海报部分:光视、中视和暗视的对比极性。

IF 2.3 4区 心理学 Q2 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Lisa Widmayer, Alexander C Schütz
{"title":"海报部分:光视、中视和暗视的对比极性。","authors":"Lisa Widmayer, Alexander C Schütz","doi":"10.1167/jov.25.5.47","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The perception of dark and light shows considerable asymmetries. In scotopic vision, \"white\" patches appear gray - brightness perception is clipped at the upper end of the range. In photopic vision, darks are perceived as relatively more intense than lights. Here, we compared perception of contrast polarities in photopic, mesopic, and scotopic viewing. We tested the perception of positive and negative contrasts in the three viewing conditions, using a circular stimulus (2° radius) presented for 200 ms at 8° eccentricity. In a detection task, we obtained absolute thresholds for positive and negative contrasts. In a matching task, we obtained PSEs when participants compared stimuli with positive and negative contrasts at three contrast levels (0.2, 0.35, 0.5). Stimuli were defined in Weber's contrast. In the detection task, thresholds were highest in scotopic and lowest in photopic vision. Thresholds were higher for positive than negative contrasts in mesopic and scotopic but not in photopic viewing. In the matching task, the asymmetry was increased in scotopic compared to photopic viewing, such that even more positive contrast was required to match negative contrasts. Our results show that the asymmetry in contrast perception depends on the lighting condition, being largest in scotopic vision in both tasks. As signals from cone receptors are crucial for perceiving \"white\", the clipped range in scotopic vision also seems to impede the perception of positive contrasts.</p>","PeriodicalId":49955,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Vision","volume":"25 5","pages":"47"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Poster Session: Contrast polarity in photopic, mesopic, and scotopic vision.\",\"authors\":\"Lisa Widmayer, Alexander C Schütz\",\"doi\":\"10.1167/jov.25.5.47\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The perception of dark and light shows considerable asymmetries. In scotopic vision, \\\"white\\\" patches appear gray - brightness perception is clipped at the upper end of the range. In photopic vision, darks are perceived as relatively more intense than lights. Here, we compared perception of contrast polarities in photopic, mesopic, and scotopic viewing. We tested the perception of positive and negative contrasts in the three viewing conditions, using a circular stimulus (2° radius) presented for 200 ms at 8° eccentricity. In a detection task, we obtained absolute thresholds for positive and negative contrasts. In a matching task, we obtained PSEs when participants compared stimuli with positive and negative contrasts at three contrast levels (0.2, 0.35, 0.5). Stimuli were defined in Weber's contrast. In the detection task, thresholds were highest in scotopic and lowest in photopic vision. Thresholds were higher for positive than negative contrasts in mesopic and scotopic but not in photopic viewing. In the matching task, the asymmetry was increased in scotopic compared to photopic viewing, such that even more positive contrast was required to match negative contrasts. Our results show that the asymmetry in contrast perception depends on the lighting condition, being largest in scotopic vision in both tasks. As signals from cone receptors are crucial for perceiving \\\"white\\\", the clipped range in scotopic vision also seems to impede the perception of positive contrasts.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49955,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Vision\",\"volume\":\"25 5\",\"pages\":\"47\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Vision\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1167/jov.25.5.47\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"OPHTHALMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Vision","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1167/jov.25.5.47","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

对黑暗和光明的感知显示出相当大的不对称性。在暗位视觉中,“白色”斑块出现灰色-亮度感知在范围的上端被截断。在感光视觉中,黑暗被认为比光更强烈。在这里,我们比较了光观、中观和暗观的对比极性感知。我们测试了在三种观看条件下的积极和消极对比的感知,使用一个圆形刺激(2°半径),以8°偏心呈现200毫秒。在一个检测任务中,我们获得了正对比和负对比的绝对阈值。在匹配任务中,当参与者在三个对比度水平(0.2,0.35,0.5)下比较正、负对比刺激时,我们获得了pse。刺激是在韦伯的对比中定义的。在检测任务中,暗视阈值最高,光视阈值最低。中暗观阳性阈值高于阴性阈值,但光观阴性阈值不高。在匹配任务中,暗视比光视的不对称性增加,因此需要更多的正对比来匹配负对比。我们的研究结果表明,对比感知的不对称性取决于光照条件,在两种任务中,暗视视觉的不对称性最大。由于来自锥体受体的信号对于感知“白色”至关重要,暗视的范围缩短似乎也阻碍了对正对比的感知。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Poster Session: Contrast polarity in photopic, mesopic, and scotopic vision.

The perception of dark and light shows considerable asymmetries. In scotopic vision, "white" patches appear gray - brightness perception is clipped at the upper end of the range. In photopic vision, darks are perceived as relatively more intense than lights. Here, we compared perception of contrast polarities in photopic, mesopic, and scotopic viewing. We tested the perception of positive and negative contrasts in the three viewing conditions, using a circular stimulus (2° radius) presented for 200 ms at 8° eccentricity. In a detection task, we obtained absolute thresholds for positive and negative contrasts. In a matching task, we obtained PSEs when participants compared stimuli with positive and negative contrasts at three contrast levels (0.2, 0.35, 0.5). Stimuli were defined in Weber's contrast. In the detection task, thresholds were highest in scotopic and lowest in photopic vision. Thresholds were higher for positive than negative contrasts in mesopic and scotopic but not in photopic viewing. In the matching task, the asymmetry was increased in scotopic compared to photopic viewing, such that even more positive contrast was required to match negative contrasts. Our results show that the asymmetry in contrast perception depends on the lighting condition, being largest in scotopic vision in both tasks. As signals from cone receptors are crucial for perceiving "white", the clipped range in scotopic vision also seems to impede the perception of positive contrasts.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Vision
Journal of Vision 医学-眼科学
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
5.60%
发文量
218
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Exploring all aspects of biological visual function, including spatial vision, perception, low vision, color vision and more, spanning the fields of neuroscience, psychology and psychophysics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信