Yongdi Wang , Qian Chen , Ce Zhu , Youwei Ai , Juehan Wang , Hong Ding , Dun Luo , Lei Wang , Chunguang Zhou , Jing Tang ∗ , Limin Liu
{"title":"简化S1椎体骨质量评分预测腰椎滑脱患者螺钉松动。","authors":"Yongdi Wang , Qian Chen , Ce Zhu , Youwei Ai , Juehan Wang , Hong Ding , Dun Luo , Lei Wang , Chunguang Zhou , Jing Tang ∗ , Limin Liu","doi":"10.1016/j.wneu.2025.124012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>Investigate whether S1 vertebral bone quality (VBQ) score serves as a viable substitute for the traditional VBQ score in predicting screw loosening in patients undergoing transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) for lumbar spondylolisthesis using quantitative computed tomography (QCT) as a standard reference.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We reviewed 165 patients undergoing single-segment TLIF for lumbar spondylolisthesis at our center from 2012 to 2021. Demographic and radiographic data were collected. To determine the independent factors affecting pedicle screw loosening, univariate analysis and multivariate logistic regression were conducted. Receiver operating characteristic analysis was carried out to assess the predictive ability.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>16.3% of patients experienced screw loosening at a minimum of 24 months of follow-up. Statistically significant differences in the 2 groups were observed in surgery level (L5–S1), traditional VBQ, S1 VBQ, and QCT values. QCT values, traditional VBQ score, and the S1 VBQ score were independent risk factors for screw loosening. The receiver operating characteristic analysis showed that area under the curve (AUC) of QCT was 0.839 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.771–0.907) and the cut-off value was 119 (sensitivity: 85.2% and specificity: 76.8%); AUC of VBQ scores was 0.787 (95% CI: 0.699–0.875) and the cut-off value was 3.585 (sensitivity: 88.9% and specificity: 69.6%), while AUC of S1 VBQ score was 0.823 (95% CI: 0.739–0.908) and the cut-off value was 3.72 (sensitivity: 81.5% and specificity: 76.8%).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The elevated S1 VBQ score was identified as an independent risk factor for screw loosening and exhibits greater predictive capability compared to the traditional VBQ score in forecasting screw loosening following TLIF for lumbar spondylolisthesis.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":23906,"journal":{"name":"World neurosurgery","volume":"198 ","pages":"Article 124012"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Simplified S1 Vertebral Bone Quality Score Predicts Screw Loosening in Patients with Lumbar Spondylolisthesis\",\"authors\":\"Yongdi Wang , Qian Chen , Ce Zhu , Youwei Ai , Juehan Wang , Hong Ding , Dun Luo , Lei Wang , Chunguang Zhou , Jing Tang ∗ , Limin Liu\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.wneu.2025.124012\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>Investigate whether S1 vertebral bone quality (VBQ) score serves as a viable substitute for the traditional VBQ score in predicting screw loosening in patients undergoing transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) for lumbar spondylolisthesis using quantitative computed tomography (QCT) as a standard reference.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We reviewed 165 patients undergoing single-segment TLIF for lumbar spondylolisthesis at our center from 2012 to 2021. Demographic and radiographic data were collected. To determine the independent factors affecting pedicle screw loosening, univariate analysis and multivariate logistic regression were conducted. Receiver operating characteristic analysis was carried out to assess the predictive ability.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>16.3% of patients experienced screw loosening at a minimum of 24 months of follow-up. Statistically significant differences in the 2 groups were observed in surgery level (L5–S1), traditional VBQ, S1 VBQ, and QCT values. QCT values, traditional VBQ score, and the S1 VBQ score were independent risk factors for screw loosening. The receiver operating characteristic analysis showed that area under the curve (AUC) of QCT was 0.839 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.771–0.907) and the cut-off value was 119 (sensitivity: 85.2% and specificity: 76.8%); AUC of VBQ scores was 0.787 (95% CI: 0.699–0.875) and the cut-off value was 3.585 (sensitivity: 88.9% and specificity: 69.6%), while AUC of S1 VBQ score was 0.823 (95% CI: 0.739–0.908) and the cut-off value was 3.72 (sensitivity: 81.5% and specificity: 76.8%).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The elevated S1 VBQ score was identified as an independent risk factor for screw loosening and exhibits greater predictive capability compared to the traditional VBQ score in forecasting screw loosening following TLIF for lumbar spondylolisthesis.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23906,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"World neurosurgery\",\"volume\":\"198 \",\"pages\":\"Article 124012\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"World neurosurgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1878875025003687\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World neurosurgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1878875025003687","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Simplified S1 Vertebral Bone Quality Score Predicts Screw Loosening in Patients with Lumbar Spondylolisthesis
Objective
Investigate whether S1 vertebral bone quality (VBQ) score serves as a viable substitute for the traditional VBQ score in predicting screw loosening in patients undergoing transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) for lumbar spondylolisthesis using quantitative computed tomography (QCT) as a standard reference.
Methods
We reviewed 165 patients undergoing single-segment TLIF for lumbar spondylolisthesis at our center from 2012 to 2021. Demographic and radiographic data were collected. To determine the independent factors affecting pedicle screw loosening, univariate analysis and multivariate logistic regression were conducted. Receiver operating characteristic analysis was carried out to assess the predictive ability.
Results
16.3% of patients experienced screw loosening at a minimum of 24 months of follow-up. Statistically significant differences in the 2 groups were observed in surgery level (L5–S1), traditional VBQ, S1 VBQ, and QCT values. QCT values, traditional VBQ score, and the S1 VBQ score were independent risk factors for screw loosening. The receiver operating characteristic analysis showed that area under the curve (AUC) of QCT was 0.839 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.771–0.907) and the cut-off value was 119 (sensitivity: 85.2% and specificity: 76.8%); AUC of VBQ scores was 0.787 (95% CI: 0.699–0.875) and the cut-off value was 3.585 (sensitivity: 88.9% and specificity: 69.6%), while AUC of S1 VBQ score was 0.823 (95% CI: 0.739–0.908) and the cut-off value was 3.72 (sensitivity: 81.5% and specificity: 76.8%).
Conclusions
The elevated S1 VBQ score was identified as an independent risk factor for screw loosening and exhibits greater predictive capability compared to the traditional VBQ score in forecasting screw loosening following TLIF for lumbar spondylolisthesis.
期刊介绍:
World Neurosurgery has an open access mirror journal World Neurosurgery: X, sharing the same aims and scope, editorial team, submission system and rigorous peer review.
The journal''s mission is to:
-To provide a first-class international forum and a 2-way conduit for dialogue that is relevant to neurosurgeons and providers who care for neurosurgery patients. The categories of the exchanged information include clinical and basic science, as well as global information that provide social, political, educational, economic, cultural or societal insights and knowledge that are of significance and relevance to worldwide neurosurgery patient care.
-To act as a primary intellectual catalyst for the stimulation of creativity, the creation of new knowledge, and the enhancement of quality neurosurgical care worldwide.
-To provide a forum for communication that enriches the lives of all neurosurgeons and their colleagues; and, in so doing, enriches the lives of their patients.
Topics to be addressed in World Neurosurgery include: EDUCATION, ECONOMICS, RESEARCH, POLITICS, HISTORY, CULTURE, CLINICAL SCIENCE, LABORATORY SCIENCE, TECHNOLOGY, OPERATIVE TECHNIQUES, CLINICAL IMAGES, VIDEOS