人工智能驱动的血糖控制干预措施的有效性:随机对照试验的系统回顾和荟萃分析。

Khadija Elmotia, Oumaima Abouyaala, Soukaina Bougrine, Moulay Laarbi Ouahidi
{"title":"人工智能驱动的血糖控制干预措施的有效性:随机对照试验的系统回顾和荟萃分析。","authors":"Khadija Elmotia, Oumaima Abouyaala, Soukaina Bougrine, Moulay Laarbi Ouahidi","doi":"10.1016/j.pcd.2025.05.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This systematic review aims to assess the effectiveness of AI-Driven Decision Support Systems in improving glycemic control, measured by Time in Range (TIR) and HbA1c levels, in patients with diabetes. Included studies were randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that evaluated AI interventions in diabetes management. Exclusion criteria included non-English studies, non-peer-reviewed articles. Studies were identified by searching electronic databases including PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library up to December 2024. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool for RCTs. Results were synthesized using a random-effects meta-analysis model. The review included 17 RCTs with a total of 3381 participants in the intervention group and 3176 in the control group. AI interventions were found to significantly improve TIR and reduce HbA1c levels. The meta-analysis for TIR yielded a mean difference of 0.54 (95 % CI: 0.05-1.03), and for HbA1c a standardized mean difference of -0.91 (95 % CI: -1.23 to -0.58). Evidence was limited by high heterogeneity (I² > 90 % for both outcomes) and indications of publication bias, which may overestimate the effectiveness reported. Despite limitations, the results support the potential of AI interventions in enhancing diabetes management, though variability in effectiveness suggests the need for personalized approaches.</p>","PeriodicalId":94177,"journal":{"name":"Primary care diabetes","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effectiveness of AI-driven interventions in glycemic control: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.\",\"authors\":\"Khadija Elmotia, Oumaima Abouyaala, Soukaina Bougrine, Moulay Laarbi Ouahidi\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.pcd.2025.05.004\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This systematic review aims to assess the effectiveness of AI-Driven Decision Support Systems in improving glycemic control, measured by Time in Range (TIR) and HbA1c levels, in patients with diabetes. Included studies were randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that evaluated AI interventions in diabetes management. Exclusion criteria included non-English studies, non-peer-reviewed articles. Studies were identified by searching electronic databases including PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library up to December 2024. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool for RCTs. Results were synthesized using a random-effects meta-analysis model. The review included 17 RCTs with a total of 3381 participants in the intervention group and 3176 in the control group. AI interventions were found to significantly improve TIR and reduce HbA1c levels. The meta-analysis for TIR yielded a mean difference of 0.54 (95 % CI: 0.05-1.03), and for HbA1c a standardized mean difference of -0.91 (95 % CI: -1.23 to -0.58). Evidence was limited by high heterogeneity (I² > 90 % for both outcomes) and indications of publication bias, which may overestimate the effectiveness reported. Despite limitations, the results support the potential of AI interventions in enhancing diabetes management, though variability in effectiveness suggests the need for personalized approaches.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94177,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Primary care diabetes\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Primary care diabetes\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pcd.2025.05.004\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Primary care diabetes","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pcd.2025.05.004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本系统综述旨在评估人工智能驱动的决策支持系统在改善糖尿病患者血糖控制方面的有效性,通过时间范围(TIR)和HbA1c水平来衡量。纳入的研究是评估人工智能干预糖尿病管理的随机对照试验(rct)。排除标准包括非英语研究、非同行评议的文章。通过检索PubMed、EMBASE和Cochrane Library等电子数据库确定研究截止到2024年12月。使用Cochrane rct偏倚风险工具评估偏倚风险。结果采用随机效应荟萃分析模型进行综合。本综述纳入17项随机对照试验,干预组共3381名参与者,对照组3176名参与者。人工智能干预可显著改善TIR并降低HbA1c水平。TIR的荟萃分析得出的平均差异为0.54(95 % CI: 0.05-1.03), HbA1c的标准化平均差异为-0.91(95 % CI: -1.23至-0.58)。证据受到高度异质性(两种结果均为I²bbb90 %)和发表偏倚指指的限制,这可能高估了报道的有效性。尽管存在局限性,但结果支持人工智能干预在加强糖尿病管理方面的潜力,尽管有效性的可变性表明需要个性化的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effectiveness of AI-driven interventions in glycemic control: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

This systematic review aims to assess the effectiveness of AI-Driven Decision Support Systems in improving glycemic control, measured by Time in Range (TIR) and HbA1c levels, in patients with diabetes. Included studies were randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that evaluated AI interventions in diabetes management. Exclusion criteria included non-English studies, non-peer-reviewed articles. Studies were identified by searching electronic databases including PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library up to December 2024. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool for RCTs. Results were synthesized using a random-effects meta-analysis model. The review included 17 RCTs with a total of 3381 participants in the intervention group and 3176 in the control group. AI interventions were found to significantly improve TIR and reduce HbA1c levels. The meta-analysis for TIR yielded a mean difference of 0.54 (95 % CI: 0.05-1.03), and for HbA1c a standardized mean difference of -0.91 (95 % CI: -1.23 to -0.58). Evidence was limited by high heterogeneity (I² > 90 % for both outcomes) and indications of publication bias, which may overestimate the effectiveness reported. Despite limitations, the results support the potential of AI interventions in enhancing diabetes management, though variability in effectiveness suggests the need for personalized approaches.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信