Sean Gaine, Thomas Rolland, Babken Asatryan, Mikael Laredo, James Sampognaro, Richard T Carrick, Giovanni Peretto, Steven Muller, Andrea Villatore, Brittney Murray, Crystal Tichnell, Anneline S J M Te Riele, Peter Loh, Paolo Compagnucci, Michela Casella, Marika Martini, Marco Schiavone, Claudio Tondo, Chiara Cappelletto, Gianfranco Sinagra, Marco Merlo, Lior Jankelson, Mario Delmar, Mattia Targetti, Maurizio Pieroni, Iacopo Olivotto, Leonardo Calò, Maddalena Graziosi, Elena Biagini, Harikrishna Tandri, Barbara Bauce, Cynthia James, Marina Cerrone, Hugh Calkins, Estelle Gandjbakhch, Alessio Gasperetti
{"title":"在致心律失常右室心肌病中使用氟卡因胺抗心律失常的长期随访数据:一项多中心研究。","authors":"Sean Gaine, Thomas Rolland, Babken Asatryan, Mikael Laredo, James Sampognaro, Richard T Carrick, Giovanni Peretto, Steven Muller, Andrea Villatore, Brittney Murray, Crystal Tichnell, Anneline S J M Te Riele, Peter Loh, Paolo Compagnucci, Michela Casella, Marika Martini, Marco Schiavone, Claudio Tondo, Chiara Cappelletto, Gianfranco Sinagra, Marco Merlo, Lior Jankelson, Mario Delmar, Mattia Targetti, Maurizio Pieroni, Iacopo Olivotto, Leonardo Calò, Maddalena Graziosi, Elena Biagini, Harikrishna Tandri, Barbara Bauce, Cynthia James, Marina Cerrone, Hugh Calkins, Estelle Gandjbakhch, Alessio Gasperetti","doi":"10.1016/j.jacep.2025.02.023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy (ARVC) is an inherited cardiomyopathy associated with a high risk of ventricular arrhythmia (VA). Several animal models have been used to postulate a therapeutic role of the inhibition of the ryanodine 2 receptor via the use of flecainide for this disease. Clinical data describing its use are scarce, however, especially in patients without implantable cardioverter-defibrillators or with left ventricular (LV) involvement.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study sought to report safety and effectiveness long-term, multicenter data on the impact of flecainide therapy on arrhythmic outcomes in patients with a definite diagnosis of ARVC.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients with definite ARVC receiving flecainide at 12 academic institutions were enrolled in the study. Baseline was defined as the time of flecainide initiation. Premature ventricular complex burdens, nonsustained ventricular tachycardia (NSVT) rates, and sustained VA yearly/rates were collected and compared while on and off flecainide. Side effects and flecainide discontinuation were tracked. Analyses were performed in the overall cohort as well as stratifying for genotype (gene positive vs negative; plakohpillin-2 [PKP-2] vs non PKP-2) and for LV involvement.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 191 patients (37.9 ± 13.7 years; 69.0% male; 89.0% probands; 59.2% having implantable cardioverter-defibrillators; 33.0% with prior VA; 43.5% PKP-2<sup>+</sup>; LV ejection fraction 55.9 ± 7.3%; right ventricular ejection fraction 44.5 ± 10.5% at baseline) were enrolled, with 66 patients (34.6%) showing LV involvement. The median dose of flecainide was 200 mg/d [150-200 mg/d], with 166 patients (86.9%) also taking a beta-blocker. The median follow-up time on flecainide was 4.2 years [1.9-6.3 years]. Flecainide was well tolerated, with a low (7.9%) discontinuation rate. After flecainide initiation, a significant reduction in the 24-hour premature ventricular complex burden and in the rate of nonsustained ventricular tachycardia was observed (2,190 vs 418; P < 0.001; 35.1% vs 21.5%; P = 0.003). For patients with prior VA events, a significant reduction in the amount of VA episodes/y (1.1 [0.4-1.6] episodes/y vs 0 [0-0.3] episodes/y; P < 0.001) was observed. These safety and effectiveness findings were consistent across genotype subgroups, as well as in patients with and without LV involvement.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Flecainide use had a favorable safety profile and was associated with an observed to a significant reduction in arrhythmic burden in patients with ARVC, irrespective of the underlying genotype or LV involvement.