运动前低血糖指数和高血糖指数小食对足球专项表现的影响:连续血糖监测的应用

IF 2.5 2区 医学 Q2 SPORT SCIENCES
Journal of Sports Sciences Pub Date : 2025-07-01 Epub Date: 2025-04-24 DOI:10.1080/02640414.2025.2497672
Yuxin Zuo, Eric Tsz-Chun Poon, Xiaoyuan Zhang, Borui Zhang, Chen Zheng, Fenghua Sun
{"title":"运动前低血糖指数和高血糖指数小食对足球专项表现的影响:连续血糖监测的应用","authors":"Yuxin Zuo, Eric Tsz-Chun Poon, Xiaoyuan Zhang, Borui Zhang, Chen Zheng, Fenghua Sun","doi":"10.1080/02640414.2025.2497672","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study aimed to investigate the effects of pre-exercise snack bars with different glycemic indices (GI) on soccer-specific performance. In a randomised crossover study design, 12 recreational soccer players consumed either low- or high-GI snack bars 1 h before 25 min small-sided game (SSG) training. Following the SSG training, the players' passing abilities were assessed using the Loughborough Soccer Passing Test (LSPT), followed by aerobic endurance capacities YOYO Intermittent Recovery Test Level 1 (YYIRT), respectively. Continuous glucose monitors (CGM) were used to track the glycemic response during SSG training and all tests. The result showed that participants' performance was significantly better in the low-GI trial compared with the high-GI trial for the LSPT movement (58.27   ±   10.99 vs. 62.27   ±   7.63 s, <i>p</i> < 0.05), LSPT total (74.64   ±   22.66 vs. 83.18   ±   18.29 s, <i>p</i> < 0.05), and YYIRT (1196   ±   657 vs. 993   ±   536 m, <i>p</i> < 0.01). The CGM data indicated a lower mean (6.2   ±   0.7 vs. 7.1   ±   0.6 mmol/L, <i>p</i> < 0.01) and lower glycemic variability in postprandial interstitial glucose levels in the low-GI trial, compared with the high-GI trial. In conclusion, pre-exercise low-GI snacks could result in more stable glycemic responses and enhance soccer-specific performance.</p>","PeriodicalId":17066,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Sports Sciences","volume":" ","pages":"1397-1405"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effects of pre-exercise snack bars with low- and high-glycemic index on soccer-specific performance: An application of continuous glucose monitoring.\",\"authors\":\"Yuxin Zuo, Eric Tsz-Chun Poon, Xiaoyuan Zhang, Borui Zhang, Chen Zheng, Fenghua Sun\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/02640414.2025.2497672\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This study aimed to investigate the effects of pre-exercise snack bars with different glycemic indices (GI) on soccer-specific performance. In a randomised crossover study design, 12 recreational soccer players consumed either low- or high-GI snack bars 1 h before 25 min small-sided game (SSG) training. Following the SSG training, the players' passing abilities were assessed using the Loughborough Soccer Passing Test (LSPT), followed by aerobic endurance capacities YOYO Intermittent Recovery Test Level 1 (YYIRT), respectively. Continuous glucose monitors (CGM) were used to track the glycemic response during SSG training and all tests. The result showed that participants' performance was significantly better in the low-GI trial compared with the high-GI trial for the LSPT movement (58.27   ±   10.99 vs. 62.27   ±   7.63 s, <i>p</i> < 0.05), LSPT total (74.64   ±   22.66 vs. 83.18   ±   18.29 s, <i>p</i> < 0.05), and YYIRT (1196   ±   657 vs. 993   ±   536 m, <i>p</i> < 0.01). The CGM data indicated a lower mean (6.2   ±   0.7 vs. 7.1   ±   0.6 mmol/L, <i>p</i> < 0.01) and lower glycemic variability in postprandial interstitial glucose levels in the low-GI trial, compared with the high-GI trial. In conclusion, pre-exercise low-GI snacks could result in more stable glycemic responses and enhance soccer-specific performance.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17066,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Sports Sciences\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1397-1405\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Sports Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/02640414.2025.2497672\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/4/24 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SPORT SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Sports Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02640414.2025.2497672","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究旨在探讨不同血糖指数(GI)运动前小吃店对足球专项表现的影响。在一项随机交叉研究设计中,12名休闲足球运动员在25分钟小边比赛(SSG)训练前1小时食用低或高gi小吃店。SSG训练结束后,分别使用拉夫堡足球传球测试(LSPT)和YOYO间歇恢复测试1级(YYIRT)对球员的传球能力进行评估。连续血糖监测仪(CGM)用于跟踪SSG训练和所有测试期间的血糖反应。结果显示,低gi组受试者在LSPT运动方面的表现明显优于高gi组(58.27±10.99 s vs. 62.27±7.63 s, p p p p p
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effects of pre-exercise snack bars with low- and high-glycemic index on soccer-specific performance: An application of continuous glucose monitoring.

This study aimed to investigate the effects of pre-exercise snack bars with different glycemic indices (GI) on soccer-specific performance. In a randomised crossover study design, 12 recreational soccer players consumed either low- or high-GI snack bars 1 h before 25 min small-sided game (SSG) training. Following the SSG training, the players' passing abilities were assessed using the Loughborough Soccer Passing Test (LSPT), followed by aerobic endurance capacities YOYO Intermittent Recovery Test Level 1 (YYIRT), respectively. Continuous glucose monitors (CGM) were used to track the glycemic response during SSG training and all tests. The result showed that participants' performance was significantly better in the low-GI trial compared with the high-GI trial for the LSPT movement (58.27   ±   10.99 vs. 62.27   ±   7.63 s, p < 0.05), LSPT total (74.64   ±   22.66 vs. 83.18   ±   18.29 s, p < 0.05), and YYIRT (1196   ±   657 vs. 993   ±   536 m, p < 0.01). The CGM data indicated a lower mean (6.2   ±   0.7 vs. 7.1   ±   0.6 mmol/L, p < 0.01) and lower glycemic variability in postprandial interstitial glucose levels in the low-GI trial, compared with the high-GI trial. In conclusion, pre-exercise low-GI snacks could result in more stable glycemic responses and enhance soccer-specific performance.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Sports Sciences
Journal of Sports Sciences 社会科学-运动科学
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
2.90%
发文量
147
审稿时长
12 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Sports Sciences has an international reputation for publishing articles of a high standard and is both Medline and Clarivate Analytics-listed. It publishes research on various aspects of the sports and exercise sciences, including anatomy, biochemistry, biomechanics, performance analysis, physiology, psychology, sports medicine and health, as well as coaching and talent identification, kinanthropometry and other interdisciplinary perspectives. The emphasis of the Journal is on the human sciences, broadly defined and applied to sport and exercise. Besides experimental work in human responses to exercise, the subjects covered will include human responses to technologies such as the design of sports equipment and playing facilities, research in training, selection, performance prediction or modification, and stress reduction or manifestation. Manuscripts considered for publication include those dealing with original investigations of exercise, validation of technological innovations in sport or comprehensive reviews of topics relevant to the scientific study of sport.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信