不同限制血流训练方案结合低强度训练对老年人肌肉力量和心血管安全性的影响:系统综述和网络荟萃分析

IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q2 PHYSIOLOGY
Frontiers in Physiology Pub Date : 2025-04-28 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fphys.2025.1587876
Meiling Ren, Guangshen Xian, Xiangchao Tan, Shaocheng Sun, Ming Zhang
{"title":"不同限制血流训练方案结合低强度训练对老年人肌肉力量和心血管安全性的影响:系统综述和网络荟萃分析","authors":"Meiling Ren, Guangshen Xian, Xiangchao Tan, Shaocheng Sun, Ming Zhang","doi":"10.3389/fphys.2025.1587876","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Older adults are experiencing a gradual decline in physical function as they age. Previous studies have shown that blood flow restriction (BFR) combined with low-intensity training can improve muscle strength and maintain cardiovascular fitness in older adults. However, it remains unclear which training regimen is the most effective. This study aims to investigate the effects of different BFR regimens combined with low-intensity training on muscle strength and cardiovascular safety in older adults.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, the Cochrane Library, Scopus, EBSCOhost, and CNKI were searched up to March 2025 to select eligible studies. The randomized controlled trials that explored the effects of BFR training on muscle strength and cardiovascular safety in older adults were included.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 18 studies with 626 participants were included. The results of this network meta-analysis showed that: 1) in terms of improving muscle strength: compared to the controls, low-frequency, low-pressure, and low-intensity BFR training regimen was significantly related to one-repetition maximum (1RM) strength [weighted mean difference (WMD) = 0.58, 95% CI: 0.81-1.08 <i>P</i> < 0.05]. Moreover, high-frequency, high-pressure, and low-intensity BFR training was associated with increased muscle cross-sectional area [WMD = 0.50,95% CI (-0.10,1.11), <i>P</i> > 0.05] and isometric muscle strength [WMD = 1.44,95% CI (0.75,2.12), <i>P</i> < 0.05]; 2) in terms of cardiovascular health: compared to the controls, BFR training regimens at different pressures and frequencies were not linked to changes in heart rate in older adults (<i>P</i> > 0.05). Moreover, low-frequency, low-pressure, and low-intensity BFR training regimen was associated with increased systolic blood pressure [WMD = 3.40, 95%CI (0.61,6.19), <i>P</i> < 0.05] and diastolic blood pressure [WMD = 13.40, 95%CI (8.96,17.84), <i>P</i> < 0.05] in older adults.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Based on the results, high-frequency, high-pressure, and low-intensity BFR training may serve as the optimal regimen to improve muscle strength and maintain cardiovascular fitness in older adults. <b>Clinical Trial Registration:</b> https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/, <b>Registration</b> and protocol CRD42024534387.</p>","PeriodicalId":12477,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Physiology","volume":"16 ","pages":"1587876"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12066469/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of different blood flow restriction training regimens combined with low-intensity training on muscle strength and cardiovascular safety in older adults: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Meiling Ren, Guangshen Xian, Xiangchao Tan, Shaocheng Sun, Ming Zhang\",\"doi\":\"10.3389/fphys.2025.1587876\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Older adults are experiencing a gradual decline in physical function as they age. Previous studies have shown that blood flow restriction (BFR) combined with low-intensity training can improve muscle strength and maintain cardiovascular fitness in older adults. However, it remains unclear which training regimen is the most effective. This study aims to investigate the effects of different BFR regimens combined with low-intensity training on muscle strength and cardiovascular safety in older adults.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, the Cochrane Library, Scopus, EBSCOhost, and CNKI were searched up to March 2025 to select eligible studies. The randomized controlled trials that explored the effects of BFR training on muscle strength and cardiovascular safety in older adults were included.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 18 studies with 626 participants were included. The results of this network meta-analysis showed that: 1) in terms of improving muscle strength: compared to the controls, low-frequency, low-pressure, and low-intensity BFR training regimen was significantly related to one-repetition maximum (1RM) strength [weighted mean difference (WMD) = 0.58, 95% CI: 0.81-1.08 <i>P</i> < 0.05]. Moreover, high-frequency, high-pressure, and low-intensity BFR training was associated with increased muscle cross-sectional area [WMD = 0.50,95% CI (-0.10,1.11), <i>P</i> > 0.05] and isometric muscle strength [WMD = 1.44,95% CI (0.75,2.12), <i>P</i> < 0.05]; 2) in terms of cardiovascular health: compared to the controls, BFR training regimens at different pressures and frequencies were not linked to changes in heart rate in older adults (<i>P</i> > 0.05). Moreover, low-frequency, low-pressure, and low-intensity BFR training regimen was associated with increased systolic blood pressure [WMD = 3.40, 95%CI (0.61,6.19), <i>P</i> < 0.05] and diastolic blood pressure [WMD = 13.40, 95%CI (8.96,17.84), <i>P</i> < 0.05] in older adults.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Based on the results, high-frequency, high-pressure, and low-intensity BFR training may serve as the optimal regimen to improve muscle strength and maintain cardiovascular fitness in older adults. <b>Clinical Trial Registration:</b> https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/, <b>Registration</b> and protocol CRD42024534387.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12477,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Frontiers in Physiology\",\"volume\":\"16 \",\"pages\":\"1587876\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12066469/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Frontiers in Physiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2025.1587876\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PHYSIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Physiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2025.1587876","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHYSIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:随着年龄的增长,老年人的身体机能逐渐下降。先前的研究表明,限制血流量(BFR)与低强度训练相结合,可以提高老年人的肌肉力量,保持心血管健康。然而,目前尚不清楚哪种训练方案最有效。本研究旨在探讨不同BFR方案结合低强度训练对老年人肌肉力量和心血管安全性的影响。方法:检索截至2025年3月的PubMed、Web of Science、Embase、Cochrane Library、Scopus、EBSCOhost、CNKI等数据库,选择符合条件的研究。其中包括探讨BFR训练对老年人肌肉力量和心血管安全性影响的随机对照试验。结果:共纳入18项研究,626名受试者。本网络meta分析结果显示:1)在提高肌力方面:与对照组相比,低频、低压、低强度的BFR训练方案与单次重复最大肌力(1RM)显著相关[加权平均差(WMD) = 0.58, 95% CI: 0.81-1.08 P < 0.05]。此外,高频、高压和低强度BFR训练与肌肉横截面积(WMD = 0.50,95% CI (-0.10,1.11), P < 0.05)和等长肌力(WMD = 1.44,95% CI (0.75,2.12), P < 0.05)增加相关;2)在心血管健康方面:与对照组相比,不同压力和频率的BFR训练方案与老年人心率变化无关(P < 0.05)。此外,低频、低压、低强度BFR训练方案与老年人收缩压升高[WMD = 3.40, 95%CI (0.61,6.19), P < 0.05]和舒张压升高[WMD = 13.40, 95%CI (8.96,17.84), P < 0.05]相关。结论:基于上述结果,高频、高压、低强度的BFR训练可能是老年人提高肌力和维持心血管健康的最佳方案。临床试验注册:https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/,注册方案CRD42024534387。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effect of different blood flow restriction training regimens combined with low-intensity training on muscle strength and cardiovascular safety in older adults: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.