</p>","PeriodicalId":14573,"journal":{"name":"JACC. Clinical electrophysiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Long-Term Follow-Up Data on Flecainide Use as an Antiarrhythmic in Arrhythmogenic Right Ventricular Cardiomyopathy: A Multicenter Study.\",\"authors\":\"Sean Gaine, Thomas Rolland, Babken Asatryan, Mikael Laredo, James Sampognaro, Richard T Carrick, Giovanni Peretto, Steven Muller, Andrea Villatore, Brittney Murray, Crystal Tichnell, Anneline S J M Te Riele, Peter Loh, Paolo Compagnucci, Michela Casella, Marika Martini, Marco Schiavone, Claudio Tondo, Chiara Cappelletto, Gianfranco Sinagra, Marco Merlo, Lior Jankelson, Mario Delmar, Mattia Targetti, Maurizio Pieroni, Iacopo Olivotto, Leonardo Calò, Maddalena Graziosi, Elena Biagini, Harikrishna Tandri, Barbara Bauce, Cynthia James, Marina Cerrone, Hugh Calkins, Estelle Gandjbakhch, Alessio Gasperetti\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jacep.2025.02.023\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy (ARVC) is an inherited cardiomyopathy associated with a high risk of ventricular arrhythmia (VA). Several animal models have been used to postulate a therapeutic role of the inhibition of the ryanodine 2 receptor via the use of flecainide for this disease. Clinical data describing its use are scarce, however, especially in patients without implantable cardioverter-defibrillators or with left ventricular (LV) involvement.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study sought to report safety and effectiveness long-term, multicenter data on the impact of flecainide therapy on arrhythmic outcomes in patients with a definite diagnosis of ARVC.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients with definite ARVC receiving flecainide at 12 academic institutions were enrolled in the study. Baseline was defined as the time of flecainide initiation. Premature ventricular complex burdens, nonsustained ventricular tachycardia (NSVT) rates, and sustained VA yearly/rates were collected and compared while on and off flecainide. Side effects and flecainide discontinuation were tracked. Analyses were performed in the overall cohort as well as stratifying for genotype (gene positive vs negative; plakohpillin-2 [PKP-2] vs non PKP-2) and for LV involvement.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 191 patients (37.9 ± 13.7 years; 69.0% male; 89.0% probands; 59.2% having implantable cardioverter-defibrillators; 33.0% with prior VA; 43.5% PKP-2<sup>+</sup>; LV ejection fraction 55.9 ± 7.3%; right ventricular ejection fraction 44.5 ± 10.5% at baseline) were enrolled, with 66 patients (34.6%) showing LV involvement. The median dose of flecainide was 200 mg/d [150-200 mg/d], with 166 patients (86.9%) also taking a beta-blocker. The median follow-up time on flecainide was 4.2 years [1.9-6.3 years]. Flecainide was well tolerated, with a low (7.9%) discontinuation rate. After flecainide initiation, a significant reduction in the 24-hour premature ventricular complex burden and in the rate of nonsustained ventricular tachycardia was observed (2,190 vs 418; P < 0.001; 35.1% vs 21.5%; P = 0.003). For patients with prior VA events, a significant reduction in the amount of VA episodes/y (1.1 [0.4-1.6] episodes/y vs 0 [0-0.3] episodes/y; P < 0.001) was observed. These safety and effectiveness findings were consistent across genotype subgroups, as well as in patients with and without LV involvement.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Flecainide use had a favorable safety profile and was associated with an observed to a significant reduction in arrhythmic burden in patients with ARVC, irrespective of the underlying genotype or LV involvement.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14573,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JACC. Clinical electrophysiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":8.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JACC. Clinical electrophysiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacep.2025.02.023\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JACC. Clinical electrophysiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacep.2025.02.023","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:心律失常性右室心肌病(ARVC)是一种与室性心律失常(VA)高风险相关的遗传性心肌病。