安洛替尼加多西紫杉醇与多西紫杉醇单药治疗先前免疫治疗过的NSCLC患者的可行性和安全性:一项回顾性探索性研究

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
International Journal of General Medicine Pub Date : 2025-04-28 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.2147/IJGM.S521360
Da-Wei Li, Ying-Dong Li, Hong Jin
{"title":"安洛替尼加多西紫杉醇与多西紫杉醇单药治疗先前免疫治疗过的NSCLC患者的可行性和安全性:一项回顾性探索性研究","authors":"Da-Wei Li, Ying-Dong Li, Hong Jin","doi":"10.2147/IJGM.S521360","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of anlotinib plus docetaxel in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who have previously treated with immunotherapy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective analysis was conducted on 86 previously immunotherapy-treated patients with advanced NSCLC from December 2018 to October 2024 in clinical practice. Those who received anlotinib plus docetaxel were assigned to experimental group (EG, N=43), while those who were treated with docetaxel monotherapy were deemed as control group (CG, N=43) in clinical practice. Efficacy and safety of both regimens were compared with regular follow-up for survival data collection. The primary endpoints included overall survival (OS) and secondary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>ORR in the experimental and control groups was 30.2% (95% CI: 17.2-46.1%) and 13.9% (95% CI: 5.3-27.9%), respectively, showing a trend towards significance (<i>P</i>=0.069). DCR was significantly higher in the EG at 79.1% (95% CI: 63.9-89.9%) compared to 51.2% (95% CI: 35.5-66.7%) in the CG (<i>P</i>=0.007). After a median follow-up of 12.8 and 8.5 months, respectively, the median PFS was 6.5 months (95% CI: 4.08-8.92) in the EG, compared to 2.9 months (95% CI: 2.53-3.27) in the CG (<i>P</i>=0.019). The median OS was 13.5 months (95% CI: 10.49-16.51) in the EG, compared to 9.2 months (95% CI: 5.73-12.67) in the CG (<i>P</i>=0.007). Adverse events of all grades occurred in 93.0% of patients in the EG and 83.7% in the CG. Grade 3 or above adverse events were detected in 51.2% and 44.2%, respectively, with similar safety profiles between the groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Anlotinib plus docetaxel demonstrated preliminary efficacy and a tolerable safety profile in patients with previously immunotherapy-treated advanced NSCLC, providing a potential therapeutic option in the post-immunotherapy setting. The conclusion should be confirmed in prospective clinical trials subsequently.</p>","PeriodicalId":14131,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of General Medicine","volume":"18 ","pages":"2319-2331"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12048712/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Feasibility and Safety of Anlotinib Plus Docetaxel versus Docetaxel Monotherapy in Patients with Previously Immunotherapy-Treated NSCLC: A Retrospective Exploratory Study.\",\"authors\":\"Da-Wei Li, Ying-Dong Li, Hong Jin\",\"doi\":\"10.2147/IJGM.S521360\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of anlotinib plus docetaxel in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who have previously treated with immunotherapy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective analysis was conducted on 86 previously immunotherapy-treated patients with advanced NSCLC from December 2018 to October 2024 in clinical practice. Those who received anlotinib plus docetaxel were assigned to experimental group (EG, N=43), while those who were treated with docetaxel monotherapy were deemed as control group (CG, N=43) in clinical practice. Efficacy and safety of both regimens were compared with regular follow-up for survival data collection. The primary endpoints included overall survival (OS) and secondary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>ORR in the experimental and control groups was 30.2% (95% CI: 17.2-46.1%) and 13.9% (95% CI: 5.3-27.9%), respectively, showing a trend towards significance (<i>P</i>=0.069). DCR was significantly higher in the EG at 79.1% (95% CI: 63.9-89.9%) compared to 51.2% (95% CI: 35.5-66.7%) in the CG (<i>P</i>=0.007). After a median follow-up of 12.8 and 8.5 months, respectively, the median PFS was 6.5 months (95% CI: 4.08-8.92) in the EG, compared to 2.9 months (95% CI: 2.53-3.27) in the CG (<i>P</i>=0.019). The median OS was 13.5 months (95% CI: 10.49-16.51) in the EG, compared to 9.2 months (95% CI: 5.73-12.67) in the CG (<i>P</i>=0.007). Adverse events of all grades occurred in 93.0% of patients in the EG and 83.7% in the CG. Grade 3 or above adverse events were detected in 51.2% and 44.2%, respectively, with similar safety profiles between the groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Anlotinib plus docetaxel demonstrated preliminary efficacy and a tolerable safety profile in patients with previously immunotherapy-treated advanced NSCLC, providing a potential therapeutic option in the post-immunotherapy setting. The conclusion should be confirmed in prospective clinical trials subsequently.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14131,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of General Medicine\",\"volume\":\"18 \",\"pages\":\"2319-2331\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12048712/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of General Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2147/IJGM.S521360\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of General Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/IJGM.S521360","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究旨在评价安洛替尼联合多西他赛治疗晚期非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)患者的疗效和安全性。方法:回顾性分析2018年12月至2024年10月86例经免疫治疗的晚期非小细胞肺癌患者的临床资料。临床中将接受安洛替尼联合多西他赛治疗的患者作为实验组(EG, N=43),接受多西他赛单药治疗的患者作为对照组(CG, N=43)。通过定期随访收集生存数据,比较两种方案的有效性和安全性。主要终点包括总生存期(OS),次要终点包括无进展生存期(PFS)、客观缓解率(ORR)和疾病控制率(DCR)。结果:实验组和对照组的ORR分别为30.2% (95% CI: 17.2 ~ 46.1%)和13.9% (95% CI: 5.3 ~ 27.9%),有显著性趋势(P=0.069)。EG组的DCR为79.1% (95% CI: 63.9-89.9%),而CG组的DCR为51.2% (95% CI: 35.5-66.7%) (P=0.007)。中位随访时间分别为12.8个月和8.5个月,EG组的中位PFS为6.5个月(95% CI: 4.08-8.92),而CG组为2.9个月(95% CI: 2.53-3.27) (P=0.019)。EG组的中位OS为13.5个月(95% CI: 10.49-16.51),而CG组的中位OS为9.2个月(95% CI: 5.73-12.67) (P=0.007)。EG组93.0%和CG组83.7%的患者发生了所有级别的不良事件。3级及以上不良事件分别为51.2%和44.2%,两组之间的安全性相似。结论:安洛替尼联合多西他赛在先前接受免疫治疗的晚期NSCLC患者中显示出初步疗效和可耐受的安全性,为免疫治疗后的患者提供了一种潜在的治疗选择。该结论需在后续的前瞻性临床试验中得到证实。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Feasibility and Safety of Anlotinib Plus Docetaxel versus Docetaxel Monotherapy in Patients with Previously Immunotherapy-Treated NSCLC: A Retrospective Exploratory Study.

