护士在基因组护理量表上的表现:希腊克里特岛的横断面研究。

IF 2.4 Q1 NURSING
Konstantinos Giakoumidakis, Antonios Christodoulakis, Elisavet Petrogianni, Aggelos Laliotis, Alexandra Trivli, Evridiki Patelarou, Athina Patelarou
{"title":"护士在基因组护理量表上的表现:希腊克里特岛的横断面研究。","authors":"Konstantinos Giakoumidakis, Antonios Christodoulakis, Elisavet Petrogianni, Aggelos Laliotis, Alexandra Trivli, Evridiki Patelarou, Athina Patelarou","doi":"10.3390/nursrep15040121","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background/Objectives:</b> Genomics plays a crucial role in healthcare, enhancing diagnostics, risk assessments, and therapeutic interventions. However, many healthcare professionals, including nurses, face challenges when it comes to integrating genomics into their practice. This study aims to evaluate the genomic knowledge of nurse practitioners in Greece by translating and validating the Genomic Nursing Concept Inventory (GNCI). <b>Methods:</b> A cross-sectional study involving 324 nurses was conducted in Crete, Greece. The GNCI, a 31-item questionnaire, was translated and validated for the Greek context to assess nurses' genomics competence. <b>Results:</b> The Greek version of the GNCI demonstrated acceptable reliability (Cronbach's alpha = 0.622). The confirmatory factor analysis indicated a satisfactory fit for the one-factor model. However, the mean GNCI score revealed significant knowledge gaps, with nurses answering only 30.1% of questions correctly. Notably, nurses showed a better understanding of genomic basics and mutations compared to inheritance and genomic healthcare applications. <b>Conclusions:</b> The present study successfully translated and validated the GNCI in Greek and highlighted important genomic-related knowledge gaps among Greek nurses, emphasizing the urgent need for more targeted educational interventions. By enhancing genomic literacy through curriculum integration and professional development, nurses could be better prepared, leading to improved patient care and healthcare outcomes in Greece.</p>","PeriodicalId":40753,"journal":{"name":"Nursing Reports","volume":"15 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12029944/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Nurses' Performance on the Genomic Nursing Inventory: A Cross-Sectional Study in Crete, Greece.\",\"authors\":\"Konstantinos Giakoumidakis, Antonios Christodoulakis, Elisavet Petrogianni, Aggelos Laliotis, Alexandra Trivli, Evridiki Patelarou, Athina Patelarou\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/nursrep15040121\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Background/Objectives:</b> Genomics plays a crucial role in healthcare, enhancing diagnostics, risk assessments, and therapeutic interventions. However, many healthcare professionals, including nurses, face challenges when it comes to integrating genomics into their practice. This study aims to evaluate the genomic knowledge of nurse practitioners in Greece by translating and validating the Genomic Nursing Concept Inventory (GNCI). <b>Methods:</b> A cross-sectional study involving 324 nurses was conducted in Crete, Greece. The GNCI, a 31-item questionnaire, was translated and validated for the Greek context to assess nurses' genomics competence. <b>Results:</b> The Greek version of the GNCI demonstrated acceptable reliability (Cronbach's alpha = 0.622). The confirmatory factor analysis indicated a satisfactory fit for the one-factor model. However, the mean GNCI score revealed significant knowledge gaps, with nurses answering only 30.1% of questions correctly. Notably, nurses showed a better understanding of genomic basics and mutations compared to inheritance and genomic healthcare applications. <b>Conclusions:</b> The present study successfully translated and validated the GNCI in Greek and highlighted important genomic-related knowledge gaps among Greek nurses, emphasizing the urgent need for more targeted educational interventions. By enhancing genomic literacy through curriculum integration and professional development, nurses could be better prepared, leading to improved patient care and healthcare outcomes in Greece.