Justin Baraboo, Amanda DiCarlo, Haben Berhane, Daming Shen, Rod Passman, Daniel C Lee, Patrick M McCarthy, Rishi Arora, Dan Kim, Michael Markl
{"title":"基于深度学习的心房颤动患者实时相对比MRI自动左心房分割和血流定量。","authors":"Justin Baraboo, Amanda DiCarlo, Haben Berhane, Daming Shen, Rod Passman, Daniel C Lee, Patrick M McCarthy, Rishi Arora, Dan Kim, Michael Markl","doi":"10.1007/s10554-025-03407-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Real time 2D phase contrast (RTPC) MRI is useful for flow quantification in atrial fibrillation (AF) patients, but data analysis requires time-consuming anatomical contouring for many cardiac time frames. Our goal was to develop a convolutional neural network (CNN) for fully automated left atrial (LA) flow quantification. Forty-four AF patients underwent cardiac MRI including LA RTPC, collecting a median of 358 timeframes per scan. 15,307 semi-manual derived RTPC LA contours comprised ground truth for CNN training, validation, and testing. CNN vs. human performance was assessed using Dice scores (DSC), Hausdorff distance (HD), and flow measures (stasis, velocities, flow). LA contour DSC across all patients were similar to human inter-observer DSC (0.90 vs. 0.93) and a median 4.6 mm [3.5-5.9 mm] HD. There was no impact of heart rate variability on contouring quality (low vs. high variability DSC: 0.92 ± 0.05 vs. 0.91 ± 0.03, p = 0.95). CNN based LA flow quantification showed good to excellent agreement with semi-manual analysis (r > 0.90) and small bias in Bland-Altman analysis for mean velocity (-0.10 cm/s), stasis (1%), and net flow (-2.4 ml/s). This study demonstrated the feasibility of CNN based LA flow analysis with good agreements in LA contours and flow measures and resilience to heartbeat variability in AF.</p>","PeriodicalId":94227,"journal":{"name":"The international journal of cardiovascular imaging","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Deep learning based automated left atrial segmentation and flow quantification of real time phase contrast MRI in patients with atrial fibrillation.\",\"authors\":\"Justin Baraboo, Amanda DiCarlo, Haben Berhane, Daming Shen, Rod Passman, Daniel C Lee, Patrick M McCarthy, Rishi Arora, Dan Kim, Michael Markl\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10554-025-03407-9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Real time 2D phase contrast (RTPC) MRI is useful for flow quantification in atrial fibrillation (AF) patients, but data analysis requires time-consuming anatomical contouring for many cardiac time frames. Our goal was to develop a convolutional neural network (CNN) for fully automated left atrial (LA) flow quantification. Forty-four AF patients underwent cardiac MRI including LA RTPC, collecting a median of 358 timeframes per scan. 15,307 semi-manual derived RTPC LA contours comprised ground truth for CNN training, validation, and testing. CNN vs. human performance was assessed using Dice scores (DSC), Hausdorff distance (HD), and flow measures (stasis, velocities, flow). LA contour DSC across all patients were similar to human inter-observer DSC (0.90 vs. 0.93) and a median 4.6 mm [3.5-5.9 mm] HD. There was no impact of heart rate variability on contouring quality (low vs. high variability DSC: 0.92 ± 0.05 vs. 0.91 ± 0.03, p = 0.95). CNN based LA flow quantification showed good to excellent agreement with semi-manual analysis (r > 0.90) and small bias in Bland-Altman analysis for mean velocity (-0.10 cm/s), stasis (1%), and net flow (-2.4 ml/s). This study demonstrated the feasibility of CNN based LA flow analysis with good agreements in LA contours and flow measures and resilience to heartbeat variability in AF.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94227,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The international journal of cardiovascular imaging\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The international journal of cardiovascular imaging\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10554-025-03407-9\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The international journal of cardiovascular imaging","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10554-025-03407-9","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
实时二维相位对比(RTPC) MRI对房颤(AF)患者的血流定量有用,但数据分析需要对许多心脏时间框架进行耗时的解剖轮廓。我们的目标是开发一种卷积神经网络(CNN)用于全自动左心房(LA)血流量化。44例房颤患者接受了包括LA RTPC在内的心脏MRI,每次扫描的中位数为358个时间框架。15,307张半手动导出的RTPC LA轮廓包括CNN训练、验证和测试的地面真相。CNN与人类的表现是通过Dice分数(DSC)、Hausdorff距离(HD)和流量测量(停滞、速度、流量)来评估的。所有患者的LA轮廓DSC与人类观察者间DSC相似(0.90 vs. 0.93),中位HD为4.6 mm [3.5-5.9 mm]。心率变异性对轮廓质量没有影响(低变异性vs高变异性DSC: 0.92±0.05 vs 0.91±0.03,p = 0.95)。基于CNN的LA流量定量与半人工分析(r > 0.90)的一致性很好,在Bland-Altman分析中,平均流速(-0.10 cm/s)、停滞(1%)和净流量(-2.4 ml/s)的偏差很小。本研究证明了基于CNN的左心室血流分析的可行性,在心房颤动的左心室轮廓和血流测量以及对心跳变异性的适应性方面具有良好的一致性。
Deep learning based automated left atrial segmentation and flow quantification of real time phase contrast MRI in patients with atrial fibrillation.
Real time 2D phase contrast (RTPC) MRI is useful for flow quantification in atrial fibrillation (AF) patients, but data analysis requires time-consuming anatomical contouring for many cardiac time frames. Our goal was to develop a convolutional neural network (CNN) for fully automated left atrial (LA) flow quantification. Forty-four AF patients underwent cardiac MRI including LA RTPC, collecting a median of 358 timeframes per scan. 15,307 semi-manual derived RTPC LA contours comprised ground truth for CNN training, validation, and testing. CNN vs. human performance was assessed using Dice scores (DSC), Hausdorff distance (HD), and flow measures (stasis, velocities, flow). LA contour DSC across all patients were similar to human inter-observer DSC (0.90 vs. 0.93) and a median 4.6 mm [3.5-5.9 mm] HD. There was no impact of heart rate variability on contouring quality (low vs. high variability DSC: 0.92 ± 0.05 vs. 0.91 ± 0.03, p = 0.95). CNN based LA flow quantification showed good to excellent agreement with semi-manual analysis (r > 0.90) and small bias in Bland-Altman analysis for mean velocity (-0.10 cm/s), stasis (1%), and net flow (-2.4 ml/s). This study demonstrated the feasibility of CNN based LA flow analysis with good agreements in LA contours and flow measures and resilience to heartbeat variability in AF.