碳纤维增强PEEK脊柱内固定在脊柱肿瘤学中的耐久性:单一机构纵向经验。

IF 3.3 2区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Mark Damante, Seth B Wilson, Jacob Ward, Kofi Mensah-Arhin, Shivam Gandhi, Anas Bardeesi, David Xu, Joshua Palmer, J Bradley Elder, Vikram B Chakravarthy
{"title":"碳纤维增强PEEK脊柱内固定在脊柱肿瘤学中的耐久性:单一机构纵向经验。","authors":"Mark Damante, Seth B Wilson, Jacob Ward, Kofi Mensah-Arhin, Shivam Gandhi, Anas Bardeesi, David Xu, Joshua Palmer, J Bradley Elder, Vikram B Chakravarthy","doi":"10.3171/2025.2.FOCUS24976","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Carbon fiber-reinforced polyetheretherketone (CFR-PEEK) instrumentation is increasingly being used in patients with spine tumors as the body of literature supporting its benefit in local disease surveillance and radiation planning grows. Small single-institution experiences with short-term follow-up have yet to demonstrate issues with construct durability despite different biomechanical properties of CFR-PEEK compared to titanium. In this study the authors evaluated CFR-PEEK hardware failures in patients with surgically treated spine tumors who had long-term follow-up.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is an IRB-approved retrospective cohort study of patients with spine tumors who underwent instrumented spinal fusion with CFR-PEEK or titanium instrumentation at a single tertiary care center. Inclusion criteria were as follows: 1) age > 18 years; 2) pedicle screw fixation with CFR-PEEK or titanium; and 3) minimum 6 months of follow-up. The surgical indication was reviewed and agreed upon at a multidisciplinary spine tumor board meeting.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 190 patients undergoing CFR-PEEK instrumentation were identified during the study period; 148 had at least a 6-month follow-up. Of those 148, the median follow-up was 13.7 months. In total, there were 861 CFR-PEEK pedicle screws, 266 CFR-PEEK spinal rods, and 15 CFR-PEEK corpectomy cages included in the study. Percutaneous CFR-PEEK instrumentation was performed in 13 cases. There were 6 (4.1%) CFR-PEEK cases of mechanical/hardware failure, with a median interval time to failure of 5.51 (range 2.74-9.38) months. There were no hardware-related complications in the 26 patients who received CFR-PEEK instrumentation and who had a > 24-month follow-up.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This institutional experience provides the largest cohort with long-term follow-up to evaluate CFR-PEEK-related instrumentation failure in patients with spine tumors. The rate of hardware failure among CFR-PEEK instrumented constructs was comparable to that in the current literature for titanium implants used in degenerative spine and spine oncology treatment. Importantly, there were no hardware failures noted among patients with extended long-term survival, reinforcing the durability of CFR-PEEK instrumentation.</p>","PeriodicalId":19187,"journal":{"name":"Neurosurgical focus","volume":"58 5","pages":"E10"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Durability of carbon fiber-reinforced PEEK spinal instrumentation in spine oncology: a single-institution longitudinal experience.\",\"authors\":\"Mark Damante, Seth B Wilson, Jacob Ward, Kofi Mensah-Arhin, Shivam Gandhi, Anas Bardeesi, David Xu, Joshua Palmer, J Bradley Elder, Vikram B Chakravarthy\",\"doi\":\"10.3171/2025.2.FOCUS24976\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Carbon fiber-reinforced polyetheretherketone (CFR-PEEK) instrumentation is increasingly being used in patients with spine tumors as the body of literature supporting its benefit in local disease surveillance and radiation planning grows. Small single-institution experiences with short-term follow-up have yet to demonstrate issues with construct durability despite different biomechanical properties of CFR-PEEK compared to titanium. In this study the authors evaluated CFR-PEEK hardware failures in patients with surgically treated spine tumors who had long-term follow-up.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is an IRB-approved retrospective cohort study of patients with spine tumors who underwent instrumented spinal fusion with CFR-PEEK or titanium instrumentation at a single tertiary care center. Inclusion criteria were as follows: 1) age > 18 years; 2) pedicle screw fixation with CFR-PEEK or titanium; and 3) minimum 6 months of follow-up. The surgical indication was reviewed and agreed upon at a multidisciplinary spine tumor board meeting.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 190 patients undergoing CFR-PEEK instrumentation were identified during the study period; 148 had at least a 6-month follow-up. Of those 148, the median follow-up was 13.7 months. In total, there were 861 CFR-PEEK pedicle screws, 266 CFR-PEEK spinal rods, and 15 CFR-PEEK corpectomy cages included in the study. Percutaneous CFR-PEEK instrumentation was performed in 13 cases. There were 6 (4.1%) CFR-PEEK cases of mechanical/hardware failure, with a median interval time to failure of 5.51 (range 2.74-9.38) months. There were no hardware-related complications in the 26 patients who received CFR-PEEK instrumentation and who had a > 24-month follow-up.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This institutional experience provides the largest cohort with long-term follow-up to evaluate CFR-PEEK-related instrumentation failure in patients with spine tumors. The rate of hardware failure among CFR-PEEK instrumented constructs was comparable to that in the current literature for titanium implants used in degenerative spine and spine oncology treatment. Importantly, there were no hardware failures noted among patients with extended long-term survival, reinforcing the durability of CFR-PEEK instrumentation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19187,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Neurosurgical focus\",\"volume\":\"58 5\",\"pages\":\"E10\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Neurosurgical focus\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3171/2025.2.FOCUS24976\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurosurgical focus","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3171/2025.2.FOCUS24976","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:碳纤维增强聚醚醚酮(CFR-PEEK)仪器越来越多地用于脊柱肿瘤患者,因为越来越多的文献支持其在局部疾病监测和放射计划中的益处。尽管与钛相比,CFR-PEEK具有不同的生物力学性能,但小型单一机构的短期随访经验尚未证明结构耐久性存在问题。在这项研究中,作者评估了长期随访的手术治疗脊柱肿瘤患者的CFR-PEEK硬体失效。方法:这是一项经irb批准的回顾性队列研究,研究对象是在单一三级医疗中心接受CFR-PEEK或钛内固定脊柱融合术的脊柱肿瘤患者。纳入标准如下:1)年龄bb0 ~ 18岁;2)用CFR-PEEK或钛固定椎弓根螺钉;3)至少6个月的随访。手术指征在多学科脊柱肿瘤委员会会议上进行了审查并达成一致。结果:在研究期间,共有190例患者接受了CFR-PEEK检测;148人至少进行了6个月的随访。在这148人中,中位随访时间为13.7个月。本研究共纳入了861枚CFR-PEEK椎弓根螺钉、266枚CFR-PEEK椎棒和15枚CFR-PEEK椎体切除笼。经皮CFR-PEEK内固定13例。6例(4.1%)CFR-PEEK出现机械/硬件故障,中位故障间隔时间为5.51个月(2.74-9.38个月)。26例接受CFR-PEEK内固定的患者无硬件相关并发症,随访24个月。结论:该机构的经验为评估脊柱肿瘤患者cfr - peek相关器械失效提供了最大的长期随访队列。CFR-PEEK置入置入物的硬件失败率与目前文献中用于退行性脊柱和脊柱肿瘤治疗的钛植入物的失败率相当。重要的是,在延长长期生存期的患者中没有发现硬件故障,这加强了CFR-PEEK器械的耐用性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Durability of carbon fiber-reinforced PEEK spinal instrumentation in spine oncology: a single-institution longitudinal experience.