Objective: This study aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of anlotinib plus docetaxel in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who have previously treated with immunotherapy.

Methods: This retrospective analysis was conducted on 86 previously immunotherapy-treated patients with advanced NSCLC from December 2018 to October 2024 in clinical practice. Those who received anlotinib plus docetaxel were assigned to experimental group (EG, N=43), while those who were treated with docetaxel monotherapy were deemed as control group (CG, N=43) in clinical practice. Efficacy and safety of both regimens were compared with regular follow-up for survival data collection. The primary endpoints included overall survival (OS) and secondary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR).

Results: ORR in the experimental and control groups was 30.2% (95% CI: 17.2-46.1%) and 13.9% (95% CI: 5.3-27.9%), respectively, showing a trend towards significance (P=0.069). DCR was significantly higher in the EG at 79.1% (95% CI: 63.9-89.9%) compared to 51.2% (95% CI: 35.5-66.7%) in the CG (P=0.007). After a median follow-up of 12.8 and 8.5 months, respectively, the median PFS was 6.5 months (95% CI: 4.08-8.92) in the EG, compared to 2.9 months (95% CI: 2.53-3.27) in the CG (P=0.019). The median OS was 13.5 months (95% CI: 10.49-16.51) in the EG, compared to 9.2 months (95% CI: 5.73-12.67) in the CG (P=0.007). Adverse events of all grades occurred in 93.0% of patients in the EG and 83.7% in the CG. Grade 3 or above adverse events were detected in 51.2% and 44.2%, respectively, with similar safety profiles between the groups.

Conclusion: Anlotinib plus docetaxel demonstrated preliminary efficacy and a tolerable safety profile in patients with previously immunotherapy-treated advanced NSCLC, providing a potential therapeutic option in the post-immunotherapy setting. The conclusion should be confirmed in prospective clinical trials subsequently.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of General Medicine
International Journal of General Medicine Medicine-General Medicine
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1113
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal of General Medicine is an international, peer-reviewed, open access journal that focuses on general and internal medicine, pathogenesis, epidemiology, diagnosis, monitoring and treatment protocols. The journal is characterized by the rapid reporting of reviews, original research and clinical studies across all disease areas. A key focus of the journal is the elucidation of disease processes and management protocols resulting in improved outcomes for the patient. Patient perspectives such as satisfaction, quality of life, health literacy and communication and their role in developing new healthcare programs and optimizing clinical outcomes are major areas of interest for the journal. As of 1st April 2019, the International Journal of General Medicine will no longer consider meta-analyses for publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信