Background: Older adults are experiencing a gradual decline in physical function as they age. Previous studies have shown that blood flow restriction (BFR) combined with low-intensity training can improve muscle strength and maintain cardiovascular fitness in older adults. However, it remains unclear which training regimen is the most effective. This study aims to investigate the effects of different BFR regimens combined with low-intensity training on muscle strength and cardiovascular safety in older adults.

Method: PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, the Cochrane Library, Scopus, EBSCOhost, and CNKI were searched up to March 2025 to select eligible studies. The randomized controlled trials that explored the effects of BFR training on muscle strength and cardiovascular safety in older adults were included.

Results: A total of 18 studies with 626 participants were included. The results of this network meta-analysis showed that: 1) in terms of improving muscle strength: compared to the controls, low-frequency, low-pressure, and low-intensity BFR training regimen was significantly related to one-repetition maximum (1RM) strength [weighted mean difference (WMD) = 0.58, 95% CI: 0.81-1.08 P < 0.05]. Moreover, high-frequency, high-pressure, and low-intensity BFR training was associated with increased muscle cross-sectional area [WMD = 0.50,95% CI (-0.10,1.11), P > 0.05] and isometric muscle strength [WMD = 1.44,95% CI (0.75,2.12), P < 0.05]; 2) in terms of cardiovascular health: compared to the controls, BFR training regimens at different pressures and frequencies were not linked to changes in heart rate in older adults (P > 0.05). Moreover, low-frequency, low-pressure, and low-intensity BFR training regimen was associated with increased systolic blood pressure [WMD = 3.40, 95%CI (0.61,6.19), P < 0.05] and diastolic blood pressure [WMD = 13.40, 95%CI (8.96,17.84), P < 0.05] in older adults.

Conclusion: Based on the results, high-frequency, high-pressure, and low-intensity BFR training may serve as the optimal regimen to improve muscle strength and maintain cardiovascular fitness in older adults. Clinical Trial Registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/, Registration and protocol CRD42024534387.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
5.00%
发文量
2608
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊介绍: Frontiers in Physiology is a leading journal in its field, publishing rigorously peer-reviewed research on the physiology of living systems, from the subcellular and molecular domains to the intact organism, and its interaction with the environment. Field Chief Editor George E. Billman at the Ohio State University Columbus is supported by an outstanding Editorial Board of international researchers. This multidisciplinary open-access journal is at the forefront of disseminating and communicating scientific knowledge and impactful discoveries to researchers, academics, clinicians and the public worldwide.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信