开发MyCancerGene数字健康门户,以提高患者对生殖系癌症基因检测结果的理解:开发,用户和可用性测试研究。

IF 2 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Phillip Trieu, Dominique Fetzer, Briana McLeod, Kathryn Schweickert, Lauren Gutstein, Brian Egleston, Susan Domchek, Linda Fleisher, Lynne Wagner, Kuang-Yi Wen, Cara Cacioppo, Jessica E Ebrahimzadeh, Dana Falcone, Claire Langer, Elisabeth Wood, Kelsey Karpink, Shelby Posen, Enida Selmani, Angela R Bradbury
{"title":"开发MyCancerGene数字健康门户,以提高患者对生殖系癌症基因检测结果的理解:开发,用户和可用性测试研究。","authors":"Phillip Trieu, Dominique Fetzer, Briana McLeod, Kathryn Schweickert, Lauren Gutstein, Brian Egleston, Susan Domchek, Linda Fleisher, Lynne Wagner, Kuang-Yi Wen, Cara Cacioppo, Jessica E Ebrahimzadeh, Dana Falcone, Claire Langer, Elisabeth Wood, Kelsey Karpink, Shelby Posen, Enida Selmani, Angela R Bradbury","doi":"10.2196/56282","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The use of multigene panels has significantly increased the likelihood that genetic testing will leave patients with uncertainties regarding test interpretation, implications, and recommendations, which will change over time. Effective longitudinal care models are needed to provide patients with updated information and to obtain patient and family history updates.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To bridge this gap, we aimed to develop a patient- and genetic provider-informed digital genetic health portal (GHP), MyCancerGene, to improve longitudinal patient understanding of and responses to genetic testing.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used a 5-step process to develop MyCancerGene. To better understand their interest in and willingness to use a digital GHP, we surveyed 307 patients who completed genetic testing (step 1). We completed qualitative interviews with 10 patients and a focus group with 17 genetic providers to inform the content and function of MyCancerGene (step 2). Next, we developed initial intervention content (step 3) and completed user testing of intervention content with 25 providers and 28 patients (step 4). After developing the prototype intervention, we completed usability testing with 8 patients for their feedback on the final content, functions, and ease of use (step 5).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In surveys conducted in step 1, 90% of patients with positive results reported interest in a digital GHP, and over 75% of participants with variants of uncertain significance or uninformative negative results reported similar interest. The most frequently reported advantages among patients were increasing accessibility, convenience, and efficiency (103/224, 46%); keeping genetic information organized (54/224, 24.1%); and increasing or maintaining patient understanding of the information (38/224, 17%). In qualitative interviews (step 2), both patients and genetic providers endorsed the benefit of the tool for updating personal and family history and for providers to share new risk information, test interpretation, or other medical changes. Patient and provider input informed eight key components of the tool: (1) Landing Page, (2) Summary of Care page, (3) My Genetic Test Results page, (4) My Family History page, (5) Provide an Update page, (6) Review an Update page, (7) Resources page, and (8) the Screenings Tracker. They also recommended key functions, including the ability to download and print materials and the inclusion of reminders and engagement functions. Potential challenges identified by patients included privacy and security concerns (67/206, 32.5%) and the potential for electronic information to generate distress (20/206, 9.7%). While patients were comfortable with updates (ie, even variant reclassification upgrades or clinically significant results), 44% (11/25) of genetic providers were uncomfortable sharing variant reclassification upgrades through MyCancerGene.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>MyCancerGene, a patient-centered digital GHP, was developed with extensive patient and genetic provider feedback and designed to enhance longitudinal patient understanding of and affective and behavioral responses to genetic testing, particularly in the era of evolving evidence and risk information.</p>","PeriodicalId":14841,"journal":{"name":"JMIR Formative Research","volume":"9 ","pages":"e56282"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12120370/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Developing the MyCancerGene Digital Health Portal to Improve Patients' Understanding of Germline Cancer Genetic Test Results: Development, User, and Usability Testing Study.\",\"authors\":\"Phillip Trieu, Dominique Fetzer, Briana McLeod, Kathryn Schweickert, Lauren Gutstein, Brian Egleston, Susan Domchek, Linda Fleisher, Lynne Wagner, Kuang-Yi Wen, Cara Cacioppo, Jessica E Ebrahimzadeh, Dana Falcone, Claire Langer, Elisabeth Wood, Kelsey Karpink, Shelby Posen, Enida Selmani, Angela R Bradbury\",\"doi\":\"10.2196/56282\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The use of multigene panels has significantly increased the likelihood that genetic testing will leave patients with uncertainties regarding test interpretation, implications, and recommendations, which will change over time. Effective longitudinal care models are needed to provide patients with updated information and to obtain patient and family history updates.