足部和踝关节手术前足和中足关节融合术后恢复运动和体力活动的回顾性比较。

Seif El Masry, Grace M DiGiovanni, Allison L Boden, Aoife MacMahon, Scott J Ellis
{"title":"足部和踝关节手术前足和中足关节融合术后恢复运动和体力活动的回顾性比较。","authors":"Seif El Masry, Grace M DiGiovanni, Allison L Boden, Aoife MacMahon, Scott J Ellis","doi":"10.1177/19386400251333045","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BackgroundPhysical activity and returning to sports are vital for athletes after foot and ankle surgery. While joint preservation is preferred, joint arthrodesis becomes necessary in certain injuries or deformities. Common procedures include Lisfranc arthrodesis, modified Lapidus for hallux valgus (HV), and first metatarsophalangeal (MTP) arthrodesis for hallux rigidus (HR), addressing pain and deformities. Prior studies show promising outcomes individually, yet lack comparisons. Thus, this retrospective study aims to compare clinical outcomes and return to sports in the 3 procedure groups.MethodsBetween 2006 and 2014, a total of 48 modified Lapidus procedures for HV, 38 Lisfranc injuries, and 50 MTP fusion for HR cases were assessed regarding their physical activity and return to sport, utilizing sports-specific, patient-administered questionnaires. Clinical outcomes were evaluated through the Foot and Ankle Outcome Score (FAOS), encompassing pain, symptoms, stiffness, daily function, sports function, and quality of life. Comparisons between these groups were made based on these survey outcomes.ResultsRegarding FAOS scores, the 3 surgery groups revealed no significant differences in outcomes for the Pain subscale (P = .07). However, significant differences were observed among the 3 groups in each of the other domains (all P < .05). These differences were due to the MTP fusion having poorer FAOS scores as the Lisfranc and Lapidus groups had no differences in all domains (all P > .05). The MTP Fusion group showed comparable outcomes regarding return to sports and physical activity despite the lower FAOS scores.ConclusionMTP Fusion patients exhibited poorer FAOS scores compared with those undergoing modified Lapidus and Lisfranc procedures. However, despite this disparity they demonstrated a high rate of return to sports suggesting that alongside partial midfoot arthrodesis for Lisfranc injuries and modified Lapidus procedure for HV, first MTP joint arthrodesis for HR represents a reliable option for young athletes.Level of Evidence:Level III, comparative series.</p>","PeriodicalId":73046,"journal":{"name":"Foot & ankle specialist","volume":" ","pages":"19386400251333045"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Retrospective Comparison of Return to Sports and Physical Activity After Forefoot and Midfoot Arthrodesis Procedures in Foot and Ankle Surgery.\",\"authors\":\"Seif El Masry, Grace M DiGiovanni, Allison L Boden, Aoife MacMahon, Scott J Ellis\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/19386400251333045\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>BackgroundPhysical activity and returning to sports are vital for athletes after foot and ankle surgery. While joint preservation is preferred, joint arthrodesis becomes necessary in certain injuries or deformities. Common procedures include Lisfranc arthrodesis, modified Lapidus for hallux valgus (HV), and first metatarsophalangeal (MTP) arthrodesis for hallux rigidus (HR), addressing pain and deformities. Prior studies show promising outcomes individually, yet lack comparisons. Thus, this retrospective study aims to compare clinical outcomes and return to sports in the 3 procedure groups.MethodsBetween 2006 and 2014, a total of 48 modified Lapidus procedures for HV, 38 Lisfranc injuries, and 50 MTP fusion for HR cases were assessed regarding their physical activity and return to sport, utilizing sports-specific, patient-administered questionnaires. Clinical outcomes were evaluated through the Foot and Ankle Outcome Score (FAOS), encompassing pain, symptoms, stiffness, daily function, sports function, and quality of life. Comparisons between these groups were made based on these survey outcomes.ResultsRegarding FAOS scores, the 3 surgery groups revealed no significant differences in outcomes for the Pain subscale (P = .07). However, significant differences were observed among the 3 groups in each of the other domains (all P < .05). These differences were due to the MTP fusion having poorer FAOS scores as the Lisfranc and Lapidus groups had no differences in all domains (all P > .05). The MTP Fusion group showed comparable outcomes regarding return to sports and physical activity despite the lower FAOS scores.ConclusionMTP Fusion patients exhibited poorer FAOS scores compared with those undergoing modified Lapidus and Lisfranc procedures. However, despite this disparity they demonstrated a high rate of return to sports suggesting that alongside partial midfoot arthrodesis for Lisfranc injuries and modified Lapidus procedure for HV, first MTP joint arthrodesis for HR represents a reliable option for young athletes.Level of Evidence:Level III, comparative series.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73046,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Foot & ankle specialist\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"19386400251333045\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Foot & ankle specialist\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/19386400251333045\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Foot & ankle specialist","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/19386400251333045","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

