超声小梁切除术与超声乳化术对屈光结果的影响——一项前瞻性观察研究。

Subashini Kaliaperumal, Krishin K, Mary Stephen, Jayasri P
{"title":"超声小梁切除术与超声乳化术对屈光结果的影响——一项前瞻性观察研究。","authors":"Subashini Kaliaperumal, Krishin K, Mary Stephen, Jayasri P","doi":"10.22336/rjo.2025.14","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To compare the refractive outcomes of phaco-trabeculectomy versus phacoemulsification.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This prospective observational study included 75 eyes, 42 eyes with cataract and glaucoma that underwent phaco-trabeculectomy, and 33 eyes with cataract that underwent phacoemulsification. The primary outcome measures were the assessment of mean prediction refractive error and absolute mean prediction refractive error, measured during biometry with a target refraction of more than -1 diopter.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean age of the study population was 60.3 ± 4.5 years (SD) in the phaco trabeculectomy group (Group 1) and 64.24 ± 3.2 years (SD) in the phacoemulsification group (Group 2). The mean prediction error in group 1 was -0.21 + 0.88 diopters, and in group 2, it was -0.24 + 1.42 diopters, with absolute mean prediction errors of 0.72 + 0.68 diopters in group 1 and 0.71 + 0.97 diopters in group 2. A statistically significant shift in myopic and hyperopic prediction error was noted for 0 to 1 diopter, and a change above one diopter was not substantial.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>This discussion examines the challenges associated with refractive outcomes following combined cataract and glaucoma filtration surgery. The study found considerable variability in achieving the target refraction, with prediction errors generally within one diopter, consistent with other research. The study's limitations, including a short follow-up period and variations in surgical techniques, are acknowledged as possible factors that may contribute to refractive errors and astigmatism.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The predicted refractive errors in both groups were similar, with equal myopic and hyperopic shifts noted, and a statistically significant change was observed from 0 to 1 diopter.</p>","PeriodicalId":94355,"journal":{"name":"Romanian journal of ophthalmology","volume":"69 1","pages":"83-87"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12049651/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of Phaco-trabeculectomy versus Phacoemulsification on Refractive Outcome - A Prospective Observational Study.\",\"authors\":\"Subashini Kaliaperumal, Krishin K, Mary Stephen, Jayasri P\",\"doi\":\"10.22336/rjo.2025.14\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To compare the refractive outcomes of phaco-trabeculectomy versus phacoemulsification.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This prospective observational study included 75 eyes, 42 eyes with cataract and glaucoma that underwent phaco-trabeculectomy, and 33 eyes with cataract that underwent phacoemulsification. The primary outcome measures were the assessment of mean prediction refractive error and absolute mean prediction refractive error, measured during biometry with a target refraction of more than -1 diopter.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean age of the study population was 60.3 ± 4.5 years (SD) in the phaco trabeculectomy group (Group 1) and 64.24 ± 3.2 years (SD) in the phacoemulsification group (Group 2). The mean prediction error in group 1 was -0.21 + 0.88 diopters, and in group 2, it was -0.24 + 1.42 diopters, with absolute mean prediction errors of 0.72 + 0.68 diopters in group 1 and 0.71 + 0.97 diopters in group 2. A statistically significant shift in myopic and hyperopic prediction error was noted for 0 to 1 diopter, and a change above one diopter was not substantial.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>This discussion examines the challenges associated with refractive outcomes following combined cataract and glaucoma filtration surgery. The study found considerable variability in achieving the target refraction, with prediction errors generally within one diopter, consistent with other research. The study's limitations, including a short follow-up period and variations in surgical techniques, are acknowledged as possible factors that may contribute to refractive errors and astigmatism.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The predicted refractive errors in both groups were similar, with equal myopic and hyperopic shifts noted, and a statistically significant change was observed from 0 to 1 diopter.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94355,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Romanian journal of ophthalmology\",\"volume\":\"69 1\",\"pages\":\"83-87\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12049651/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Romanian journal of ophthalmology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.22336/rjo.2025.14\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Romanian journal of ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22336/rjo.2025.14","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:比较晶状体小梁切除术与晶状体乳化术的屈光效果。方法:本前瞻性观察研究纳入75只眼,42只白内障和青光眼行晶状体小梁切除术,33只白内障行晶状体乳化术。主要结局指标是评估平均预测屈光不正和绝对平均预测屈光不正,在目标屈光度大于-1屈光度的生物测量中测量。结果:研究人群的平均年龄:超声小梁切除术组(组1)为60.3±4.5岁,超声乳化术组(组2)为64.24±3.2岁。组1的平均预测误差为-0.21 + 0.88屈光度,组2的平均预测误差为-0.24 + 1.42屈光度,组1的绝对平均预测误差为0.72 + 0.68屈光度,组2的绝对平均预测误差为0.71 + 0.97屈光度。在0到1屈光度范围内,近视和远视的预测误差有统计学意义的变化,1屈光度以上的变化不显著。讨论:本讨论探讨与白内障和青光眼联合滤过手术后屈光结果相关的挑战。该研究发现,在实现目标折射方面存在相当大的差异,预测误差通常在一个屈光度以内,这与其他研究结果一致。这项研究的局限性,包括随访时间短和手术技术的变化,被认为是可能导致屈光不正和散光的因素。结论:两组患者的预测屈光不全相似,近视和远视偏移相同,且0 ~ 1屈光不全变化具有统计学意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effect of Phaco-trabeculectomy versus Phacoemulsification on Refractive Outcome - A Prospective Observational Study.

Purpose: To compare the refractive outcomes of phaco-trabeculectomy versus phacoemulsification.

Methods: This prospective observational study included 75 eyes, 42 eyes with cataract and glaucoma that underwent phaco-trabeculectomy, and 33 eyes with cataract that underwent phacoemulsification. The primary outcome measures were the assessment of mean prediction refractive error and absolute mean prediction refractive error, measured during biometry with a target refraction of more than -1 diopter.

Results: The mean age of the study population was 60.3 ± 4.5 years (SD) in the phaco trabeculectomy group (Group 1) and 64.24 ± 3.2 years (SD) in the phacoemulsification group (Group 2). The mean prediction error in group 1 was -0.21 + 0.88 diopters, and in group 2, it was -0.24 + 1.42 diopters, with absolute mean prediction errors of 0.72 + 0.68 diopters in group 1 and 0.71 + 0.97 diopters in group 2. A statistically significant shift in myopic and hyperopic prediction error was noted for 0 to 1 diopter, and a change above one diopter was not substantial.

Discussion: This discussion examines the challenges associated with refractive outcomes following combined cataract and glaucoma filtration surgery. The study found considerable variability in achieving the target refraction, with prediction errors generally within one diopter, consistent with other research. The study's limitations, including a short follow-up period and variations in surgical techniques, are acknowledged as possible factors that may contribute to refractive errors and astigmatism.

Conclusions: The predicted refractive errors in both groups were similar, with equal myopic and hyperopic shifts noted, and a statistically significant change was observed from 0 to 1 diopter.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信