Rutherford 3-6级患者股腘动脉病变联合巧克力药物包覆球囊治疗

IF 2.4 4区 医学 Q3 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE
Xinyi Gao, Lianrui Guo, Xixiang Gao, Jianming Guo, Shijun Cui, Zhu Tong, Yongquan Gu
{"title":"Rutherford 3-6级患者股腘动脉病变联合巧克力药物包覆球囊治疗","authors":"Xinyi Gao, Lianrui Guo, Xixiang Gao, Jianming Guo, Shijun Cui, Zhu Tong, Yongquan Gu","doi":"10.1024/0301-1526/a001196","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b></b> <i>Background:</i> To investigate the efficacy of Chocolate balloon use as an adjunct to drug-coated balloon (DCB) angioplasty for the treatment of femoropopliteal lesions. <i>Patients and methods:</i> This retrospective study was performed with a 12-month follow-up period. The rate of flow-limiting dissection, primary patency, rate and length of bailout stenting, and freedom from major adverse limb events (MALEs) were compared between femoropopliteal lesions treated with plain balloons (PBs) and those treated with Chocolate balloons combined with DCB angioplasty. <i>Results:</i> In total, 192 patients (197 de-novo lesions) were included: 137 patients (141 lesions) in the PB group and 55 patients (56 lesions) in the Chocolate balloon group. The mean total lesion lengths were 126.84±71.57 and 138.39±65.35 mm (P=0.297), more than half of patients had chronic total occlusion (53.2% and 51.8%, P=0.859), the rates of flow-limiting dissection were 15.6% and 12.5% (P=0.579). Rates of primary patency were 88.1% and 92.6%, respectively. Chocolate balloon use reduced the mean total bailout stenting length (135.17±68.85 vs. 98.24±36.78 mm, P=0.022), including in complex lesions (180±70.43 vs. 102.50±44.64 mm, P=0.011), and the absolute bailout stenting length (total bailout stenting/lesion length ratio; 0.74±0.24 vs. 0.48±0.19, P=0.017). <i>Conclusions:</i> Relative to PB, Chocolate balloon use combined with DCB angioplasty did not show a significant advantage. It did, however, reduce the absolute total bailout stenting length in complex lesions.</p>","PeriodicalId":23528,"journal":{"name":"Vasa-european Journal of Vascular Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"265-272"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Combined chocolate drug-coatedballoon treatment of femoropopliteal artery lesions in patients with Rutherford Grade 3-6.\",\"authors\":\"Xinyi Gao, Lianrui Guo, Xixiang Gao, Jianming Guo, Shijun Cui, Zhu Tong, Yongquan Gu\",\"doi\":\"10.1024/0301-1526/a001196\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b></b> <i>Background:</i> To investigate the efficacy of Chocolate balloon use as an adjunct to drug-coated balloon (DCB) angioplasty for the treatment of femoropopliteal lesions. <i>Patients and methods:</i> This retrospective study was performed with a 12-month follow-up period. The rate of flow-limiting dissection, primary patency, rate and length of bailout stenting, and freedom from major adverse limb events (MALEs) were compared between femoropopliteal lesions treated with plain balloons (PBs) and those treated with Chocolate balloons combined with DCB angioplasty. <i>Results:</i> In total, 192 patients (197 de-novo lesions) were included: 137 patients (141 lesions) in the PB group and 55 patients (56 lesions) in the Chocolate balloon group. The mean total lesion lengths were 126.84±71.57 and 138.39±65.35 mm (P=0.297), more than half of patients had chronic total occlusion (53.2% and 51.8%, P=0.859), the rates of flow-limiting dissection were 15.6% and 12.5% (P=0.579). Rates of primary patency were 88.1% and 92.6%, respectively. Chocolate balloon use reduced the mean total bailout stenting length (135.17±68.85 vs. 98.24±36.78 mm, P=0.022), including in complex lesions (180±70.43 vs. 102.50±44.64 mm, P=0.011), and the absolute bailout stenting length (total bailout stenting/lesion length ratio; 0.74±0.24 vs. 0.48±0.19, P=0.017). <i>Conclusions:</i> Relative to PB, Chocolate balloon use combined with DCB angioplasty did not show a significant advantage. It did, however, reduce the absolute total bailout stenting length in complex lesions.