体育活动和重返运动对运动员在脚部和踝关节手术后至关重要。虽然关节保留是首选,但在某些损伤或畸形中,关节融合术是必要的。常见的手术包括Lisfranc关节融合术,改良Lapidus关节融合术治疗拇外翻(HV),以及第一跖趾(MTP)关节融合术治疗拇僵硬(HR),以解决疼痛和畸形。先前的研究显示了有希望的结果,但缺乏比较。因此,本回顾性研究旨在比较三个手术组的临床结果和恢复运动。方法:在2006年至2014年期间,共对48例HV的改良Lapidus手术、38例Lisfranc损伤和50例HR病例的MTP融合进行了评估,评估了他们的身体活动和运动恢复情况,采用了针对运动的、患者自行填写的问卷。通过足踝预后评分(FAOS)评估临床结果,包括疼痛、症状、僵硬、日常功能、运动功能和生活质量。这些组之间的比较是基于这些调查结果。结果在FAOS评分方面,3个手术组在疼痛亚量表结果上无显著差异(P = 0.07)。3组间其他各域差异均有统计学意义(P < 0.05)。这些差异是由于MTP融合具有较差的FAOS评分,因为Lisfranc组和Lapidus组在所有域均无差异(均P < 0.05)。尽管FAOS得分较低,但MTP融合组在恢复运动和身体活动方面显示出可比的结果。结论与改良Lapidus和Lisfranc手术相比,mtp融合患者的FAOS评分较低。然而,尽管存在这种差异,但他们显示出高的运动恢复率,这表明除了针对Lisfranc损伤的部分中足关节融合术和针对HV的改良Lapidus手术外,针对HR的首次MTP关节融合术是年轻运动员的可靠选择。证据等级:III级,比较系列。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Retrospective Comparison of Return to Sports and Physical Activity After Forefoot and Midfoot Arthrodesis Procedures in Foot and Ankle Surgery.

BackgroundPhysical activity and returning to sports are vital for athletes after foot and ankle surgery. While joint preservation is preferred, joint arthrodesis becomes necessary in certain injuries or deformities. Common procedures include Lisfranc arthrodesis, modified Lapidus for hallux valgus (HV), and first metatarsophalangeal (MTP) arthrodesis for hallux rigidus (HR), addressing pain and deformities. Prior studies show promising outcomes individually, yet lack comparisons. Thus, this retrospective study aims to compare clinical outcomes and return to sports in the 3 procedure groups.MethodsBetween 2006 and 2014, a total of 48 modified Lapidus procedures for HV, 38 Lisfranc injuries, and 50 MTP fusion for HR cases were assessed regarding their physical activity and return to sport, utilizing sports-specific, patient-administered questionnaires. Clinical outcomes were evaluated through the Foot and Ankle Outcome Score (FAOS), encompassing pain, symptoms, stiffness, daily function, sports function, and quality of life. Comparisons between these groups were made based on these survey outcomes.ResultsRegarding FAOS scores, the 3 surgery groups revealed no significant differences in outcomes for the Pain subscale (P = .07). However, significant differences were observed among the 3 groups in each of the other domains (all P < .05). These differences were due to the MTP fusion having poorer FAOS scores as the Lisfranc and Lapidus groups had no differences in all domains (all P > .05). The MTP Fusion group showed comparable outcomes regarding return to sports and physical activity despite the lower FAOS scores.ConclusionMTP Fusion patients exhibited poorer FAOS scores compared with those undergoing modified Lapidus and Lisfranc procedures. However, despite this disparity they demonstrated a high rate of return to sports suggesting that alongside partial midfoot arthrodesis for Lisfranc injuries and modified Lapidus procedure for HV, first MTP joint arthrodesis for HR represents a reliable option for young athletes.Level of Evidence:Level III, comparative series.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信