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To bridge this gap, we aimed to develop a patient- and genetic provider-informed digital genetic health portal (GHP), MyCancerGene, to improve longitudinal patient understanding of and responses to genetic testing.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used a 5-step process to develop MyCancerGene. To better understand their interest in and willingness to use a digital GHP, we surveyed 307 patients who completed genetic testing (step 1). We completed qualitative interviews with 10 patients and a focus group with 17 genetic providers to inform the content and function of MyCancerGene (step 2). Next, we developed initial intervention content (step 3) and completed user testing of intervention content with 25 providers and 28 patients (step 4). After developing the prototype intervention, we completed usability testing with 8 patients for their feedback on the final content, functions, and ease of use (step 5).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In surveys conducted in step 1, 90% of patients with positive results reported interest in a digital GHP, and over 75% of participants with variants of uncertain significance or uninformative negative results reported similar interest. The most frequently reported advantages among patients were increasing accessibility, convenience, and efficiency (103/224, 46%); keeping genetic information organized (54/224, 24.1%); and increasing or maintaining patient understanding of the information (38/224, 17%). In qualitative interviews (step 2), both patients and genetic providers endorsed the benefit of the tool for updating personal and family history and for providers to share new risk information, test interpretation, or other medical changes. Patient and provider input informed eight key components of the tool: (1) Landing Page, (2) Summary of Care page, (3) My Genetic Test Results page, (4) My Family History page, (5) Provide an Update page, (6) Review an Update page, (7) Resources page, and (8) the Screenings Tracker. They also recommended key functions, including the ability to download and print materials and the inclusion of reminders and engagement functions. Potential challenges identified by patients included privacy and security concerns (67/206, 32.5%) and the potential for electronic information to generate distress (20/206, 9.7%). While patients were comfortable with updates (ie, even variant reclassification upgrades or clinically significant results), 44% (11/25) of genetic providers were uncomfortable sharing variant reclassification upgrades through MyCancerGene.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>MyCancerGene, a patient-centered digital GHP, was developed with extensive patient and genetic provider feedback and designed to enhance longitudinal patient understanding of and affective and behavioral responses to genetic testing, particularly in the era of evolving evidence and risk information.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14841,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JMIR Formative Research\",\"volume\":\"9 \",\"pages\":\"e56282\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12120370/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JMIR Formative Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2196/56282\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JMIR Formative Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2196/56282","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:多基因面板的使用大大增加了基因检测给患者带来不确定性的可能性,这些不确定性包括检测的解释、含义和建议,这些都将随着时间的推移而改变。有效的纵向护理模式需要为患者提供最新的信息,并获得患者和家族史的更新。目的:为了弥补这一差距,我们旨在开发一个患者和遗传提供者知情的数字遗传健康门户网站(GHP), MyCancerGene,以提高患者对基因检测的纵向理解和反应。方法:我们采用五步法开发MyCancerGene。为了更好地了解他们对使用数字GHP的兴趣和意愿,我们调查了307名完成基因检测(第一步)的患者。我们完成了对10名患者的定性访谈和对17名遗传提供者的焦点小组访谈,以了解MyCancerGene的内容和功能(步骤2)。接下来,我们制定了初始干预内容(步骤3),并与25名提供者和28名患者完成了干预内容的用户测试(步骤4)。在开发出原型干预后,我们完成了8名患者的可用性测试,以了解他们对最终内容、功能和易用性的反馈(步骤5)。结果:在第1步进行的调查中,90%的阳性结果患者报告对数字GHP感兴趣,超过75%的具有不确定意义或无信息阴性结果的参与者报告了类似的兴趣。患者最常报告的优点是增加了可及性、便利性和效率(103/224,46%);保持遗传信息有序(54/224,24.1%);增加或维持患者对信息的理解(38/224,17%)。在定性访谈(第二步)中,患者和遗传服务提供者都认可该工具在更新个人和家族史方面的好处,并为提供者分享新的风险信息、测试解释或其他医疗变化提供了便利。患者和提供者的输入通知了该工具的八个关键组件:(1)登录页面,(2)护理摘要页面,(3)我的基因测试结果页面,(4)我的家族史页面,(5)提供更新页面,(6)回顾更新页面,(7)资源页面,以及(8)筛查跟踪器。他们还推荐了关键功能,包括下载和打印材料的能力,以及包含提醒和参与功能。患者确定的潜在挑战包括隐私和安全问题(67/206,32.5%)以及电子信息产生困扰的可能性(20/206,9.7%)。虽然患者对更新感到满意(即,甚至变体重分类升级或临床显着结果),但44%(11/25)的遗传提供者不愿意通过MyCancerGene分享变体重分类升级。结论:MyCancerGene是一个以患者为中心的数字GHP,它是在广泛的患者和遗传提供者反馈的基础上开发的,旨在增强患者对基因检测的纵向理解以及情感和行为反应,特别是在证据和风险信息不断发展的时代。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Developing the MyCancerGene Digital Health Portal to Improve Patients' Understanding of Germline Cancer Genetic Test Results: Development, User, and Usability Testing Study.