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23528,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Vasa-european Journal of Vascular Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"265-272\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Vasa-european Journal of Vascular Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1024/0301-1526/a001196\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/4/14 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vasa-european Journal of Vascular Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1024/0301-1526/a001196","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:探讨巧克力球囊作为药物包被球囊(DCB)血管成形术辅助治疗股腘动脉病变的疗效。患者和方法:本研究为回顾性研究,随访12个月。比较了普通球囊(PBs)和巧克力球囊联合DCB血管成形术治疗股腘动脉病变的局限性夹层率、原发性通畅率、救助支架置放率和长度,以及主要肢体不良事件的自由(男性)。结果:共纳入192例患者(197例新生病变),PB组137例(141个病变),巧克力球囊组55例(56个病变)。平均病变总长度分别为126.84±71.57 mm和138.39±65.35 mm (P=0.297),半数以上患者存在慢性全闭塞(53.2%和51.8%,P=0.859),局限性夹层发生率分别为15.6%和12.5% (P=0.579)。原发性通畅率分别为88.1%和92.6%。巧克力球囊的使用减少了平均支架术总长度(135.17±68.85 vs. 98.24±36.78 mm, P=0.022),包括复杂病变(180±70.43 vs. 102.50±44.64 mm, P=0.011)和绝对支架术总长度(支架术总长度/病变长度比;0.74±0.24 vs. 0.48±0.19,P=0.017)。结论:相对于PB,巧克力球囊联合DCB血管成形术没有明显的优势。然而,它确实减少了复杂病变的绝对总救助支架长度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Combined chocolate drug-coatedballoon treatment of femoropopliteal artery lesions in patients with Rutherford Grade 3-6.

Background: To investigate the efficacy of Chocolate balloon use as an adjunct to drug-coated balloon (DCB) angioplasty for the treatment of femoropopliteal lesions. Patients and methods: This retrospective study was performed with a 12-month follow-up period. The rate of flow-limiting dissection, primary patency, rate and length of bailout stenting, and freedom from major adverse limb events (MALEs) were compared between femoropopliteal lesions treated with plain balloons (PBs) and those treated with Chocolate balloons combined with DCB angioplasty. Results: In total, 192 patients (197 de-novo lesions) were included: 137 patients (141 lesions) in the PB group and 55 patients (56 lesions) in the Chocolate balloon group. The mean total lesion lengths were 126.84±71.57 and 138.39±65.35 mm (P=0.297), more than half of patients had chronic total occlusion (53.2% and 51.8%, P=0.859), the rates of flow-limiting dissection were 15.6% and 12.5% (P=0.579). Rates of primary patency were 88.1% and 92.6%, respectively. Chocolate balloon use reduced the mean total bailout stenting length (135.17±68.85 vs. 98.24±36.78 mm, P=0.022), including in complex lesions (180±70.43 vs. 102.50±44.64 mm, P=0.011), and the absolute bailout stenting length (total bailout stenting/lesion length ratio; 0.74±0.24 vs. 0.48±0.19, P=0.017). Conclusions: Relative to PB, Chocolate balloon use combined with DCB angioplasty did not show a significant advantage. It did, however, reduce the absolute total bailout stenting length in complex lesions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
11.10%
发文量
61
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Vasa is the European journal of vascular medicine. It is the official organ of the German, Swiss, and Slovenian Societies of Angiology. The journal publishes original research articles, case reports and reviews on vascular biology, epidemiology, prevention, diagnosis, medical treatment and interventions for diseases of the arterial circulation, in the field of phlebology and lymphology including the microcirculation, except the cardiac circulation. Vasa combines basic science with clinical medicine making it relevant to all physicians interested in the whole vascular field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信