MRI-US融合前列腺活检时代灰色区PSA和PSAD与PIRADS v2.1相关分析:一项回顾性双中心研究。

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Michelangelo S Cobangbang, Bryian P Paner, Jerome Kyle R San Jose, Miguel Antonio D Isada, Paul Anthony L Sunga
{"title":"MRI-US融合前列腺活检时代灰色区PSA和PSAD与PIRADS v2.1相关分析:一项回顾性双中心研究。","authors":"Michelangelo S Cobangbang, Bryian P Paner, Jerome Kyle R San Jose, Miguel Antonio D Isada, Paul Anthony L Sunga","doi":"10.1007/s11255-025-04551-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Multiple parameters including PSA, PSAD, and PIRADS v2.1 score, are being associated in an effort to increase the overall detection rate of clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa). This study aims to explore gray zone PSA and PSAD correlated with PIRADS score in the detection of csPCa using MRI-US fusion prostate biopsy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Men with PSA of 4-10 who underwent prostate multiparametric MRI of the prostate (mpMRI) were divided into two groups (4-< 7 and ≥ 7-10 ng/mL) and according to PSA density (< 0.10, 0.10-0.20 and > 0.20). Subgroups according to PIRADS score were made for each group. Chi-square test was utilized for analysing the comparison of histopathology results between the PSA and PSA density subgroups per PIRADS lesion category. Using receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curves, the diagnostic accuracy of PSA and PSAD in identifying csPCa were evaluated, and the best cutoff values were identified.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall detection rate of csPCa was 40.4% (146/361) in the cohort of men with gray zone PSA value. Clinically significant difference in csPCa detection rate was observed in the PSAD subgroups (p =  < 0.001) while no significant difference was observed in the two groups of PSA (p = 0.387). On subgroup analysis, only the PSAD subcategories of PIRADS 4 and 5 showed significant difference (p = 0.028 and p = 0.003, respectively). Based on the ROC curve, the optimal cutoff for PSA was 6.32 with sensitivity and specificity of 65.1% and 43.3%, respectively [AUC 0.54 (0.48-0.60)]. PSAD optimal cutoff was 0.139 with sensitivity and specificity of 80.8% and 49.3%, respectively [AUC 0.67 (0.61-0.72)].</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>PSA and PSAD combined with PIRADS v2.1 provide more diagnostic value than when used alone and can be used to counsel men who will undergo MRI-US fusion biopsy. In the gray zone, PSAD is a more reliable diagnostic predictor of csPCa than PSA.</p>","PeriodicalId":14454,"journal":{"name":"International Urology and Nephrology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Analysis of gray zone PSA and PSAD correlated with PIRADS v2.1 in the MRI-US fusion prostate biopsy era: a retrospective bi-centre study.\",\"authors\":\"Michelangelo S Cobangbang, Bryian P Paner, Jerome Kyle R San Jose, Miguel Antonio D Isada, Paul Anthony L Sunga\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11255-025-04551-w\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Multiple parameters including PSA, PSAD, and PIRADS v2.1 score, are being associated in an effort to increase the overall detection rate of clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa). This study aims to explore gray zone PSA and PSAD correlated with PIRADS score in the detection of csPCa using MRI-US fusion prostate biopsy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Men with PSA of 4-10 who underwent prostate multiparametric MRI of the prostate (mpMRI) were divided into two groups (4-< 7 and ≥ 7-10 ng/mL) and according to PSA density (< 0.10, 0.10-0.20 and > 0.20). Subgroups according to PIRADS score were made for each group. Chi-square test was utilized for analysing the comparison of histopathology results between the PSA and PSA density subgroups per PIRADS lesion category. Using receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curves, the diagnostic accuracy of PSA and PSAD in identifying csPCa were evaluated, and the best cutoff values were identified.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall detection rate of csPCa was 40.4% (146/361) in the cohort of men with gray zone PSA value. Clinically significant difference in csPCa detection rate was observed in the PSAD subgroups (p =  < 0.001) while no significant difference was observed in the two groups of PSA (p = 0.387). On subgroup analysis, only the PSAD subcategories of PIRADS 4 and 5 showed significant difference (p = 0.028 and p = 0.003, respectively). Based on the ROC curve, the optimal cutoff for PSA was 6.32 with sensitivity and specificity of 65.1% and 43.3%, respectively [AUC 0.54 (0.48-0.60)]. PSAD optimal cutoff was 0.139 with sensitivity and specificity of 80.8% and 49.3%, respectively [AUC 0.67 (0.61-0.72)].</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>PSA and PSAD combined with PIRADS v2.1 provide more diagnostic value than when used alone and can be used to counsel men who will undergo MRI-US fusion biopsy. In the gray zone, PSAD is a more reliable diagnostic predictor of csPCa than PSA.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14454,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Urology and Nephrology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Urology and Nephrology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11255-025-04551-w\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Urology and Nephrology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11255-025-04551-w","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:为了提高临床显著性前列腺癌(csPCa)的总体检出率,包括PSA、PSAD和PIRADS v2.1评分在内的多个参数正在被关联起来。本研究旨在探讨MRI-US融合前列腺活检检测csPCa时灰色区PSA和PSAD与PIRADS评分的相关性。方法:PSA为4 ~ 10的男性行前列腺多参数MRI检查(mpMRI)分为2组(4 ~ 0.20)。根据PIRADS评分对各组进行分组。采用卡方检验分析各PIRADS病变类别PSA与PSA密度亚组间组织病理学结果的比较。采用受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线,评价PSA和PSAD对csPCa的诊断准确性,并确定最佳临界值。结果:PSA灰色区男性人群csPCa总检出率为40.4%(146/361)。结论:PSA和PSAD联合PIRADS v2.1比单独使用更有诊断价值,可用于建议接受MRI-US融合活检的男性。在灰色地带,PSAD是比PSA更可靠的csPCa诊断预测因子。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Analysis of gray zone PSA and PSAD correlated with PIRADS v2.1 in the MRI-US fusion prostate biopsy era: a retrospective bi-centre study.