Background: The use of multigene panels has significantly increased the likelihood that genetic testing will leave patients with uncertainties regarding test interpretation, implications, and recommendations, which will change over time. Effective longitudinal care models are needed to provide patients with updated information and to obtain patient and family history updates.

Objective: To bridge this gap, we aimed to develop a patient- and genetic provider-informed digital genetic health portal (GHP), MyCancerGene, to improve longitudinal patient understanding of and responses to genetic testing.

Methods: We used a 5-step process to develop MyCancerGene. To better understand their interest in and willingness to use a digital GHP, we surveyed 307 patients who completed genetic testing (step 1). We completed qualitative interviews with 10 patients and a focus group with 17 genetic providers to inform the content and function of MyCancerGene (step 2). Next, we developed initial intervention content (step 3) and completed user testing of intervention content with 25 providers and 28 patients (step 4). After developing the prototype intervention, we completed usability testing with 8 patients for their feedback on the final content, functions, and ease of use (step 5).

Results: In surveys conducted in step 1, 90% of patients with positive results reported interest in a digital GHP, and over 75% of participants with variants of uncertain significance or uninformative negative results reported similar interest. The most frequently reported advantages among patients were increasing accessibility, convenience, and efficiency (103/224, 46%); keeping genetic information organized (54/224, 24.1%); and increasing or maintaining patient understanding of the information (38/224, 17%). In qualitative interviews (step 2), both patients and genetic providers endorsed the benefit of the tool for updating personal and family history and for providers to share new risk information, test interpretation, or other medical changes. Patient and provider input informed eight key components of the tool: (1) Landing Page, (2) Summary of Care page, (3) My Genetic Test Results page, (4) My Family History page, (5) Provide an Update page, (6) Review an Update page, (7) Resources page, and (8) the Screenings Tracker. They also recommended key functions, including the ability to download and print materials and the inclusion of reminders and engagement functions. Potential challenges identified by patients included privacy and security concerns (67/206, 32.5%) and the potential for electronic information to generate distress (20/206, 9.7%). While patients were comfortable with updates (ie, even variant reclassification upgrades or clinically significant results), 44% (11/25) of genetic providers were uncomfortable sharing variant reclassification upgrades through MyCancerGene.

Conclusions: MyCancerGene, a patient-centered digital GHP, was developed with extensive patient and genetic provider feedback and designed to enhance longitudinal patient understanding of and affective and behavioral responses to genetic testing, particularly in the era of evolving evidence and risk information.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
JMIR Formative Research
JMIR Formative Research Medicine-Medicine (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
9.10%
发文量
579
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信