Objective: Carbon fiber-reinforced polyetheretherketone (CFR-PEEK) instrumentation is increasingly being used in patients with spine tumors as the body of literature supporting its benefit in local disease surveillance and radiation planning grows. Small single-institution experiences with short-term follow-up have yet to demonstrate issues with construct durability despite different biomechanical properties of CFR-PEEK compared to titanium. In this study the authors evaluated CFR-PEEK hardware failures in patients with surgically treated spine tumors who had long-term follow-up.

Methods: This is an IRB-approved retrospective cohort study of patients with spine tumors who underwent instrumented spinal fusion with CFR-PEEK or titanium instrumentation at a single tertiary care center. Inclusion criteria were as follows: 1) age > 18 years; 2) pedicle screw fixation with CFR-PEEK or titanium; and 3) minimum 6 months of follow-up. The surgical indication was reviewed and agreed upon at a multidisciplinary spine tumor board meeting.

Results: A total of 190 patients undergoing CFR-PEEK instrumentation were identified during the study period; 148 had at least a 6-month follow-up. Of those 148, the median follow-up was 13.7 months. In total, there were 861 CFR-PEEK pedicle screws, 266 CFR-PEEK spinal rods, and 15 CFR-PEEK corpectomy cages included in the study. Percutaneous CFR-PEEK instrumentation was performed in 13 cases. There were 6 (4.1%) CFR-PEEK cases of mechanical/hardware failure, with a median interval time to failure of 5.51 (range 2.74-9.38) months. There were no hardware-related complications in the 26 patients who received CFR-PEEK instrumentation and who had a > 24-month follow-up.

Conclusions: This institutional experience provides the largest cohort with long-term follow-up to evaluate CFR-PEEK-related instrumentation failure in patients with spine tumors. The rate of hardware failure among CFR-PEEK instrumented constructs was comparable to that in the current literature for titanium implants used in degenerative spine and spine oncology treatment. Importantly, there were no hardware failures noted among patients with extended long-term survival, reinforcing the durability of CFR-PEEK instrumentation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Neurosurgical focus
Neurosurgical focus CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-SURGERY
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
261
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Information not localized
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信