皮肤弹性计测量下肢肿瘤相关性水肿患者皮肤力学特性的信度和效度。

Yudai Fujimoto, Yoshimi Yuri, Miki Fujii, Yuji Kato, Shota Kinoshita, Yurika Tsujimoto, Reina Kato, Atsuko Nodomi, Emiko Matsumoto, Hironari Tamiya
{"title":"皮肤弹性计测量下肢肿瘤相关性水肿患者皮肤力学特性的信度和效度。","authors":"Yudai Fujimoto, Yoshimi Yuri, Miki Fujii, Yuji Kato, Shota Kinoshita, Yurika Tsujimoto, Reina Kato, Atsuko Nodomi, Emiko Matsumoto, Hironari Tamiya","doi":"10.1589/jpts.37.215","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>[Purpose] This study aimed to clarify the reliability and validity of a skin elasticity meter for evaluating the skin mechanical properties. [Participants and Methods] We conducted a prospective observational study using data from 35 patients diagnosed with unilateral lower extremity edema caused by cancer-related. We evaluated the skin's mechanical properties (relative parameter; R0, distensibility; R2, gross elasticity; R5, net elasticity; R6, viscoelasticity; R7, biological elasticity) of the thigh and lower leg using a skin elasticity meter. Intra-rater reliability was calculated using interclass correlation (ICC). Validity was also examined by comparing the edema and non-edema sides of the data obtained using a skin elasticity meter and correlating them with the circumferential diameter difference. [Results] ICC values ranged from 0.787 to 0.997 for each site. A significant difference in skin mechanical properties (offset + R0, R2, R6, and R7) of the upper extremities was observed between the lymphedema and non-lymphedema groups. A correlation was found between the R0 + offset between the R0 + offset parameter and the difference in circumference. [Conclusion] This study suggested that the skin elasticity meter is a reliable and valid method for evaluating the mechanical properties of the skin in patients with lower extremity cancer-related edema.</p>","PeriodicalId":16834,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Physical Therapy Science","volume":"37 5","pages":"215-220"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12045608/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reliability and validity of skin elasticity meter to measure skin mechanical properties in patients with lower extremity cancer-related edema.\",\"authors\":\"Yudai Fujimoto, Yoshimi Yuri, Miki Fujii, Yuji Kato, Shota Kinoshita, Yurika Tsujimoto, Reina Kato, Atsuko Nodomi, Emiko Matsumoto, Hironari Tamiya\",\"doi\":\"10.1589/jpts.37.215\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>[Purpose] This study aimed to clarify the reliability and validity of a skin elasticity meter for evaluating the skin mechanical properties. [Participants and Methods] We conducted a prospective observational study using data from 35 patients diagnosed with unilateral lower extremity edema caused by cancer-related. We evaluated the skin's mechanical properties (relative parameter; R0, distensibility; R2, gross elasticity; R5, net elasticity; R6, viscoelasticity; R7, biological elasticity) of the thigh and lower leg using a skin elasticity meter. Intra-rater reliability was calculated using interclass correlation (ICC). Validity was also examined by comparing the edema and non-edema sides of the data obtained using a skin elasticity meter and correlating them with the circumferential diameter difference. [Results] ICC values ranged from 0.787 to 0.997 for each site. A significant difference in skin mechanical properties (offset + R0, R2, R6, and R7) of the upper extremities was observed between the lymphedema and non-lymphedema groups. A correlation was found between the R0 + offset between the R0 + offset parameter and the difference in circumference. [Conclusion] This study suggested that the skin elasticity meter is a reliable and valid method for evaluating the mechanical properties of the skin in patients with lower extremity cancer-related edema.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16834,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Physical Therapy Science\",\"volume\":\"37 5\",\"pages\":\"215-220\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12045608/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Physical Therapy Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1589/jpts.37.215\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Physical Therapy Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1589/jpts.37.215","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

【目的】本研究旨在阐明皮肤弹性计用于评估皮肤力学性能的信度和效度。[参与者和方法]我们对35例诊断为单侧下肢水肿的癌症相关患者进行了前瞻性观察研究。我们评估了皮肤的力学性能(相对参数;R0、膨胀性;R2,总弹性;R5,净弹性;R6,粘弹性;R7,生物弹性)的大腿和小腿使用皮肤弹性计。用类间相关(ICC)计算了类内信度。通过比较使用皮肤弹性计获得的水肿和非水肿侧数据,并将其与周径差相关联,还检验了有效性。[结果]各位点ICC值范围为0.787 ~ 0.997。淋巴水肿组和非淋巴水肿组上肢皮肤力学特性(偏移+ R0、R2、R6和R7)有显著差异。R0 +偏移量参数与周长差之间存在相关性。【结论】本研究提示皮肤弹性仪是评估下肢肿瘤相关性水肿患者皮肤力学性能的一种可靠有效的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Reliability and validity of skin elasticity meter to measure skin mechanical properties in patients with lower extremity cancer-related edema.

[Purpose] This study aimed to clarify the reliability and validity of a skin elasticity meter for evaluating the skin mechanical properties. [Participants and Methods] We conducted a prospective observational study using data from 35 patients diagnosed with unilateral lower extremity edema caused by cancer-related. We evaluated the skin's mechanical properties (relative parameter; R0, distensibility; R2, gross elasticity; R5, net elasticity; R6, viscoelasticity; R7, biological elasticity) of the thigh and lower leg using a skin elasticity meter. Intra-rater reliability was calculated using interclass correlation (ICC). Validity was also examined by comparing the edema and non-edema sides of the data obtained using a skin elasticity meter and correlating them with the circumferential diameter difference. [Results] ICC values ranged from 0.787 to 0.997 for each site. A significant difference in skin mechanical properties (offset + R0, R2, R6, and R7) of the upper extremities was observed between the lymphedema and non-lymphedema groups. A correlation was found between the R0 + offset between the R0 + offset parameter and the difference in circumference. [Conclusion] This study suggested that the skin elasticity meter is a reliable and valid method for evaluating the mechanical properties of the skin in patients with lower extremity cancer-related edema.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
137
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信