长期PM2.5峰值在心血管风险中的作用:一项AIRCARD子研究。

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Stephan Peronard Mayntz, Solveig Warncke, Lærke Groth Ladefoged, Roda Abdulkadir Mohamed, Anna Mejldal, Jes Sanddal Lindholt, Axel Cosmus Pyndt Diederichsen, Lise Marie Frohn, Jørgen Brandt, Matthias Ketzel, Jibran Khan, Jess Lambrechtsen
{"title":"长期PM2.5峰值在心血管风险中的作用:一项AIRCARD子研究。","authors":"Stephan Peronard Mayntz, Solveig Warncke, Lærke Groth Ladefoged, Roda Abdulkadir Mohamed, Anna Mejldal, Jes Sanddal Lindholt, Axel Cosmus Pyndt Diederichsen, Lise Marie Frohn, Jørgen Brandt, Matthias Ketzel, Jibran Khan, Jess Lambrechtsen","doi":"10.1016/j.jjcc.2025.04.012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Cardiovascular disease is a leading cause of mortality globally, with air pollution, particularly fine particulate matter (PM<sub>2.5</sub>), recognized as a significant risk factor. While long-term accumulated exposure to PM<sub>2.5</sub> has been extensively studied, the impact of PM<sub>2.5</sub> peaks on cardiovascular events remains unexplored.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This prospective cohort study analyzed data from 26,723 male participants aged 65 to 74 years from the Danish DANCAVAS and VIVA screening trials. We assessed the association between long-term cumulated repeated PM<sub>2.5</sub> peak exposure and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), including non-fatal acute myocardial infarction, non-fatal stroke, cardiovascular mortality, and revascularization procedures, using Cox proportional hazards models. PM<sub>2.5</sub> peak exposure was treated as a time-varying variable, and models were adjusted for potential confounders, including individual-level demographic, clinical, and socioeconomic factors. PM<sub>2.5</sub> peaks were defined as monthly average concentrations exceeding the long-term mean by more than two standard deviations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The fully adjusted model showed no significant elevation in the risk of MACE associated with increased PM<sub>2.5</sub> peak exposure (HR = 0.9991, 95 % CI: 0.9974-1.0008). This lack of association was consistent across sensitivity analyses and different peak definitions, including shorter-term peaks in the five and one years preceding an event.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our findings suggest that PM<sub>2.5</sub> peak exposure does not significantly increase the risk of MACE in this Danish population. These results challenge the hypothesis that PM<sub>2.5</sub> peaks over a long period are a determinant of cardiovascular risk. Further research is warranted to explore these relationships in different populations and to investigate potential mechanisms underlying the effects of air pollution peaks on cardiovascular health.</p>","PeriodicalId":15223,"journal":{"name":"Journal of cardiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The role of long-term PM<sub>2.5</sub> peaks in cardiovascular risk: an AIRCARD substudy.\",\"authors\":\"Stephan Peronard Mayntz, Solveig Warncke, Lærke Groth Ladefoged, Roda Abdulkadir Mohamed, Anna Mejldal, Jes Sanddal Lindholt, Axel Cosmus Pyndt Diederichsen, Lise Marie Frohn, Jørgen Brandt, Matthias Ketzel, Jibran Khan, Jess Lambrechtsen\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jjcc.2025.04.012\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Cardiovascular disease is a leading cause of mortality globally, with air pollution, particularly fine particulate matter (PM<sub>2.5</sub>), recognized as a significant risk factor. While long-term accumulated exposure to PM<sub>2.5</sub> has been extensively studied, the impact of PM<sub>2.5</sub> peaks on cardiovascular events remains unexplored.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This prospective cohort study analyzed data from 26,723 male participants aged 65 to 74 years from the Danish DANCAVAS and VIVA screening trials. We assessed the association between long-term cumulated repeated PM<sub>2.5</sub> peak exposure and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), including non-fatal acute myocardial infarction, non-fatal stroke, cardiovascular mortality, and revascularization procedures, using Cox proportional hazards models. PM<sub>2.5</sub> peak exposure was treated as a time-varying variable, and models were adjusted for potential confounders, including individual-level demographic, clinical, and socioeconomic factors. PM<sub>2.5</sub> peaks were defined as monthly average concentrations exceeding the long-term mean by more than two standard deviations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The fully adjusted model showed no significant elevation in the risk of MACE associated with increased PM<sub>2.5</sub> peak exposure (HR = 0.9991, 95 % CI: 0.9974-1.0008). This lack of association was consistent across sensitivity analyses and different peak definitions, including shorter-term peaks in the five and one years preceding an event.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our findings suggest that PM<sub>2.5</sub> peak exposure does not significantly increase the risk of MACE in this Danish population. These results challenge the hypothesis that PM<sub>2.5</sub> peaks over a long period are a determinant of cardiovascular risk. Further research is warranted to explore these relationships in different populations and to investigate potential mechanisms underlying the effects of air pollution peaks on cardiovascular health.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15223,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of cardiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of cardiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jjcc.2025.04.012\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jjcc.2025.04.012","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:心血管疾病是全球死亡的主要原因,空气污染,特别是细颗粒物(PM2.5)被认为是一个重要的危险因素。虽然长期累积暴露于PM2.5已被广泛研究,但PM2.5峰值对心血管事件的影响仍未被探索。方法:这项前瞻性队列研究分析了来自丹麦DANCAVAS和VIVA筛选试验的26,723名年龄在65至74 岁的男性参与者的数据。我们使用Cox比例风险模型评估了长期累积重复PM2.5峰值暴露与主要不良心血管事件(MACE)之间的关系,包括非致死性急性心肌梗死、非致死性卒中、心血管死亡率和血运重建术。PM2.5峰值暴露被视为一个时变变量,并根据潜在的混杂因素对模型进行了调整,包括个人层面的人口统计学、临床和社会经济因素。PM2.5峰值被定义为月平均浓度超过长期平均值两个标准差以上。结果:完全调整后的模型显示PM2.5峰值暴露增加与MACE风险没有显著升高(HR = 0.9991,95 % CI: 0.9974-1.0008)。在敏感性分析和不同的峰值定义中,这种相关性的缺乏是一致的,包括事件发生前5年和1年的短期峰值。结论:我们的研究结果表明,PM2.5峰值暴露不会显著增加丹麦人群中MACE的风险。这些结果挑战了PM2.5长期峰值是心血管风险决定因素的假设。有必要进一步研究在不同人群中探索这些关系,并调查空气污染高峰对心血管健康影响的潜在机制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The role of long-term PM2.5 peaks in cardiovascular risk: an AIRCARD substudy.