Background: Multiple parameters including PSA, PSAD, and PIRADS v2.1 score, are being associated in an effort to increase the overall detection rate of clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa). This study aims to explore gray zone PSA and PSAD correlated with PIRADS score in the detection of csPCa using MRI-US fusion prostate biopsy.

Methods: Men with PSA of 4-10 who underwent prostate multiparametric MRI of the prostate (mpMRI) were divided into two groups (4-< 7 and ≥ 7-10 ng/mL) and according to PSA density (< 0.10, 0.10-0.20 and > 0.20). Subgroups according to PIRADS score were made for each group. Chi-square test was utilized for analysing the comparison of histopathology results between the PSA and PSA density subgroups per PIRADS lesion category. Using receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curves, the diagnostic accuracy of PSA and PSAD in identifying csPCa were evaluated, and the best cutoff values were identified.

Results: Overall detection rate of csPCa was 40.4% (146/361) in the cohort of men with gray zone PSA value. Clinically significant difference in csPCa detection rate was observed in the PSAD subgroups (p =  < 0.001) while no significant difference was observed in the two groups of PSA (p = 0.387). On subgroup analysis, only the PSAD subcategories of PIRADS 4 and 5 showed significant difference (p = 0.028 and p = 0.003, respectively). Based on the ROC curve, the optimal cutoff for PSA was 6.32 with sensitivity and specificity of 65.1% and 43.3%, respectively [AUC 0.54 (0.48-0.60)]. PSAD optimal cutoff was 0.139 with sensitivity and specificity of 80.8% and 49.3%, respectively [AUC 0.67 (0.61-0.72)].

Conclusions: PSA and PSAD combined with PIRADS v2.1 provide more diagnostic value than when used alone and can be used to counsel men who will undergo MRI-US fusion biopsy. In the gray zone, PSAD is a more reliable diagnostic predictor of csPCa than PSA.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International Urology and Nephrology
International Urology and Nephrology 医学-泌尿学与肾脏学
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
5.00%
发文量
329
审稿时长
1.7 months
期刊介绍: International Urology and Nephrology publishes original papers on a broad range of topics in urology, nephrology and andrology. The journal integrates papers originating from clinical practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信