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":40753,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nursing Reports\",\"volume\":\"15 4\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12029944/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nursing Reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/nursrep15040121\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nursing Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/nursrep15040121","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景/目的:基因组学在医疗保健、加强诊断、风险评估和治疗干预方面发挥着至关重要的作用。然而,许多医疗保健专业人员,包括护士,在将基因组学整合到他们的实践中时面临着挑战。本研究旨在通过翻译和验证基因组护理概念清单(GNCI)来评估希腊护士从业人员的基因组知识。方法:对希腊克里特岛324名护士进行横断面研究。GNCI是一份包含31个项目的问卷,针对希腊背景进行了翻译和验证,以评估护士的基因组学能力。结果:希腊版本的GNCI具有可接受的信度(Cronbach’s alpha = 0.622)。验证性因子分析表明,单因素模型拟合满意。然而,GNCI平均得分显示了显著的知识差距,护士仅正确回答了30.1%的问题。值得注意的是,与遗传和基因组保健应用相比,护士对基因组基础知识和突变有更好的理解。结论:本研究成功地翻译并验证了希腊GNCI,并突出了希腊护士基因组相关知识的重要差距,强调了迫切需要更有针对性的教育干预。通过课程整合和专业发展来提高基因组知识,护士可以做好更好的准备,从而改善希腊的患者护理和医疗保健结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Nurses' Performance on the Genomic Nursing Inventory: A Cross-Sectional Study in Crete, Greece.

Background/Objectives: Genomics plays a crucial role in healthcare, enhancing diagnostics, risk assessments, and therapeutic interventions. However, many healthcare professionals, including nurses, face challenges when it comes to integrating genomics into their practice. This study aims to evaluate the genomic knowledge of nurse practitioners in Greece by translating and validating the Genomic Nursing Concept Inventory (GNCI). Methods: A cross-sectional study involving 324 nurses was conducted in Crete, Greece. The GNCI, a 31-item questionnaire, was translated and validated for the Greek context to assess nurses' genomics competence. Results: The Greek version of the GNCI demonstrated acceptable reliability (Cronbach's alpha = 0.622). The confirmatory factor analysis indicated a satisfactory fit for the one-factor model. However, the mean GNCI score revealed significant knowledge gaps, with nurses answering only 30.1% of questions correctly. Notably, nurses showed a better understanding of genomic basics and mutations compared to inheritance and genomic healthcare applications. Conclusions: The present study successfully translated and validated the GNCI in Greek and highlighted important genomic-related knowledge gaps among Greek nurses, emphasizing the urgent need for more targeted educational interventions. By enhancing genomic literacy through curriculum integration and professional development, nurses could be better prepared, leading to improved patient care and healthcare outcomes in Greece.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Nursing Reports
Nursing Reports NURSING-
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
4.20%
发文量
78
期刊介绍: Nursing Reports is an open access, peer-reviewed, online-only journal that aims to influence the art and science of nursing by making rigorously conducted research accessible and understood to the full spectrum of practicing nurses, academics, educators and interested members of the public. The journal represents an exhilarating opportunity to make a unique and significant contribution to nursing and the wider community by addressing topics, theories and issues that concern the whole field of Nursing Science, including research, practice, policy and education. The primary intent of the journal is to present scientifically sound and influential empirical and theoretical studies, critical reviews and open debates to the global community of nurses. Short reports, opinions and insight into the plight of nurses the world-over will provide a voice for those of all cultures, governments and perspectives. The emphasis of Nursing Reports will be on ensuring that the highest quality of evidence and contribution is made available to the greatest number of nurses. Nursing Reports aims to make original, evidence-based, peer-reviewed research available to the global community of nurses and to interested members of the public. In addition, reviews of the literature, open debates on professional issues and short reports from around the world are invited to contribute to our vibrant and dynamic journal. All published work will adhere to the most stringent ethical standards and journalistic principles of fairness, worth and credibility. Our journal publishes Editorials, Original Articles, Review articles, Critical Debates, Short Reports from Around the Globe and Letters to the Editor.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信