource use.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Initial findings demonstrate that telehealth can potentially improve patient outcomes for people living with blood cancer, including improved patient quality of life, increased clinician acceptance, better adherence, and reduced costs and resource use to the health system. While evidence for virtual consultations show promising results, further research is needed due to the variety of study settings evaluated in this review. Providers and health systems need additional data on the positive economic impact of Telehealth related to the diagnostic journey and access to treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":16229,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Economics","volume":" ","pages":"788-802"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The benefits of telehealth in promoting equity in blood cancer care - results of a multi-stakeholder forum and systematic literature review.\",\"authors\":\"Joseph Mikhael, Deanna Darlington, Bethany Howell, Jay Hydren, Tricia Hernandez, Sally Werner, Tracey Iraca, Mary Arnett, Victor Gonzalez, Susan Peschin, Alan J Balch, Diane Moran, Roslyn Young-Daniels, Olamide Banjo, George Dennis Obeng, Benjamin Asiedu-Ayeh, Sampson Kawuo, Asmau Mohammed Tukur, Inusah Mohammed, Akosua Pokuaah Obeng, Marcell Csanádi, Thomas Lew, Mimi Choon-Quinones\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/13696998.2024.2438561\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>Therapeutic advancements have significantly improved patient outcomes in blood cancers. However, racial and ethnic disparities persist in treatment and access to care. Telehealth offers a promising solution to these disparities by using electronic and telecommunication technologies to deliver healthcare remotely. Ensuring access to telehealth depends not just on the technologies, but on the broader enabling environment, especially policy harmonization, communications infrastructure, and skills. This paper aims to advocate for the expanded use of telehealth in blood cancer management, highlighting its potential to improve equity and outcomes.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>An expert forum discussion results informed this systematic literature review which was performed to better understand the applied Telehealth solutions and the expected benefits. The forum discussion and the literature review findings were aggregated and reviewed by experts and patient advocates with personal experience in blood cancer.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our review of the literature yielded 18 relevant papers. Studies included patients from various disease areas; some studies used broader definitions of cancer to include more patients (i.e. acute leukemias and malignant lymphomas), while others were more specific to a particular condition. The identified Telehealth solutions were classified into two groups: solutions focusing on electronic consultation (<i>n</i> = 10) and solutions focusing on a specific intervention to improve patients' health status (<i>n</i> = 8). A larger variety of outcomes were found in these studies, including quality of life, patient and clinicians' acceptance, adherence, costs, and resource use.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Initial findings demonstrate that telehealth can potentially improve patient outcomes for people living with blood cancer, including improved patient quality of life, increased clinician acceptance, better adherence, and reduced costs and resource use to the health system. While evidence for virtual consultations show promising results, further research is needed due to the variety of study settings evaluated in this review. Providers and health systems need additional data on the positive economic impact of Telehealth related to the diagnostic journey and access to treatment.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16229,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Medical Economics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"788-802\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Medical Economics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/13696998.2024.2438561\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/5/27 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Medical Economics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13696998.2024.2438561","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/5/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

治疗的进步显著改善了血癌患者的预后。然而,在治疗和获得护理方面仍然存在明显的种族和民族差异。远程保健通过利用电子和电信技术远程提供保健服务,为这些差异提供了一个有希望的解决方案。确保获得远程保健不仅取决于技术,还取决于更广泛的有利环境,特别是政策协调、通信基础设施和技能。本文旨在倡导在血癌管理中扩大远程医疗的使用,强调其改善公平性和结果的潜力。材料和方法专家论坛讨论的结果为这次叙述性审查提供了信息,这次审查是为了更好地了解应用的远程保健解决方案和预期的效益。论坛讨论和文献综述的结果由主题专家和具有血癌个人经验的患者倡导者汇总和审查。结果我们检索到相关文献18篇。研究对象包括来自不同疾病领域的患者;一些研究使用了更广泛的癌症定义,以包括更多的患者(即急性白血病和恶性淋巴瘤),而另一些研究则更具体地针对特定的疾病。确定的远程医疗解决方案分为两组:侧重于电子咨询的解决方案(n = 10)和侧重于改善患者健康状况的特定干预的解决方案(n = 8)。在这些研究中发现了更多不同的结果,包括生活质量、患者和临床医生的接受程度、依从性、成本和资源使用。初步研究结果表明,远程医疗可以潜在地改善血癌患者的预后,包括改善患者的生活质量,增加临床医生的接受度,更好的依从性,降低卫生系统的成本和资源使用。虽然虚拟咨询的证据显示出有希望的结果,但由于本综述评估的研究环境多种多样,需要进一步的研究。提供者和卫生系统需要更多的数据,说明远程医疗在诊断过程和获得治疗方面的积极经济影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The benefits of telehealth in promoting equity in blood cancer care - results of a multi-stakeholder forum and systematic literature review.

Aims: Therapeutic advancements have significantly improved patient outcomes in blood cancers. However, racial and ethnic disparities persist in treatment and access to care. Telehealth offers a promising solution to these disparities by using electronic and telecommunication technologies to deliver healthcare remotely. Ensuring access to telehealth depends not just on the technologies, but on the broader enabling environment, especially policy harmonization, communications infrastructure, and skills. This paper aims to advocate for the expanded use of telehealth in blood cancer management, highlighting its potential to improve equity and outcomes.

Materials and methods: An expert forum discussion results informed this systematic literature review which was performed to better understand the applied Telehealth solutions and the expected benefits. The forum discussion and the literature review findings were aggregated and reviewed by experts and patient advocates with personal experience in blood cancer.

Results: Our review of the literature yielded 18 relevant papers. Studies included patients from various disease areas; some studies used broader definitions of cancer to include more patients (i.e. acute leukemias and malignant lymphomas), while others were more specific to a particular condition. The identified Telehealth solutions were classified into two groups: solutions focusing on electronic consultation (n = 10) and solutions focusing on a specific intervention to improve patients' health status (n = 8). A larger variety of outcomes were found in these studies, including quality of life, patient and clinicians' acceptance, adherence, costs, and resource use.

Conclusions: Initial findings demonstrate that telehealth can potentially improve patient outcomes for people living with blood cancer, including improved patient quality of life, increased clinician acceptance, better adherence, and reduced costs and resource use to the health system. While evidence for virtual consultations show promising results, further research is needed due to the variety of study settings evaluated in this review. Providers and health systems need additional data on the positive economic impact of Telehealth related to the diagnostic journey and access to treatment.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Medical Economics
Journal of Medical Economics HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
4.20%
发文量
122
期刊介绍: Journal of Medical Economics'' mission is to provide ethical, unbiased and rapid publication of quality content that is validated by rigorous peer review. The aim of Journal of Medical Economics is to serve the information needs of the pharmacoeconomics and healthcare research community, to help translate research advances into patient care and be a leader in transparency/disclosure by facilitating a collaborative and honest approach to publication. Journal of Medical Economics publishes high-quality economic assessments of novel therapeutic and device interventions for an international audience
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信