Background: Cardiovascular disease is a leading cause of mortality globally, with air pollution, particularly fine particulate matter (PM2.5), recognized as a significant risk factor. While long-term accumulated exposure to PM2.5 has been extensively studied, the impact of PM2.5 peaks on cardiovascular events remains unexplored.

Methods: This prospective cohort study analyzed data from 26,723 male participants aged 65 to 74 years from the Danish DANCAVAS and VIVA screening trials. We assessed the association between long-term cumulated repeated PM2.5 peak exposure and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), including non-fatal acute myocardial infarction, non-fatal stroke, cardiovascular mortality, and revascularization procedures, using Cox proportional hazards models. PM2.5 peak exposure was treated as a time-varying variable, and models were adjusted for potential confounders, including individual-level demographic, clinical, and socioeconomic factors. PM2.5 peaks were defined as monthly average concentrations exceeding the long-term mean by more than two standard deviations.

Results: The fully adjusted model showed no significant elevation in the risk of MACE associated with increased PM2.5 peak exposure (HR = 0.9991, 95 % CI: 0.9974-1.0008). This lack of association was consistent across sensitivity analyses and different peak definitions, including shorter-term peaks in the five and one years preceding an event.

Conclusions: Our findings suggest that PM2.5 peak exposure does not significantly increase the risk of MACE in this Danish population. These results challenge the hypothesis that PM2.5 peaks over a long period are a determinant of cardiovascular risk. Further research is warranted to explore these relationships in different populations and to investigate potential mechanisms underlying the effects of air pollution peaks on cardiovascular health.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of cardiology
Journal of cardiology CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
8.00%
发文量
202
审稿时长
29 days
期刊介绍: The official journal of the Japanese College of Cardiology is an international, English language, peer-reviewed journal publishing the latest findings in cardiovascular medicine. Journal of Cardiology (JC) aims to publish the highest-quality material covering original basic and clinical research on all aspects of cardiovascular disease. Topics covered include ischemic heart disease, cardiomyopathy, valvular heart disease, vascular disease, hypertension, arrhythmia, congenital heart disease, pharmacological and non-pharmacological treatment, new diagnostic techniques, and cardiovascular imaging. JC also publishes a selection of review articles, clinical trials, short communications, and important messages and letters to the editor.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信