一些动物模型已经被用来假设通过使用氟化胺来抑制ryanodine 2受体的治疗作用。然而,描述其使用的临床数据很少,特别是在没有植入式心律转复除颤器或左心室受累的患者中。目的:本研究旨在报告氟氯胺治疗对确诊ARVC患者心律失常结局影响的长期、多中心数据的安全性和有效性。方法:在12个学术机构接受氟氯胺治疗的确诊ARVC患者纳入研究。基线定义为氟氯胺起始时间。收集和比较使用和不使用氟氯胺时室性早衰、非持续性室性心动过速(NSVT)率和持续室性心动过速年/年率。对副作用和氟氯胺停药情况进行了跟踪。对整个队列进行了分析,并对基因型进行了分层(基因阳性与阴性;plakohpillin-2 [PKP-2]与非PKP-2)和左室累及。结果:共191例患者(37.9±13.7年;男性69.0%;89.0%的渊源者;59.2%的患者有植入式心律转复除颤器;33.0%有VA病史;PKP-2 + 43.5%;左室射血分数55.9±7.3%;右心室射血分数(基线时为44.5±10.5%)入组,66例(34.6%)患者表现为左室受累。氟卡奈的中位剂量为200 mg/d [150-200 mg/d], 166例(86.9%)患者同时服用β受体阻滞剂。氟氯胺的中位随访时间为4.2年[1.9-6.3年]。Flecainide耐受性良好,停药率低(7.9%)。在氟卡奈起始治疗后,观察到24小时室性过早复杂负荷和非持续性室性心动过速的发生率显著降低(2190 vs 418;P < 0.001;35.1% vs 21.5%;p = 0.003)。对于既往有VA事件的患者,VA发作次数/y显著降低(1.1[0.4-1.6]次/y vs 0[0-0.3]次/y;P < 0.001)。这些安全性和有效性的发现在基因型亚组以及有和没有左室累及的患者中是一致的。结论:使用氟氯胺具有良好的安全性,并且与观察到的ARVC患者心律失常负担的显著减少相关,无论潜在的基因型或左室累及程度如何。
Long-Term Follow-Up Data on Flecainide Use as an Antiarrhythmic in Arrhythmogenic Right Ventricular Cardiomyopathy: A Multicenter Study.
Background: Arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy (ARVC) is an inherited cardiomyopathy associated with a high risk of ventricular arrhythmia (VA). Several animal models have been used to postulate a therapeutic role of the inhibition of the ryanodine 2 receptor via the use of flecainide for this disease. Clinical data describing its use are scarce, however, especially in patients without implantable cardioverter-defibrillators or with left ventricular (LV) involvement.
Objectives: This study sought to report safety and effectiveness long-term, multicenter data on the impact of flecainide therapy on arrhythmic outcomes in patients with a definite diagnosis of ARVC.
Methods: Patients with definite ARVC receiving flecainide at 12 academic institutions were enrolled in the study. Baseline was defined as the time of flecainide initiation. Premature ventricular complex burdens, nonsustained ventricular tachycardia (NSVT) rates, and sustained VA yearly/rates were collected and compared while on and off flecainide. Side effects and flecainide discontinuation were tracked. Analyses were performed in the overall cohort as well as stratifying for genotype (gene positive vs negative; plakohpillin-2 [PKP-2] vs non PKP-2) and for LV involvement.
Results: A total of 191 patients (37.9 ± 13.7 years; 69.0% male; 89.0% probands; 59.2% having implantable cardioverter-defibrillators; 33.0% with prior VA; 43.5% PKP-2+; LV ejection fraction 55.9 ± 7.3%; right ventricular ejection fraction 44.5 ± 10.5% at baseline) were enrolled, with 66 patients (34.6%) showing LV involvement. The median dose of flecainide was 200 mg/d [150-200 mg/d], with 166 patients (86.9%) also taking a beta-blocker. The median follow-up time on flecainide was 4.2 years [1.9-6.3 years]. Flecainide was well tolerated, with a low (7.9%) discontinuation rate. After flecainide initiation, a significant reduction in the 24-hour premature ventricular complex burden and in the rate of nonsustained ventricular tachycardia was observed (2,190 vs 418; P < 0.001; 35.1% vs 21.5%; P = 0.003). For patients with prior VA events, a significant reduction in the amount of VA episodes/y (1.1 [0.4-1.6] episodes/y vs 0 [0-0.3] episodes/y; P < 0.001) was observed. These safety and effectiveness findings were consistent across genotype subgroups, as well as in patients with and without LV involvement.
Conclusions: Flecainide use had a favorable safety profile and was associated with an observed to a significant reduction in arrhythmic burden in patients with ARVC, irrespective of the underlying genotype or LV involvement.
期刊介绍:
JACC: Clinical Electrophysiology is one of a family of specialist journals launched by the renowned Journal of the American College of Cardiology (JACC). It encompasses all aspects of the epidemiology, pathogenesis, diagnosis and treatment of cardiac arrhythmias. Submissions of original research and state-of-the-art reviews from cardiology, cardiovascular surgery, neurology, outcomes research, and related fields are encouraged. Experimental and preclinical work that directly relates to diagnostic or therapeutic interventions are also encouraged. In general, case reports will not be considered for publication.