缓解疼痛:利多卡因喷雾在中期羊膜穿刺术-一项随机双盲,安慰剂对照试验。

Tanya Sharma, Meenakshi Gothwal, Charu Sharma, Pratibha Singh, Garima Yadav, Manoj Kumar Gupta, Manisha Jhirwal, Priyanka Kathuria
{"title":"缓解疼痛:利多卡因喷雾在中期羊膜穿刺术-一项随机双盲,安慰剂对照试验。","authors":"Tanya Sharma, Meenakshi Gothwal, Charu Sharma, Pratibha Singh, Garima Yadav, Manoj Kumar Gupta, Manisha Jhirwal, Priyanka Kathuria","doi":"10.71480/nmj.v66i1.737","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>To evaluate the effect of lignocaine spray on maternal pain perception during mid-trimester amniocentesis compared to placebo.</p><p><strong>Methodology: </strong>This was a double-blinded, prospective, randomized controlled trial conducted at a tertiary teaching hospital in Western Rajasthan. Singleton pregnancies between 15- and 24-weeks' gestation undergoing amniocentesis were included. Participants were randomly assigned to receive either lignocaine spray or placebo (normal saline). Pain was assessed using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), Verbal Rating Scale (VRS), and Numerical Rating Scale (NRS). A total of 138 women were enrolled, with 69 receiving lignocaine spray and 69 receiving placebos.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Pain perception measured by VAS showed no significant difference between the lignocaine and placebo groups (p = 0.412). VRS and VAS demonstrated a positive correlation (r = 0.692, p < 0.001). Median VAS scores at 30 minutes post-procedure were significantly lower in the lignocaine group (p = 0.008). The Kappa agreement between VAS and VRS was found to be 59.20%. No significant difference in procedure-related complications was observed between groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The study demonstrates no significant difference in VAS scores or secondary outcomes between the lignocaine and placebo groups, suggesting that lignocaine spray may not provide additional benefit for pain relief in amniocentesis.</p>","PeriodicalId":94346,"journal":{"name":"Nigerian medical journal : journal of the Nigeria Medical Association","volume":"66 1","pages":"327-336"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12038618/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Easing the Pain: Lignocaine Spray in Mid-Trimester Amniocentesis - A Randomized Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial.\",\"authors\":\"Tanya Sharma, Meenakshi Gothwal, Charu Sharma, Pratibha Singh, Garima Yadav, Manoj Kumar Gupta, Manisha Jhirwal, Priyanka Kathuria\",\"doi\":\"10.71480/nmj.v66i1.737\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>To evaluate the effect of lignocaine spray on maternal pain perception during mid-trimester amniocentesis compared to placebo.</p><p><strong>Methodology: </strong>This was a double-blinded, prospective, randomized controlled trial conducted at a tertiary teaching hospital in Western Rajasthan. Singleton pregnancies between 15- and 24-weeks' gestation undergoing amniocentesis were included. Participants were randomly assigned to receive either lignocaine spray or placebo (normal saline). Pain was assessed using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), Verbal Rating Scale (VRS), and Numerical Rating Scale (NRS). A total of 138 women were enrolled, with 69 receiving lignocaine spray and 69 receiving placebos.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Pain perception measured by VAS showed no significant difference between the lignocaine and placebo groups (p = 0.412). VRS and VAS demonstrated a positive correlation (r = 0.692, p < 0.001). Median VAS scores at 30 minutes post-procedure were significantly lower in the lignocaine group (p = 0.008). The Kappa agreement between VAS and VRS was found to be 59.20%. No significant difference in procedure-related complications was observed between groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The study demonstrates no significant difference in VAS scores or secondary outcomes between the lignocaine and placebo groups, suggesting that lignocaine spray may not provide additional benefit for pain relief in amniocentesis.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94346,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nigerian medical journal : journal of the Nigeria Medical Association\",\"volume\":\"66 1\",\"pages\":\"327-336\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12038618/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nigerian medical journal : journal of the Nigeria Medical Association\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.71480/nmj.v66i1.737\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nigerian medical journal : journal of the Nigeria Medical Association","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.71480/nmj.v66i1.737","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:评价利多卡因喷雾对妊娠中期羊膜穿刺术产妇疼痛感知的影响。方法:这是一项双盲、前瞻性、随机对照试验,在拉贾斯坦邦西部的一家三级教学医院进行。在15- 24周的单胎妊娠中进行羊膜穿刺术。参与者被随机分配接受利多卡因喷雾或安慰剂(生理盐水)。采用视觉模拟量表(VAS)、言语评定量表(VRS)和数值评定量表(NRS)对疼痛进行评定。总共有138名女性被招募,其中69名接受了利多卡因喷雾,69名接受了安慰剂。结果:疼痛感知VAS测量结果显示,利多卡因组与安慰剂组之间无显著差异(p = 0.412)。VRS与VAS呈正相关(r = 0.692, p < 0.001)。术后30分钟,利多卡因组VAS评分中位数显著降低(p = 0.008)。VAS与VRS的Kappa一致性为59.20%。两组手术相关并发症无显著差异。结论:研究显示,利多卡因组和安慰剂组在VAS评分和次要结局方面无显著差异,提示利多卡因喷雾剂可能不会对羊膜穿刺术疼痛缓解提供额外的益处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Easing the Pain: Lignocaine Spray in Mid-Trimester Amniocentesis - A Randomized Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial.

Background: To evaluate the effect of lignocaine spray on maternal pain perception during mid-trimester amniocentesis compared to placebo.

Methodology: This was a double-blinded, prospective, randomized controlled trial conducted at a tertiary teaching hospital in Western Rajasthan. Singleton pregnancies between 15- and 24-weeks' gestation undergoing amniocentesis were included. Participants were randomly assigned to receive either lignocaine spray or placebo (normal saline). Pain was assessed using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), Verbal Rating Scale (VRS), and Numerical Rating Scale (NRS). A total of 138 women were enrolled, with 69 receiving lignocaine spray and 69 receiving placebos.

Results: Pain perception measured by VAS showed no significant difference between the lignocaine and placebo groups (p = 0.412). VRS and VAS demonstrated a positive correlation (r = 0.692, p < 0.001). Median VAS scores at 30 minutes post-procedure were significantly lower in the lignocaine group (p = 0.008). The Kappa agreement between VAS and VRS was found to be 59.20%. No significant difference in procedure-related complications was observed between groups.

Conclusion: The study demonstrates no significant difference in VAS scores or secondary outcomes between the lignocaine and placebo groups, suggesting that lignocaine spray may not provide additional benefit for pain relief in amniocentesis.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信