Cellular Metabolomics Reveals Differences in the Scope of Liver Protection Between Ammonium-Based Glycyrrhizinate and Magnesium Isoglycyrrhizinate.

Background: Despite the well-established liver-protective efficacy of monoammonium glycyrrhizinate (MONO), diammonium glycyrrhizinate (DIAM), and magnesium isoglycyrrhizinate (MAGN), which has been translated into clinical practice, their clinical differentiation remains elusive owing to their structural similarities and overlapping therapeutic effects. Methods: The present study delves into the pharmacokinetics, cellular-level liver-protective potencies, and underlying mechanisms of action of these three compounds through a comprehensive analysis. Results: The findings reveal that both DIAM and MAGN exhibit superior bioavailability and hepatoprotective profiles compared to MONO. Notably, an investigation of the metabolic pathways mediating liver protection in normal human liver cells (LO2), utilizing an ultra-performance liquid chromatography-time of flight tandem mass spectrometry (UPLC-TOF-MS/MSe) platform, demonstrated that MAGN augments antioxidant components, thereby favoring its application in drug-induced liver injury (DILI). Conversely, DIAM appears to be a more suitable candidate for addressing non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) and viral hepatitis. Conclusion: This study contributes novel perspectives on the mechanisms of action and potential clinical utilities of DIAM and MAGN in liver disease prevention and management.